ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07651904Updated Jun 16, 2026

Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Scoring

An observational study in Cleft Palate, Cleft Lip and Laryngospasm, sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
0 Years to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cleft lip and palate surgeries present unique anesthetic challenges due to shared airway access with the surgical field, frequent anatomical abnormalities, and a predominantly infant and toddler population. These factors substantially increase the risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), including laryngospasm, bronchospasm, desaturation, post-extubation stridor, and unanticipated re-intubation.

This prospective single-center observational cohort study aims to determine the true incidence of PRAEs in pediatric patients undergoing elective cleft lip and/or palate repair under general anesthesia, and to identify independent predictive risk factors using standardized airway assessment tools including the Han Mask Ventilation Score and the Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS). No interventions beyond routine clinical practice will be applied. All airway management decisions will remain at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.

Read the detailed description

Cleft lip and palate are among the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies.

The surgical population predominantly consists of infants and young children who may present with associated syndromes, micrognathia, retrognathia, or obstructive sleep apnea - all of which contribute to difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation. Sharing the airway with the surgical team and the use of the Dingman retractor further increase the risk of airway compromise during emergence and extubation. Published data on PRAE incidence in this population are largely retrospective and heterogeneous, and no adequately powered prospective study has systematically evaluated predictive risk factors using validated scoring systems.

Study Design:

Prospective, single-center, observational cohort study conducted at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. No interventions beyond established routine anesthesia protocols will be performed. Parental written informed consent will be obtained prior to enrollment.

Anesthetic Protocol:

All patients will undergo standard intraoperative monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, end-tidal CO₂). Anesthesia will be induced with sevoflurane inhalation followed by intravenous induction after vascular access. Maintenance will be achieved with sevoflurane and remifentanil infusion. Analgesia and perioperative steroid administration will follow the department's routine protocol.

Data Collection:

Preoperative variables: age, weight, cleft type (unilateral/bilateral/isolated lip/isolated palate/combined), cleft width and depth, alveolar gap, micrognathia, retrognathia, cervical extension limitation, OSAS history, Pierre Robin sequence, and prior ICU admission.

Intraoperative variables: induction type and agents, neuromuscular blockade use, operator experience level, mask ventilation difficulty (Han Score), number of intubation attempts, laryngoscopy device used, Cormack-Lehane grade, VIDIAC score, IDS score, adjunct airway tools employed, minimum SpO₂ and bradycardia during intubation, Dingman retractor duration, and steroid use.

Primary outcome assessment: extubation-related minimum SpO₂, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, post-extubation stridor, coughing episodes, and need for unplanned re-intubation or ICU admission.

Vital signs (heart rate, SpO₂, blood pressure) will be recorded at intubation, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes intraoperatively, and postoperatively.

Statistical Analysis:

Descriptive statistics will be reported as mean ± SD or median (IQR) for continuous variables and as n (%) for categorical variables. Univariate comparisons between PRAE and non-PRAE groups will employ independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Independent predictors of PRAE will be identified via binary logistic regression (backward stepwise method), reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance threshold: p\<0.05.

Sample Size:

Based on a reported PRAE incidence of \~25% in comparable populations, a minimum of 120 patients is required (α=0.05, power=80%, G*Power 3.1). Accounting for anticipated dropout and exclusions, the target enrollment is 140-150 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cleft Palate
  • Cleft Lip
  • Laryngospasm
  • Bronchospasm
  • Airway Obstruction
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Difficult Intubation

Keywords

  • cleft lip
  • cleft palate
  • pediatric anesthesia
  • perioperative respiratory adverse events
  • Han mask ventilation score
  • micrognathia
  • intubation difficulty score
03

In context

Cleft Palate

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Cleft Palate; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 85 across 40 observational studies indexed under Cleft Palate.

Browse Cleft Palate studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Infants and toddlers aged 0-3 years scheduled for elective cleft lip and/or palate repair under general anesthesia . No randomization is performed; all management follows routine institutional anesthesia practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 0-3 years (infants and toddlers)
  • Scheduled for elective cleft lip and/or palate repair surgery
  • General anesthesia planned
  • Written parental/guardian obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing respiratory failure or active tracheostomy
  • Emergency surgical procedures
  • Inability to obtain parental/guardian consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cleft Lip and/or Palate Surgery Cohort

    Pediatric patients aged 0-3 years undergoing elective cleft lip and/or palate repair under general anesthesia. All subjects are managed per routine anesthesia protocol. Perioperative airway events and predictive clinical variables are prospectively recorded from induction through PACU discharge.

    Other: Standard General Anesthesia per Institutional Protocol

Interventions

  • OtherStandard General Anesthesia per Institutional Protocol

    No interventions beyond routine clinical anesthesia practice. All airway management decisions, including induction technique, laryngoscopy device selection, and extubation strategy, are made at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Observational data collection only.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events (PRAEs)

    Composite outcome defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: laryngospasm, bronchospasm, post-extubation stridor, oxygen desaturation lasting \>10 seconds (SpO₂ \<90%), or unplanned re-intubation, occurring at any point from induction through PACU discharge

    Time frame: first 24 hours from anesthesia induction. assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively.From anesthesia induction to discharge from the hospital.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Independent Predictors of PRAE - Odds Ratios

    Identification of independent risk factors for PRAE via binary logistic regression, including Han Mask Ventilation Score, IDS, age, cleft type, micrognathia, retrognathia, OSAS, Pierre Robin sequence, and passive smoke exposure. Results reported as OR (95% CI).

    Time frame: first 24 hours from anesthesia induction. assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively.From anesthesia induction to discharge from the hospital.

  2. Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS)

    Composite intubation difficulty score (Adnet 1997) calculated as N1-N7 sum; IDS ≥5 defined as difficult intubation.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  3. Han Mask Ventilation Score

    Four-point scale assessing difficulty of mask ventilation; score ≥2 considered indicative of elevated PRAE risk.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, at time of mask ventilation

  4. Minimum SpO₂ During Intubation

    Intraoperative

    Time frame: Lowest pulse oximetry value recorded during laryngoscopy and intubation attempts.

  5. Minimum SpO₂ During Extubation

    At extubation

    Time frame: Lowest pulse oximetry value recorded during and immediately after extubation.

  6. Postoperative ICU Admission Rate

    Proportion of patients requiring unplanned postoperative intensive care unit admission.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of surgery

  7. Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay

    Total duration of hospital stay in days.

    Time frame: From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Feyrer J, Irouschek A, Golditz T, Schmidt J, Lutz R, Kesting M, Moritz A. Airway Management in Children Undergoing Cleft Lip or Cleft Palate Surgery: An 8-Year Retrospective Analysis of 274 Cases. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Nov;35(11):925-933. doi: 10.1111/pan.70038. Epub 2025 Aug 16. PubMed 40817740 ↗
  • Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, O'Reilly M. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):267. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00059. No abstract available. PubMed 15220820 ↗
  • Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005. PubMed 9416711 ↗
  • Somerville N, Fenlon S. Anaesthesia For Cleft Lip And Palate Surgery. Continuing Education İn Anaesthesia, Critical Care And Pain. 2005/06/01;5(3).
  • Tümer M, Ankay Yılbaş A, Soysal Kaya M, Karakoyak B, Kaya K, Canbay Ö, Et Al. Anesthetic Approach And Perioperative Complications İn Cleft Lip / Palate Surgery: A Single Center Retrospective Study. ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2022;44
  • Gupta N, Nagar K, Dixit P, Tiwari T, Srivastava VK, Singh PR. Airway Consideration İn Cleft Patients-Challenges And Approaches. Journal Of Cleft Lip Palate And Craniofacial Anomalies. Jan-Jun 2022;9(1).
  • Denning S, Ng E, Wong Riff KWY. Anaesthesia for cleft lip and palate surgery. BJA Educ. 2021 Oct;21(10):384-389. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 34567793 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 7, 2026
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07651904
Lead sponsor
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
dilara gocmen (assist prof, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
Start date
Jun 27, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Dilara Göçmen
Contact
dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
+90 216 625 45 45
dilara göçmen
principal investigator · Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion