An interventional study of cognitive behavioral play intervention in Epilepsy and Epilepsy in Children, sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-07.
Sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy interventions in patients with epilepsy.
Children with epilepsy will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention conditions: the experimental group will receive cognitive-behavioral play intervention, while the control group will engage in free play. Assessments will be done at the start (T0) and end (T1) of the intervention, measuring behaviors, coping strategies, positive thinking, problem-solving, and quality of life.
Cognitive-Behavioral Play Therapy (CBPT) adapts Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy techniques into a play-based intervention for preschool and school-age children, especially for those facing challenges like hospitalization or chronic illnesses. Studies show that play has therapeutic value, helping children understand critical events, reduce anxiety, and cope with illness. This research aims to explore how CBPT can be applied in hospitals, specifically for children with epilepsy, to improve their quality of life, enhance problem-solving, and foster positive coping strategies. The goal is to validate CBPT as a supportive tool for enhancing psycho-emotional development and complementing medical care in hospital settings.
The study proposes a randomized controlled trial with two groups: children with epilepsy will be randomly assigned to either the cognitive-behavioral play intervention or free play. The study will assess internalizing and externalizing behaviors, coping strategies, positive thinking, problem-solving skills, and quality of life at baseline (T0) and after the 8 intervention sessions (T1).
The goal is to determine whether cognitive-behavioral play improves quality of life more than free play.
Both groups will participate in 8 weekly 40-minute play sessions, with an initial and final meeting to administer the questionnaires.
The psychologist conducting the assessments will be unaware of group assignments.
The play scenarios for both groups will be identical and based on common issues faced by children with epilepsy.
1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 422 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 52 is close to the median of 50 across 1,239 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsy.
Browse Epilepsy studies →IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
For the purposes of the study, children aged between 6 and 10 years, of both sexes, will be recruited.
Exclusion criteria:
In the CBPI condition, children are given dolls and miniature props to play with, aiming to promote positive thinking. Each session includes stories on health, emotional well-being, social activities, and school life. The researcher teaches problem-solving by modeling steps like identifying the problem, generating solutions, evaluating them, and choosing the best solution. In each session, the researcher models the process four times and makes positive affirmations. The CBPI intervention and the free play control condition are similar, with both groups engaging in pretend play. The researcher uses standardized prompts and spends equal time and attention with each child. The key difference is that in the CBPI intervention, the researcher uses dolls to model positive thinking and problem-solving, while encouraging children's imagination and emotional expression. Techniques from play therapy are used to help children integrate their feelings into the stories
Behavioral: cognitive behavioral play intervention
The free play (FP) control condition allows the researcher to assess the effects of pretend play and provide positive attention to children. Children in this condition receive the same dolls and props, and hear the same stories as those in the cognitive-behavioral play intervention. After each story, they are encouraged to create their own story, but are free to play as they wish, often engaging in play unrelated to the story prompt. The researcher follows the child's lead, offering positive attention and non-specific praise but does not guide the play. The main difference between the two conditions is that in the FP condition, the researcher provides attention without directing the play, while in the intervention condition, the researcher actively guides the child's play to model problem-solving and positive thinking.
In the CBPI condition, children use dolls and miniature props to engage in play aimed at fostering positive thinking, a key element of quality of life. Each session includes stories on health, emotional well-being, social interactions, and school activities. The researcher demonstrates problem-solving steps, such as identifying and evaluating solutions, repeating this process three times. In each session, the researcher models problem-solving four times and provides at least five positive affirmations. Both the CBPI intervention and the free play control condition are similar, with the researcher using standardized prompts and providing equal time and positive attention. The key difference is that in the CBPI condition, the researcher models positive thinking and problem-solving, while in the free play condition, the researcher follows the child's lead without guiding play.
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on quality of life
To assess whether there is an improvement in the quality of life in children with epilepsy following a cognitive-behavioral play intervention , and whether these improvements are greater in this group compared to the control group. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Epilepsy Module will be used to measure the variable targeted by the intervention. The questionnaire uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never a problem) to 4 (Almost always a problem) for child and parent-report forms. For overall scores, it's possible to calculate a summary score with a range from 0 (worst possible health-related quality of life) to 100 (best possible health-related quality of life). Higher scores on the PedsQL Epilepsy Module indicate a better outcome, reflecting better health-related quality of life. Lower scores suggest a worse outcome.
Time frame: 2 months
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on coping strategies
To verify whether a cognitive-behavioral play intervention, structured according to the theoretical framework of Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy, can lead to an improvement in using standardized questionnaire The Children's Coping Strategies Checklist-Revised (CCSC-R1). The CCSC-R1 uses a Likert-type scale, typically ranging from 1 (Never use this strategy) to 5 (Always use this strategy) for each individual item. The total score depends on how the individual items are scored, but overall, higher scores represent greater use of coping strategies. Higher scores generally indicate greater use of coping strategies by the child. This is not necessarily a "better" or "worse" outcome in itself, but the effectiveness of coping strategies would depend on the context and type of coping used. For instance, adaptive coping strategies are generally considered positive, while maladaptive coping strategies might indicate poorer outcomes.
Time frame: 2 months
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on positive thinking
To verify whether a cognitive-behavioral play intervention, structured according to the theoretical framework of Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy, can lead to an improvement in positive thinking,using standardized questionnaire: Positive Thinking Checklist (Checklist sul Pensiero Positivo) The scale typically uses a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always), assessing how often an individual engages in positive thinking behaviors. Higher scores indicate more frequent use of positive thinking strategies, which generally reflect a better outcome, suggesting a more positive mindset or a greater tendency toward constructive thinking.
Time frame: 2 months
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation