CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07176052Updated Sep 16, 2025

Expectation, Pain Outcomes, and Pain Medication Following Oncology Abdominal Surgery: A Cohort Study

An observational study in Cancer, Hepatic, Cancer, Esophagus and Cancer, Pancreas, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-16.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study includes participants undergoing major hepatic surgery, surgery in the esophagus or stomach, or major surgery on the pancreas performed at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. The aims of the study 1: To record patients' level of catastrophizing preoperatively and pain perioperatively, and pain treatment, as well as related side effects. Furthermore, to investigate whether it is possible to assign the task of rating pain scores to the patient.

2. To investigate patients' expectations preoperatively and the fulfillment of these expectations 30 days after, and the development of chronic pain after 6 months. 3. To record patients' pre- and postoperatively rated health and daily quality of recovery during the seven days of admission. Furthermore, patients' symptoms, levels of pain, and use of analgesics will be assessed 30 days and six months after discharge.

Read the detailed description

This study includes one main study and two sub-studies. The main study and sub-study 1a are both prospective observational cohort studies. Study 1b is a qualitative study that includes semi-structured interviews with the included patients. No formal sample size calculation was performed, as the study method is exploratory.

Location of the study This study will be conducted at the Department of Transplantation and Organ Surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, from October 1, 2025, to October 1, 2026. Study 1b will be performed by phone.

Participants The participants will include patients undergoing major hepatic surgery, surgery in the esophagus or cardia, or major surgery on the pancreas performed at Rigshospitalet.

Inclusion criteria Patients must meet the following criteria to be suitable for inclusion in the study.

Patients > 18 years undergoing elective primary surgical treatment according to the protocol with curative intent. Patients who can read and understand the Danish language.

Exclusion criteria Patients meeting one or more of the following criteria are ineligible for inclusion in this study.

Patients who are cognitively disabled and cannot mentally cooperate with the study design, as assessed by the investigator.

Procedure for patients who withdraw from the trial In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 24, patients have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason, but the reason must be recorded in the patient's Case Report Form if the cause is known.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer, Hepatic
  • Cancer, Esophagus
  • Cancer, Pancreas

Keywords

  • Acute pain
  • patient expectations
  • Cancer in the upper abdominal
  • analgesics
  • patients self-rating
03

In context

Liver Neoplasms

1,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Neoplasms; 345 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 350 observational studies indexed under Liver Neoplasms.

Browse Liver Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,017 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have undergone surgery in the pancreas, hepar or esophagus/cardia at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients > 18 years undergoing elective surgical treatment in the liver, esophagus/cardia, or pancreas, according to the protocol with curative intent.
  • Patients who can read and understand the Danish language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are cognitively disabled and cannot mentally cooperate with the study design, as assessed by the investigator.

In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, patients have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Surgery, liver

    Located in the liver

    Procedure: cancer surgery

  • Surgery, esophagus or stomach

    Located in the esophagus or stomach

    Procedure: cancer surgery

  • Surgery, pancreas

    Located in the pancreas

    Procedure: cancer surgery

Interventions

  • Procedurecancer surgery

    All surgery will be performed at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median use of analgesics and opioids from the day of surgery until day seven after surgery

    All analgesics provided from the day of surgery until seven days after surgery, calculated in median/means for the different surgical groups

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' preoperative expectations

    Patients' preoperative expectations evaluated by the treatment expectation questionnaire (TEX-Q. The questionnaire contains 15 questions where the patient can rate their expectations from 0 to ten. 0 is no relief, no benefit or no improvement, and ten represents the opposite. Maximum score is 130 indicating very high expectations.

    Time frame: At inclusion

  2. Daily pain measured by the patients

    Patients will be asked to measure pain during rest and mobilisation, and the location of the pain. Pain will be rated by the Numeric Rating Scale from 0 to ten. 0 is no pain and ten is the worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: From the day of surgery until the seventh day after surgery

  3. Fulfillment of patients´ expecations

    Explore in which terms the patients´ expectations were fulfilled by interviewing the patients. We will use a semi-structured interview guide for this purpose.

    Time frame: 30 days after admission

  4. The development of chronic pain

    We will interview the patients by phone and ask them to rate their pain and if they are still using analgesics. The pain will be rated by the Numeric Rating Scale from 0 to ten. 0 is no pain and ten is the worst imaginable pain. The analgesics will be mapped according to name and frequency used

    Time frame: Six months after admission

  5. Postoperative quality of recovery

    The patients will be asked to fill out the QoR-15D questionnaire to rate their postoperative quality of recovery. The questionnaire contains 15 questions with a part A which rates every question from 0 indicating at no point to 10 all the time. Part B is the opposite. A high score indicates a good recovery and the score ranges from 0 to 150.

    Time frame: The day of surgery until the seventh day after surgery

  6. Health-related quality of life

    The patients will be asked to fill out the questionnaire EQ-5D-5L to measure health-related quality of life. The questionnaire contains five areas; ability to move, personal care, activities, pain and anxiety/depression. Every arera can be rated in five different ways differing from no problems to it is not possible to perform activities, extreme pain or anxiety. Finally the questionnaire includes a scale from 0 indicating the worst health you can imagine to 100 indicating the very best. The patient should place an X on the number indicating the self-evaluated health

    Time frame: Preoperatively and 30 days and six months after discharge

  7. Level of Pain Catastrophizing

    The PCS (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) will be used for this purpose. The PCS is a 13-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure catastrophic thinking related to pain. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale: 0: Not at all, 1: To a slight degree, 2: To a moderate degree, 3: To a great degree, 4: All the time. The total PCS score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater levels of pain catastrophizing. Scores ≥30 are considered to reflect a clinically relevant level of catastrophizing and correspond to the 75th percentile in chronic pain clinic populations. Scores between the 50th and 75th percentile (typically 20-29) indicate moderate risk, while scores above 30 suggest high risk for persistent pain and disability.

    Time frame: preoperatively

  8. Patient's perceived quality of recovery

    The patient's perceived quality of recovery will be monitored using the QoR-15D. The score ranges from 0 to 15025,26. An excellent quality will be considered for numbers from 136-150. Good quality for 122-135. Moderate quality: 90-121; poor quality: 0-89. Health-related quality of life will be collected preoperatively and at 30 days (+/-7 days) postoperatively using the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L uses five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on five levels: 1. No problems. 2. Slight problems. 3. Moderate problems. 4. Severe problems. 5. Extreme problems (or unable to do).

    Time frame: The day of surgery until day seven after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hanley C, Ladha KS, Clarke HA, Cuthbertson BC, Wijeysundera DN; METS Study Investigators. Association of postoperative complications with persistent post-surgical pain: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Dec 3. PubMed 34872718 ↗
  • Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22. PubMed 29397134 ↗
  • Kleif J, Edwards HM, Sort R, Vilandt J, Gogenur I. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13. PubMed 25867135 ↗
  • Fantola G, Brunaud L, Nguyen-Thi PL, Germain A, Ayav A, Bresler L. Risk factors for postoperative complications in robotic general surgery. Updates Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0398-4. Epub 2016 Sep 30. PubMed 27696276 ↗
  • Angelica MD, Fong Y. Patient Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcomes. October 2008; 141: 520-9.
  • Hawker GA, Conner-Spady BL, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Jones CA, Ravi B, Noseworthy T, Dick D, Powell J, Paul P, Marshall DA; BEST-Knee Study Team. Patients' Preoperative Expectations of Total Knee Arthroplasty and Satisfaction With Outcomes at One Year: A Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Feb;73(2):223-231. doi: 10.1002/art.41510. Epub 2020 Dec 26. PubMed 32892511 ↗
  • Filbay SR, Judge A, Delmestri A, Arden NK, Altman D, Beard D, Carr A, Cooper C, Culliford D, Griffin T, Javaid K, Latham J, Murray D, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Price A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Waljee J, Mcglinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D, Rief W, Shedden-mora MC, Laferton JAC, Auer C, Petrie KJ, Salzmann S, Schedlowski M, Moosdorf R, Younger J, Gandhi V, Hubbard E, Mackey S, Arrow K, Burgoyne LL, Rainville P, Jumma W, Mohamed M, Joseph L, Canby G, Paungmali A, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U, Verbeek J. Evaluating Patients' Expectations From a Novel Patient-Centered Perspective Predicts Knee Arthroplasty Outcome. Pain Ther 2017; 6: 2146-2152.e4.
  • Visser E, Marsman M, van Rossum PSN, Cheong E, Al-Naimi K, van Klei WA, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Postoperative pain management after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-11. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox052. PubMed 28859388 ↗
  • Pirie K, Traer E, Finniss D, Myles PS, Riedel B. Current approaches to acute postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery: a narrative review and future directions. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;129(3):378-393. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.029. Epub 2022 Jul 6. PubMed 35803751 ↗
  • Desai N, El-Boghdadly K, Albrecht E. Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):101-117. doi: 10.1111/anae.15068. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32385856 ↗
  • Hemmerling TM. Pain management in abdominal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Nov;403(7):791-803. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1705-y. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PubMed 30284029 ↗
  • Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jan;30(1):149-60. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860019. Epub 2013 Nov 15. PubMed 24237004 ↗
  • Arnold M, Abnet CC, Neale RE, Vignat J, Giovannucci EL, McGlynn KA, Bray F. Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):335-349.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068. Epub 2020 Apr 2. PubMed 32247694 ↗
  • Deo SVS, Sharma J, Kumar S. GLOBOCAN 2020 Report on Global Cancer Burden: Challenges and Opportunities for Surgical Oncologists. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6497-6500. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12151-6. Epub 2022 Jul 15. PubMed 35838905 ↗
  • Sullivan R, Alatise OI, Anderson BO, Audisio R, Autier P, Aggarwal A, Balch C, Brennan MF, Dare A, D'Cruz A, Eggermont AM, Fleming K, Gueye SM, Hagander L, Herrera CA, Holmer H, Ilbawi AM, Jarnheimer A, Ji JF, Kingham TP, Liberman J, Leather AJ, Meara JG, Mukhopadhyay S, Murthy SS, Omar S, Parham GP, Pramesh CS, Riviello R, Rodin D, Santini L, Shrikhande SV, Shrime M, Thomas R, Tsunoda AT, van de Velde C, Veronesi U, Vijaykumar DK, Watters D, Wang S, Wu YL, Zeiton M, Purushotham A. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(11):1193-224. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00223-5. PubMed 26427363 ↗
  • Flam J. PERIOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER - SHORT REVIEW. 2021; 49: 103-7
  • Arnold M, Ferlay J, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1564-1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321600. Epub 2020 Jun 30. PubMed 32606208 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — I do not need to share the IPD with other researchers

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07176052
Lead sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Responsible party
Anja Edith Geisler (Head of Research Nursing, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2025

Study contacts

Anja Geisler, phD
Contact
anja.edith.geisler@regionh.dk
+4523318446
Eva Jørgensen, RN
Contact
eva.maria.bjerg.joergensen@regionh.dk
Anja Geisler, phd
principal investigator · Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion