CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07048418RHINOFENTEUpdated Jul 22, 2025

Aesthetic and Functional Self-Assessment Following Rhinoseptoplasty in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

An observational study in Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Secondary rhino-septoplasty in unilateral cleft lip and palate is the treatment of choice for the correction of aesthetic deformities and the functional impact on ventilation nasal. It remains a difficult treatment. It can be proposed at the end of growth or from the age of 10, depending on nasal obstruction and the severity of the deformity.

The CLEFT-Q questionnaire, validated in 2017, has not yet been widely used in studies. The NOSE questionnaire is an older functional questionnaire that is complementary to the CLEFT-Q.

Cleft lip and palate are rare diseases, accounting for around 30% of all facial clefts, which occur at a rate of 1/750 births in Europe. Deformation of the nose and nasal septum is constant, and more or less severe in unilateral forms.

In the absence of rhino-septoplasty performed during primary cleft repair surgery, deformities persist in children and adolescents. There is a significant aesthetic impact in children, which generally increases in adolescents. The problem of nasal obstruction causes functional discomfort that can be disabling. Open rhino-septoplasty is a standard procedure and is proposed as a secondary treatment in this population . It is indicated during growth in cases of nasal obstruction, or as a function of aesthetic demands.

The hypothesis is that secondary rhino-septoplasty gives long-term satisfaction in patients in terms of aesthetics and respiratory function. The originality of this study lies in the use of the recently validated CLEFT-Q questionnaire to assess the aesthetic and functional satisfaction of patients in adulthood after secondary rhino-septoplasty performed in childhood or adolescence. This long-term follow-up will enable us to assess the stability of aesthetic and functional results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate

Keywords

  • rhinoplasty
  • septoplasty
  • rhinoseptoplasty
  • cleft
  • CLEFT-Q
  • nasal obstruction
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

Inclusion criteria

Unilateral cleft lip and palate Surgery performed at the university hospital as primary surgery (before 12 months of age) without rhino-septoplasty Rhino-septoplasty performed at the university hospital as secondary surgery in childhood or adolescence Aged between 18 and 30 years at the time the CLEFT Q questionnaire was sent out.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Incomplete clinical file Primary operation elsewhere than at the Montpellier University Hospital Other operation on the nose prior to rhinoseptoplasty Subject unable to read and/or write Impossibility of following the patient during the study period Opposition to participation after a period of reflection Non affiliation to a social security scheme Persons subject to a legal protection measure (placed under safeguard of justice, persons under guardianship or curatorship), Persons participating in another research study including an exclusion period still in progress Pregnant or breast-feeding women

04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group of cleft lip and palate patients who underwent rhinoseptoplasty in childhood or adolescence.

    Other: Mailing and completing CLEFT-Q and NOSE questionnaires

Interventions

  • OtherMailing and completing CLEFT-Q and NOSE questionnaires

    Mailing and completing CLEFT-Q and NOSE questionnaires

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Scale

    The Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness Scale (NOSE) consists of 5 items with 5 modalities (from 0 to 4) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms : nasal congestion, nasal obstruction, difficulty breathing through the nose, sleep disturbance and breathing difficulties during exercise.

    Time frame: At inclusion (i.e. 3 to 20 years after surgery, according to inclusion criteria)

  2. CLEFT-Q nose appearance

    A raw score is first calculated as the sum of the scale items, then rescaled from a conversion table into a score from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: At inclusion (i.e. 3 to 20 years after surgery, according to inclusion criteria)

  3. CLEFT-Q nostrils appearance

    A raw score is first calculated as the sum of the scale items, then rescaled from a conversion table into a score from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: At inclusion (i.e. 3 to 20 years after surgery, according to inclusion criteria)

  4. CLEFT-Q face appearance

    A raw score is first calculated as the sum of the scale items, then rescaled from a conversion table into a score from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: At inclusion (i.e. 3 to 20 years after surgery, according to inclusion criteria)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Asher Mc Dade Score

    The aesthetic result is assessed on the basis of photographs (from the medical file) of the face, profile and lower view of the face before/after surgery, using the Asher-McDade method (score from 3 : best appearance to 15 : worst appearance)

    Time frame: At least 6 months after surgery

  2. Surgical complications according to the Clavien Dindo classification

    The Clavien-Dindo classification ranges from Grade 1 (minor deviation from normal recovery without pharmacological treatment) to Grade 5 (death). Grade 2 involves complications requiring drugs like antibiotics or blood transfusions. Grade 3 includes complications requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention (IIIa without general anesthesia, IIIb with). Grade 4 refers to life-threatening complications needing ICU care (IVa single organ failure, IVb multi-organ). This system standardizes reporting and allows comparison of surgical outcomes.

    Time frame: few days after surgery

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CHU Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295 MONTPELLIER, France
    • Guillaume Pr Captier · Contact
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07048418
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2025
Start date
Jul 9, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2025

Study contacts

Guillaume Captier, MD-PhD
Contact
g-captier@chu-montpellier.fr
+33467338761

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion