An observational study in Migraine Disorder and Episodic Migraine, sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-18.
Sponsored by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation · Observational
The investigators aim to assess and compare neurophysiological and biochemical changes induced by a 3-month treatment with atogepant (60 mg daily) in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days). Evaluations will include neurophysiological assessments (High-Density EEG, nociceptive reflexes, and visual evoked potentials) and biomolecular profiling (gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes, CGRP and PACAP plasma levels, and headache-specific microRNAs). Outputs will contribute to defining predictors of atogepant response, elucidating its effects on brain connectivity, excitability, and CGRP/endocannabinoid pathways, and identifying alternative therapeutic targets for non-responders.
BACKGROUND:
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease associated to a severe burden for patients and society. Despite recent advances, the knowledge of the molecular and biochemical pathways that turn on and off a migraine attack and lead to an increased frequency of attacks is still limited. In addition, the lack of predictors of the therapeutic response is a barrier to access to care and to a personalized approach. In recent years, several migraine-specific drugs have become available for the preventive treatment of the disease, which is aimed at reducing the frequency and the intensity of the attacks. Among the drugs currently available for migraine treatment, there are molecules that directly interfere with the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. Gepants, oral drugs that are CGRP receptor antagonists, represent a recently available pharmacological class for the acute and preventive treatment of migraines due to their specific mechanism of action.
The potential mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefit derived from drugs that block CGRP, as well as their impact on various biochemical and functional parameters associated with migraine pathophysiology, remains a topic of debate.
The objective of the ATOM project is to characterize the neurophysiological and biomolecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic action of Atogepant (ATO), a drug belonging to the new pharmacological class of gepants. ATO has been shown to be effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. However, preventive treatment with gepants is still ineffective (reducing the number of monthly migraine days by less than 50%) in 30% of patients. This finding suggests that other biological pathways independent of CGRP may play a role in migraine pathophysiology. Among these, the endocannabinoid system has gained increasing importance over the years.
From a neurofunctional perspective, central sensitization is a significant aspect of migraine pathophysiology. Our group has demonstrated the utility of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex at the lower limb (RIII) in studying central sensitization. A subsequent study showed improvement in RIII reflex parameters in 30% of chronic migraine patients who responded to Erenumab after three months of treatment, suggesting a potential correlation between improved central sensitization and clinical benefit from anti-CGRP antibody treatment.
Additionally, migraine patients exhibit altered responses following repeated cranial stimulation, specifically a deficit in habituation to such stimuli. It has been described that the habituation pattern follows a characteristic course throughout the migraine cycle. The habituation deficit has been demonstrated through various neurophysiological methods, such as the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). These assessments provide information about the modulation of relevant stations in the trigemino-vascular system, specifically the trigemino-cervical complex and the occipital cortex.
Our study includes an evaluation of brain functional connectivity using High-Density Electroencephalography (HD-EEG). Recently, we analyzed potential variations in functional connectivity within the Resting State Network (RSN) in migraine patients undergoing six months of treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway through serial HD-EEG evaluations (unpublished data). Our findings demonstrate that migraine patients, when compared to healthy controls, exhibit widespread hyperconnectivity in the theta and delta frequency bands, potentially attributable to dysfunction of the generators of these frequency bands, highlighting the importance of the thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia concept in migraine pathophysiology. Conversely, longitudinal comparisons revealed a trend towards normalization of connectivity in patients with a good clinical response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.
From a biochemical standpoint, our group has demonstrated that the gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes - fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) - is altered in peripheral cells of patients with episodic and chronic migraine and is correlated with migraine severity. Similarly, various literature evidence supports the role of microRNAs in the mechanisms underlying migraines. Elevated expression levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p, combined with lower levels of miR-30a-5p expression, have been found in migraine patients compared to healthy controls, confirming an epigenetic alteration. In a previous study, we reported that peripheral levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p in migraine patients were correlated with disease severity, as they were increased in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache (CM-MOH) compared to episodic migraine (EM) patients, suggesting involvement in chronicization, while not excluding an influence of pharmacological migraine treatments . Elevated levels of miR-155, a microRNA known to modulate inflammation, have been found in peripheral cells of both EM and CM-MOH patients compared to healthy controls, with higher levels in chronic patients.
The overarching aim of this project is the identification of specific neurophysiological and biomolecular signatures that differentiate subjects with migraine who benefit or do not benefit from atogepant treatment. This aim will be achieved via a thorough neurophysiological and biochemical profiling of subjects with high frequency episodic migraine treated with atogepant 60 mg for a period of 3 months.
STUDY DESIGN:
Patients will be enrolled from those attending the outpatient clinic of IRCCS Mondino Institute (Pavia). The investigators will enroll 30 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days) with clinical indications to start atogepant (ATO - 60 mg daily) according to the Italian regulations.
The investigators will collect clinical data and perform biochemical and neurofunctional profiling of migraine patients at baseline (T0) and after three months of atogepant treatment (T1).
METHODS: All patients will undergo at T0 and T1:
Biochemical profiling that will include analysis of:
The following collection methods will be adopted: • mRNA and microRNA analysis in PBMCs. Blood samples will be collected within ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid tubes, the investigators will first isolate PBMCs and total RNA. Ubiquitin C and U6 will act as housekeeping genes for genes coding for the eCBome enzymes and miRNAs. • CGRP alpha, PACAP-38 and VIP levels will be measured using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
Neurofunctional profiling that will include:
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sample size calculation was performed for the primary outcome of ATOM project (namely compare the TST threshold of the RIII reflex between T0 and T1. From previous papers, preliminary data and experience of our research group, an expected difference between the means at T0 and T1 of 2 mA is inferred, with a standard deviation of 4 mA for both measurements. The comparison will be made by t test for paired data or corresponding nonparametric test (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test), after performing a preliminary test on the normality of the data (Shapiro test). The investigators will consider a test power of β=0.8 and a 95% confidence. The suggested sample size is n=30. Regarding the co-primary outcome (Aim 2 - gene expression of MAGLs in PBMCs) a power analysis was performed, considering a significant difference between T0 and T1 of 5 RQ (standard deviation 4 and 10 respectively). Assuming a sample size of 30, the expected power is more than 80%.
1,657 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 339 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 137 across 331 observational studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.
Browse Migraine Disorders studies →IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subjects with high frequency episodic migraine attending the outpatient clinic of the Headache Science \& Neurorehabilitation Center of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy).
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
High-frequency episodic migraine patients (8-14 migraine days per months) undergoing atogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months
Drug: Atogepant 60 mg
Atogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex (continuos variable)
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex will be used to assess central sensitization after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
MAGL gene expression (continuos variable)
Changes in MAGL gene expression after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Habituation index of the nociceptive Blink Reflex (continuous variable)
"Habituation index" of the nociceptive Blink Reflex will be used to evaluate difference in brainstem habituation after three months of treatment with atogepant 60mg.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Habituation of the visual evoked potential (continuous variable)
Habituation of the visual evoked potential, assessed through P100 amplitude between the last and first block, will be used to assess changes in cortical habituation after three months of atogepant
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Functional brain connectivity (continuous variable)
Changes in functional brain connectivity, assessed through HD-EEG after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
FAAH gene expression (continuous variable)
Changes in FAAH gene expression after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of CGRP (continuous variable)
Changes in plasma levels of CGRP after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of PACAP (continuous variable)
Changes in plasma levels of PACAP after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Gene expression of miR-382-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-155 (continuous variables)
Changes in the gene expression of miR-382-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-155 after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day at the level of peripheral polymorphonuclear cells (PBMCs).
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plan to share: Undecided
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation