ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07687537Updated Jul 7, 2026

Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment Outcomes Study

An observational study in Cleft Lip and Palate, sponsored by University of Florida. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
1 Day to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Infants with cleft lip and palate often benefit from presurgical infant orthopedic treatment before surgical repair. Multiple standard of care approaches are selected based on each infant's clinical presentation and family circumstances. This prospective observational cohort study will evaluate clinical outcomes, treatment efficiency, and family burden using routinely collected clinical records and photographs to support individualized, evidence-based PSIO treatment planning.

Read the detailed description

Presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) treatment is widely used to improve alveolar alignment, nasal symmetry, and soft tissue relationships before primary repair in infants with cleft lip and palate. Standard of care approaches include lip taping, nasoalveolar molding (NAM), and other prefabricated systems. Treatment selection is individualized according to each infant's clinical presentation and family circumstances rather than randomly assigned.

Although PSIO is widely practiced, limited prospective evidence compares the clinical outcomes of individualized standard of care treatment approaches in real-world clinical practice. This prospective observational cohort study will evaluate the clinical outcomes of individualized PSIO treatment provided as part of routine clinical care at the University of Florida College of Dentistry. Infants with cleft lip and palate will be prospectively enrolled and will receive lip taping, NAM, or prefabricated appliance, or no presurgical intervention according to clinical indications and family-specific factors. No investigational drugs, investigational devices, or research-only procedures will be used. Clinical outcomes, including alveolar alignment, cleft gap reduction, nasal symmetry, treatment efficiency, and family treatment burden, will be assessed using routinely collected clinical records, photographs, and treatment data. The findings will provide evidence to support individualized, evidence-based treatment planning for PSIO care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cleft Lip and Palate

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Presurgical Infant Orthopedics
  • Nasoalveolar Molding
  • Cleft Lip and Palate
  • Lip Taping
  • Prefabricated Systems
03

In context

Cleft Lip

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Cleft Lip; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 49 observational studies indexed under Cleft Lip.

Browse Cleft Lip studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,287 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 143 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Infants diagnosed with cleft lip and palate who receive presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) treatment at the Pediatric Dentistry, University of Florida. Participants will be enrolled prospectively during routine clinical care. Treatment approaches are selected by the treating clinicians based on each infant's clinical presentation and family circumstances rather than by the study protocol. Clinical outcome data will be collected prospectively during routine clinical care and follow-up visits.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of cleft lip and or palate with clinical indication for presurgical infant orthopedic treatment
  2. Age appropriate for presurgical infant orthopedic treatment, generally from birth until surgical repair
  3. Parent or guardian ability to provide consent
  4. Willingness to comply with follow up visits to the extent feasible given family circumstances

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Other craniofacial syndromes requiring a substantially different management protocol
  2. Anticipated inability to complete any follow up
  3. Lack of parental consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate Receiving Presurgical Infant Orthopedics

    Infants diagnosed with cleft lip and palate who receive standard of care presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) treatment at the Pediatric Dentistry, University of Florida. PSIO treatment approaches, including lip taping, nasoalveolar molding (NAM), prefabricated systems, or combinations of these techniques, are selected according to each infant's clinical presentation and family circumstances as part of routine clinical care. This observational study does not assign treatment. Clinical outcomes are prospectively collected and compared among the different treatment approaches.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in alveolar segment alignment

    Measured on standardized dental model or directly in the mouth using linear measurements (mm).

    Time frame: Baseline, at each routine follow-up visit during PSIO treatment, and immediately before primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months).

  2. Change in nasal symmetry

    Measured from standardized frontal and basal clinical photographs using anthropometric analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, at each routine follow-up visit during PSIO treatment, and immediately before primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months).

  3. Treatment completion

    Percentage of participants completing individualized PSIO treatment before primary lip repair.

    Time frame: At primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months after initiation of PSIO).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of clinic visits during PSIO treatment

    Total number of scheduled clinical visits required from initiation of PSIO treatment to primary lip repair.

    Time frame: From initiation of PSIO treatment to primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months)

  2. Duration of PSIO treatment

    Number of days from initiation of PSIO treatment until primary lip repair.

    Time frame: From initiation of PSIO treatment to primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months)

  3. Number of appliance modifications

    Total number of appliance adjustments with any issues or remakes required during PSIO treatment.

    Time frame: From initiation of PSIO treatment to primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months)

  4. Caregiver compliance

    Percentage of scheduled appointments attended and adherence to prescribed appliance wear documented in clinical records.

    Time frame: Initial visiting date to primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months)

  5. Number of treatment-related adverse events

    Number of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse events, including appliance-related complications, oral mucosal irritation, and unplanned appliance modifications.

    Time frame: From initiation of PSIO treatment to primary lip repair (approximately 3-5 months)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Perez Rivera LR, Tanikawa DYS, Chong DK, Flores RL, Shetye PR. A Comparative Assessment of Surgeon Appraisal of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics Outcomes Using PLANA and NAM. J Craniofac Surg. 2026 Jul-Aug 01;37(7-8):2128-2132. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000012753. Epub 2026 Apr 6. PubMed 41940938 ↗
  • Tanikawa DYS, Figueroa AA. "Comparative Effectiveness of PLANA and Nasal Elevator in Presurgical Orthopedics: A 3D Anthropometric Study of Unilateral Cleft Lip.". Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013220. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42160712 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The investigators have not yet determined whether individual participant data (IPD) will be shared with other researchers. Any future decision regarding data sharing will be made in accordance with University of Florida policies, applicable laws and regulations, Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirements, participant privacy protections, and HIPAA regulations. Any shared data, if applicable, will be de-identified.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07687537
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Mi Sook Lee, DMD, MSD, PhD
Contact
misooklee@ufl.edu
352-273-7631
Marcio Guelmann, DDS
Contact
guelmann@ufl.edu
352-273-7635

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion