ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07664930Updated Jun 24, 2026

Phrenic Nerve and Diaphragm Electrophysiology in Pompe Disease

An observational study in Pompe Disease, sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pompe disease is traditionally considered a lysosomal myopathy. However, increasing experimental and clinical evidence suggests involvement of the entire motor unit, including motor neurons, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junctions, and skeletal muscle. Respiratory impairment is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and diaphragm dysfunction is frequently observed.

Clinical observations at IRCCS Fondazione Mondino have highlighted neurophysiological abnormalities of the phrenic nerve and diaphragm in patients with Pompe disease and respiratory involvement, sometimes occurring even in the absence of clinically significant limb muscle weakness. These findings suggest that respiratory motor unit dysfunction may represent an important component of the disease phenotype.

This observational study aims to systematically characterize phrenic nerve conduction parameters and diaphragm electromyographic findings in adult patients with genetically confirmed Pompe disease and in patients with unexplained respiratory failure. Retrospective and prospective clinical, neurophysiological, and respiratory data collected during routine clinical care will be analyzed to explore whether phrenic nerve and diaphragm abnormalities may serve as markers of respiratory motor unit involvement in Pompe disease.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-interventional observational study with a mixed retrospective and prospective cohort design. No experimental treatments, additional diagnostic procedures, or study-specific interventions are introduced. All data derive exclusively from routine clinical evaluations performed as part of standard patient care. Two main populations are included: 1) Adult patients with genetically confirmed Pompe disease undergoing routine neurophysiological and respiratory assessments; 2) Patients with restrictive respiratory failure or unexplained hypoventilation who previously underwent phrenic nerve conduction studies and/or diaphragm electromyography as part of clinical workup, identified retrospectively. The retrospective component consists of systematic review of phrenic nerve conduction studies and diaphragm electromyography performed over previous years in patients with suspected neuromuscular respiratory failure. The prospective component involves standardized collection of neurophysiological and respiratory data obtained during routine follow-up of patients with confirmed Pompe disease.

Neurophysiological assessments include bilateral phrenic nerve motor conduction studies and evaluation of peripheral nerves and limb muscles. Diaphragm needle electromyography is performed only when clinically indicated. Respiratory evaluations include spirometry with forced vital capacity in seated and supine positions, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), and, when clinically required, overnight ventilation studies.

The primary outcome is the characterization of phrenic nerve conduction parameters, including motor latency, compound muscle action potential amplitude, and presence or absence of diaphragmatic responses. Secondary outcomes include diaphragm electromyographic patterns, comparison between phrenic nerve and other peripheral nerves, and correlations between neurophysiological parameters and respiratory function.

Data are collected retrospectively from medical records and prospectively during routine clinical visits, pseudonymized, and analyzed descriptively and exploratorily. The study aims to improve characterization of respiratory motor unit involvement in Pompe disease and to evaluate the potential diagnostic contribution of phrenic nerve and diaphragm electrophysiology in patients with unexplained respiratory failure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pompe Disease

Keywords

  • Pompe disease
  • Phrenic nerve
  • Diaphragm
  • Respiratory muscle weakness
  • Neuromuscular respiratory failure
  • Motor unit
03

In context

Glycogen Storage Disease Type II

162 studies on the registry are indexed under Glycogen Storage Disease Type II; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 64 observational studies indexed under Glycogen Storage Disease Type II.

Browse Glycogen Storage Disease Type II studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Approximately 20 adult patients with genetically confirmed Pompe disease are expected to be prospectively included. In addition, a retrospective review of approximately 150 previously performed phrenic nerve conduction studies and diaphragm electromyography examinations in patients with unexplained respiratory failure will be conducted. The prospective enrollment refers exclusively to newly evaluated Pompe disease patients, while the retrospective component is based on existing clinical records and neurophysiological data

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years.

For the prospective cohort:

  • Genetically confirmed diagnosis of Pompe disease.
  • Ability to undergo routine neurophysiological and respiratory assessments.
  • Written provided.

For the retrospective cohort:

  • History of restrictive respiratory failure or unexplained hypoventilation.
  • Availability of previous phrenic nerve conduction studies and/or diaphragm electromyography performed as part of routine clinical evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Age \< 18 years.

For the prospective cohort:

  • Conditions preventing completion of neurophysiological assessments (e.g., inability to maintain required positioning or relevant clinical ).
  • Known primary phrenic nerve injury (e.g., postsurgical phrenic palsy or documented traumatic phrenic neuropathy).
  • Presence of other neuromuscular disorders potentially confounding data interpretation.
  • Refusal or inability to provide .

For the retrospective cohort:

  • Incomplete or technically non-interpretable neurophysiological examinations.
  • Previously established respiratory or neuromuscular diagnoses fully explaining respiratory impairment.
  • Cases requiring additional clinical information for study purposes when patient consent for contact or data completion cannot be obtained.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor latency (ms)

    Phrenic nerve conduction parameter measured by bilateral nerve conduction studies

    Time frame: Baseline (at first available assessment, retrospective or prospective)

  2. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude (millivolts)

    Phrenic nerve conduction parameter assessed bilaterally by nerve conduction studies

    Time frame: Baseline (at first available assessment, retrospective or prospective)

  3. Presence or absence of diaphragmatic responses

    Phrenic nerve conduction parameter assessed bilaterally

    Time frame: Baseline (at first available assessment, retrospective or prospective)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurogenic pattern

    Diaphragm electromyography pattern assessed when clinically indicated

    Time frame: Baseline (at time of clinical assessment when EMG is performed)

  2. Myopathic pattern

    Diaphragm electromyography pattern assessed when clinically indicated

    Time frame: Baseline (at time of clinical assessment when EMG is performed)

  3. Mixed pattern

    Diaphragm electromyography pattern assessed when clinically indicated

    Time frame: Baseline (at time of clinical assessment when EMG is performed)

  4. Normal pattern

    Diaphragm electromyography pattern assessed when clinically indicated

    Time frame: Baseline (at time of clinical assessment when EMG is performed)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • DeRuisseau LR, Fuller DD, Qiu K, DeRuisseau KC, Donnelly WH Jr, Mah C, Reier PJ, Byrne BJ. Neural deficits contribute to respiratory insufficiency in Pompe disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9419-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902534106. Epub 2009 May 27. PubMed 19474295 ↗
  • Falk DJ, Todd AG, Lee S, Soustek MS, ElMallah MK, Fuller DD, Notterpek L, Byrne BJ. Peripheral nerve and neuromuscular junction pathology in Pompe disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Feb 1;24(3):625-36. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu476. Epub 2014 Sep 12. PubMed 25217571 ↗
  • ElMallah MK, Pagliardini S, Turner SM, Cerreta AJ, Falk DJ, Byrne BJ, Greer JJ, Fuller DD. Stimulation of Respiratory Motor Output and Ventilation in a Murine Model of Pompe Disease by Ampakines. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015 Sep;53(3):326-35. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0374OC. PubMed 25569118 ↗
  • Turner SMF, Falk DJ, Byrne BJ, Fuller DD. Transcriptome assessment of the Pompe (Gaa-/-) mouse spinal cord indicates widespread neuropathology. Physiol Genomics. 2016 Nov 1;48(11):785-794. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00075.2016. Epub 2016 Sep 9. PubMed 27614205 ↗
  • Oliveira Santos M, Domingues S, de Campos CF, Moreira S, de Carvalho M. Diaphragm weakness in late-onset Pompe disease: A complex interplay between lower motor neuron and muscle fibre degeneration. J Neurol Sci. 2024 May 15;460:123021. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123021. Epub 2024 Apr 18. PubMed 38653115 ↗
  • Spiesshoefer J, Henke C, Kabitz HJ, Brix T, Gorlich D, Herkenrath S, Randerath W, Young P, Boentert M. The nature of respiratory muscle weakness in patients with late-onset Pompe disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 Aug;29(8):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 22. PubMed 31327549 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07664930
Lead sponsor
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
Collaborators
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Start date
Mar 30, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Giuseppe Cosentino, MD
Contact
giuseppe.cosentino@mondino.it
0382380249 ext. 0039
Cinzia Fattore, MD
Contact
cinzia.fattore@unipv.it
0382380385 ext. 0039
Giuseppe Cosentino, MD
principal investigator · Translational Neurophysiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion