ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07010328Updated Jun 8, 2025

Integrating AI in Postural Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Neurorehabilitation and AI-based home rehabilitation for postural disorders in Parkinson Disease, Physical Inactivity and Physical Disability, sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered May 2025).
  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postural abnormalities are highly disabling complications of Parkinson's disease (PD). These include camptocormia, anterocollis, and Pisa Syndrome (PS). PS is characterized by a lateral trunk flexion (LTF) typically exceeding 10 degrees, often accompanied by axial rotation, asymmetric shoulder positioning, and poor awareness of the postural alteration. This condition worsens during upright activities and improves in a supine position. Patients with PD and PS are characterized by more pronounced motor asymmetry, a disorganized trunk muscle activity, back pain, balance issues, and reduced quality of life compared to PD patients without postural disorders.

Camptocormia, another disabling postural anomaly, involves an anterior trunk flexion that also improves when lying down. Both PS and camptocormia are challenging to treat, with limited and short-lasting benefits from current multidisciplinary approaches, including medication, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin injections, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Given the limitations of traditional rehabilitation strategies, there is a growing need for innovative and personalized approaches. In this context, advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) offer new possibilities for home-based treatment. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using a real-time visual feedback system powered by AI as a complementary intervention following inpatient neurorehabilitation for PD patients with trunk postural disorders (PS or camptocormia). A secondary objective is to assess whether an AI-guided, personalized exercise program can help maintain improvements in posture, mobility, and quality of life in the medium term.

By integrating quantitative and qualitative outcomes, this study seeks to fill a gap in the literature and explore the potential of AI-driven home rehabilitation to support long-term functional gains and foster greater independence and well-being in people with PD.

Read the detailed description

Postural abnormalities represent particularly disabling complications of Parkinson's disease (PD), significantly affecting patients' functional independence and quality of life. Among the most commonly observed postural deformities there are camptocormia, anterocollis, and Pisa Syndrome (PS). Pisa Syndrome is clinically characterized by a lateral trunk flexion (LTF) greater than 10 degrees, typically presenting with a uniform inclination from the sacrum to the C7 vertebra. It is often accompanied by axial rotation, leading to elevation and forward displacement of the contralateral shoulder. Additional clinical features include difficulty rotating the trunk away from the leaning side, worsening of symptoms during upright posture or walking, improvement in the supine position, and poor patient awareness of the postural deviation.

Patients with PD and PS exhibit greater motor symptom asymmetry, disorganized paraspinal muscle activation, back pain, balance and postural control issues, and reduced quality of life compared to PD patients without postural abnormalities. The current standard of care for these postural disorders typically includes a multidisciplinary approach involving pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, botulinum toxin injections, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). However, these interventions frequently yield only modest and short-lived improvements, highlighting the need for more sustainable and accessible treatment strategies.

Camptocormia is another severe postural abnormality seen in PD, defined as an involuntary forward flexion of the trunk that is mostly apparent during standing and walking, and tends to reduce when the patient is supine. Like PS, camptocormia is frequently associated with chronic back pain and is often resistant to dopaminergic medication, with many patients reporting no significant improvement in either "on" or "off" states.

The long-term management of these postural disorders remains a significant clinical challenge. Innovative, individualized rehabilitation strategies that can be seamlessly integrated into patients' daily routines are urgently needed. In recent years, technological advancements-particularly in the field of artificial intelligence (AI)-have opened up new avenues for delivering personalized home-based interventions.

This study investigates the feasibility and potential benefits of using a real-time, AI-based visual feedback system as a complementary treatment following hospital-based neurorehabilitation for PD patients with trunk postural disorders, specifically PS and camptocormia. The intervention uses the Kemtai platform, which analyzes movement through video-based AI to deliver customized exercise routines and real-time corrective feedback. This allows patients to engage in highly interactive and adaptive rehabilitation sessions from home, potentially improving adherence and functional outcomes.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and usability of this AI-based system as a continuation of care after inpatient rehabilitation. The secondary objective is to evaluate whether this personalized exercise program can prolong, over the medium term, the gains in posture, mobility, and quality of life achieved during the structured hospital-based rehabilitation period.

By collecting both qualitative feedback (e.g., user satisfaction, perceived usefulness) and quantitative metrics (e.g., trunk inclination angles, mobility scores by means of cinemtaic analysis of movement), this study aims to contribute new evidence on the role of intelligent digital tools in managing postural abnormalities in PD. The overarching hypothesis is that a home-based, AI-monitored exercise program could offer a sustainable, effective, accessible, and patient-centered approach to maintaining functional gains and supporting greater autonomy in everyday life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Physical Inactivity
  • Physical Disability
  • Pisa Syndrome

Keywords

  • Physical activity
  • Neurological disorder
  • Artificial Intelligence
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age above 18 years
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to MDS criteria
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤ III
  • Clinical diagnosis of camptocormia (presence of an anterior axial trunk flexion of at least 30°), or of Pisa Syndrome (presence of a lateral trunk flexion of at least 10°) at the time of enrollment (T0)
  • (MMSE) score > 23

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical parkinsonian syndromes
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Previous vertebral trauma
  • Current or past spinal tumors or infections
  • Idiopathic scoliosis
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Spinal canal stenosis
  • Other neurological conditions
  • Severe dyskinesias
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PD-Subjects

    Subjects with Parkinson's Disease and postural disorders (Pisa syndrome or camptocormia).

    Procedure: Neurorehabilitation · Device: AI-based home rehabilitation for postural disorders

Interventions

  • ProcedureNeurorehabilitation

    4-8 weeks of inhospital Neurorehabilitation

  • DeviceAI-based home rehabilitation for postural disorders

    AI-based home rehabilitation for postural disorders by means of the Kemtai platform.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. System Usability Scale (SUS)

    System Usability Scale (SUS) (continuous variable, score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability of the system)

    Time frame: Single evaluation after 6-8 weeks from intervention (T1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Static trunk cinematic analysis of movement

    By means of a cinematic analysis of movement, we will record trunk posture in static upright standing position (anterior trunk flexion and lateral trunk flexion).

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  2. Dynamic trunk cinematic analysis of movement

    By means of a cinematic analysis of movement, we will record the range of motion of trunk during four dynamic tasks (anterior flexion, trunk extension, right and left trunk lateral flexion).

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  3. Time Up and Go test

    Time Up and Go test (continuous variable with units of measurement: second)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  4. Inertial Gait Analysis

    Gait analysis performed Inertial Measeurement Units to assess trunk acceleration-derived gait indexes ( continuous variables without measure unit)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  5. 30 second chair stand test

    Sit to Stand Test (continuous variable with units of measurement: second)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  6. 2 minutes walking test

    2 minutes walking test (continuous variable with units of measurement: meters)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  7. Functional Independence Measure

    Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total score (continuous variable, score ranging from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater functional independence)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

  8. Visual Analogue Scale

    Visual Analogue Scale for pain (continuous variable, score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity)

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hoshiyama M, Kaneoke Y, Koike Y, Takahashi A, Watanabe S. Hypokinesia of associated movement in Parkinson's disease: a symptom in early stages of the disease. J Neurol. 1994 Aug;241(9):517-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00873512. PubMed 7798998 ↗
  • Fasano A, Geroin C, Berardelli A, Bloem BR, Espay AJ, Hallett M, Lang AE, Tinazzi M. Diagnostic criteria for camptocormia in Parkinson's disease: A consensus-based proposal. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Aug;53:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 May 8. PubMed 29759930 ↗
  • Doherty KM, van de Warrenburg BP, Peralta MC, Silveira-Moriyama L, Azulay JP, Gershanik OS, Bloem BR. Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):538-49. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70067-9. Epub 2011 Apr 22. PubMed 21514890 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The final anonymized database will be uploaded in the Zenodo platform.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07010328
Lead sponsor
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Study contacts

Roberto De Icco
Contact
roberto.deicco@mondino.it
+390382380425
Cinzia Fattore
Contact
cinzia.fattore@mondino.it
+390382380385
Luca Martinis
principal investigator · IRCCS Mondino Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion