ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06996639BACON-RCTUpdated Dec 16, 2025

Breaking Fasts Ahead of Cardiac Caths

An interventional study of Non-Fasting and Fasting in Stable Angina (SA), Unstable Angina (UA) and NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, sponsored by University of South Florida. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-16.

Sponsored by University of South Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether fasting is necessary before urgent inpatient cardiac catheterizations. For patients presenting with urgent heart-related pain or even mild heart attacks, researchers want to know whether eating and drinking before their procedure improves comfort without raising the risk of complications.

The study will answer:

  • Does eating and drinking before the procedure improve patient comfort?
  • Does it increase the risk of adverse events like vomiting, aspiration (food or liquid entering the lungs), breathing problems, or death, etc?

Participants will be randomly assigned to either:

  • A standard fasting group (no food for 6 hours, no clear liquids for 2 hours), or
  • A no-fasting group (able to eat and drink as usual).

Patients will complete brief surveys before the procedure to assess comfort and satisfaction. Researchers will also review medical records weekly and 30 days later to monitor for safety outcomes.

Read the detailed description

While pre-procedural fasting is a longstanding tradition in cardiac catheterization, there is limited evidence supporting its necessity in low-risk patients undergoing urgent procedures for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Existing studies have lacked adequate recruitment of ACS patients, comprehensive demographic capture, and long-term outcomes.

This randomized clinical trial will enroll adult inpatients undergoing cardiac catheterization for worsening angina and low risk ACS (unstable angina, and non-high risk NSTEMI's) with planned moderate proceduralist-guided sedation. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either standard fasting (≥6 hours for solids and ≥2 hours for clear liquids) or no fasting requirement.

The primary endpoint is a composite of patient-reported outcomes assessing comfort and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes focus on clinical safety metrics, such as hemodynamic instability, aspiration pneumonia, ICU admission, procedural sedation requirements, and 30-day mortality, etc.

Proceduralists will remain unblinded; however, outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed by blinded third-party personnel. This trial aims to provide high-quality data to assess the necessity and impact of fasting in this specific patient population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stable Angina (SA)
  • Unstable Angina (UA)
  • NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI

Keywords

  • Fasting
  • NPO
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • ACS
  • Angina
  • Unstable Angina
  • Worsening Angina
  • Low Risk NSTEMI
  • NSTEMI
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Urgent Cardiac Catheterization
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Periprocedural care
  • Non-fasting
  • Safety outcomes
  • Pre-procedural protocol
  • Survey-based research
03

In context

Angina, Stable

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina, Stable; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 150 across 230 interventional studies indexed under Angina, Stable.

Browse Angina, Stable studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida is the lead sponsor of 340 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All scheduled urgent inpatient non-high risk cardiac catheterizations for worsening angina (cardiac chest pain or anginal equivalent), unstable angina, or non-high risk NSTEMI-NSTEMI's with GRACE score \<140 points) utilizing proceduralist guided sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk NSTEMI's defined as NSTEMI's with a GRACE score >140 points
  • Hemodynamic instability (\<SBP 90)
  • Unstable arrythmias
  • Chest pain to nitroglycerin drip
  • New less than 25%
  • Evidence of severe decompensated heart failure on presentation requiring BiPAP or mechanical intubation
  • Inability to consent
  • Patients \<18 years old
  • Pregnant patients
  • Need for general anesthesia
  • Acute hypoxic respiratory failure requiring >6L Nasal Cannula Supplementation, BiPAP, or invasive ventilation
  • Emergent interventions: STEMI/high risk NSTEMI
  • Need for mechanical circulatory support-ECMO, Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Fasting

    Participants in this group will follow standard pre-procedural fasting guidelines: no solid food for at least 6 hours and no clear liquids for at least 2 hours before their cardiac catheterization or "NPO at Midnight."

    Behavioral: Fasting

  • Experimental
    Non-Fasting

    Participants in this group will have no dietary restrictions before their cardiac catheterization and may eat and drink as they normally would.

    Behavioral: Non-Fasting

Interventions

  • BehavioralNon-Fasting

    No pre-procedural fasting required; participants may eat and drink as usual.

  • BehavioralFasting

    Standard pre-procedural fasting (≥6 hours for solids, ≥2 hours for clear liquids) or "NPO at Midnight."

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre-procedural patient satisfaction and comfort

    Patient satisfaction and comfort will be assessed using a six-item survey evaluating hunger, thirst, nausea, nervousness, anger, and weakness. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("strongly disagree" = least discomfort) to 5 ("strongly agree" = most discomfort). The total score ranges from 6 (best possible comfort) to 30 (worst possible discomfort). Higher scores indicate greater overall discomfort.

    Time frame: Within one hour pre-cardiac catheterization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time since last oral intake

    Time (in minutes) between last oral intake (food or fluid) as self-reported on pre-procedural survey and start of cardiac catheterization.

    Time frame: At time of procedure

  2. Hypotension

    Number of individuals with an occurrence of systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) \<65 mmHg during or within 6 hours after the procedure.

    Time frame: During procedure and up to 6 hours post-procedure

  3. Hyperglycemia

    Number of individuals with an occurrence of blood glucose \>200 mg/dL during or within 6 hours after the procedure, based on point-of-care or laboratory testing.

    Time frame: During or within 6 hours post-procedure

  4. Hypoglycemia

    Number of individuals with an occurrence of blood glucose \<70 mg/dL within 6 hours before, during, or after the procedure based on point-of-care or laboratory testing.

    Time frame: Within 6 hours pre and post-procedure

  5. New hypoxic respiratory failure

    Number of individuals with the development of new hypoxia (SpO₂ \<85% on room air or requiring supplemental oxygen \>4 L/min) during or within 6 hours post-procedure, not present prior to catheterization.

    Time frame: During or with 6 hours post-procedure, not present prior to catheterization.

  6. Aspiration pneumonia

    Number of individuals with a new diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia within 72 hours post-procedure, based on new pulmonary infiltrate on imaging plus clinical signs (e.g., cough, fever, hypoxia), not present prior to procedure.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours post-procedure, not present prior to catheterization.

  7. New non-invasive or invasive ventilation

    Number of individuals with the initiation of CPAP, BiPAP, or endotracheal intubation during the procedure or within 24 hours post-procedure.

    Time frame: During or within 24 hours post-procedure

  8. New intensive care unit (ICU) admission

    Number of individuals with a new admission to an ICU within 24 hours post-procedure that was not planned prior to catheterization.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours post-procedure

  9. Need for emergency surgical intervention

    Number of individuals with an unplanned surgical procedure initiated during or within 24 hours after catheterization as a result of a procedural complication.

    Time frame: During or within 24 hours post-procedure

  10. 30-day mortality

    To be gathered by chart review 30 days post-procedure.

    Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

  11. Sedation use

    Total volume (mg or mcg) of midazolam and fentanyl administered during the procedure, as documented in the procedural record.

    Time frame: During procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
    Recruiting
    • Samip Vasaiwala, MD · ContactSamipv@usf.edu · 312-375-8104
    • University of South Florida IRB · ContactRSCH-IRB@usf.edu
    • Samip Vasaiwala, MD · Principal investigator
    • Matthew Almonte, MD · Sub investigator
    • Afrin Naz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Adam Fennell, MD · Sub investigator
    • Mishal Mumtaz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Marilyn Joseph, APRN · Sub investigator
    • Vincent Sachs, MD · Sub investigator
    • Rahul Mhaskar, MPH, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Jason Lee, Medical Student · Sub investigator
    • Julia Eazer, Medical Student · Sub investigator
    • Katherine Achinger, Medical Student · Sub investigator
    • Victoria Pitenis, APRN · Sub investigator
    • Matthew Nalls, MD · Sub investigator
    • Chirag Lodha, DO · Sub investigator
    • Paul Slota, MD · Sub investigator
    • Jacob Thomas, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitchell BK, Tomdio A, Pir MS, Mishra SK, Dayanand P, Bonnet G, Alu MC, Gertz ZM. A Randomized Trial of Cardiac Catheterization With Fasting Versus Liberal Oral Intake: The CALORI Trial. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Oct 24;3(12):102291. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102291. eCollection 2024 Dec. PubMed 39807233 ↗
  • Woods C, Wood M, Boylan A, Flanagan ME, Powers J. Fasting Versus a Heart-Healthy Diet Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Crit Care. 2024 Jan 1;33(1):29-33. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2024115. PubMed 38161168 ↗
  • Saad M, Waqas SA, Aamir J, Sohail MU, Ansari I, Mohan A, Kumar V, Alraies MC. Fasting Versus Nonfasting Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;238:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.11.030. Epub 2024 Nov 28. PubMed 39613281 ↗
  • Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, Van De Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KA; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2345-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345. PubMed 14581255 ↗
  • Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017 Mar;126(3):376-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452. No abstract available. PubMed 28045707 ↗
  • Mishra A. Strict versus no fasting prior to cardiac catheterization: a prospective evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. Can we safely have our patients eat with cardiac catheterization - nix or allow: the CHOW NOW study [abstract 11758].SCAI 2020 Virtual Scientific Sessions: Virtual Conference, May 14 to 16, 2020.
  • Ferreira D, Hardy J, Meere W, Butel-Simoes L, McGee M, Whitehead N, Healey P, Ford T, Oldmeadow C, Attia J, Wilsmore B, Collins N, Boyle A. Safety and care of no fasting prior to catheterization laboratory procedures: a non-inferiority randomized control trial protocol (SCOFF trial). Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Oct 17;3(6):oead111. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead111. eCollection 2023 Nov. PubMed 38025651 ↗
  • Tamborrino PP, Papi L, Michelotti L, Vitale C, Caravelli P, Petronio AS, Terlizzi E, Della Volpe L, Virlan M, Sardanelli A, Morganti R, De Caterina R. Do We Need Fasting Prior to Coronary Angiography? The CORO-NF Randomized Pragmatic Study. Am J Med. 2024 Jul;137(7):666-672. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.024. Epub 2024 Feb 7. PubMed 38336086 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The de-identified individual participant data (IPD) dataset will include information necessary to support the primary and secondary outcome findings.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD will be made available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years after the publication of results.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available only upon request by ICMJE-affiliated journal editors or peer reviewers during the manuscript review and publication process. Data will not be shared with other external researchers or institutions. The dataset will include information necessary to support the primary and secondary outcome findings. No open-access sharing is planned. Requests for IPD must be submitted directly to the principal investigator via email. A data sharing agreement will be required to ensure confidentiality and appropriate use. The study principal investigator and research team will review each request to confirm it originates from a journal editor or peer reviewer and that the purpose aligns with manuscript review or publication. Once approved, access will be provided via a secure, encrypted file transfer. All data will be de-identified in accordance with HIPAA standards, and no identifiers will be included.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 8 months after the start.

Of 65 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Angina, Stable, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 76 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2025
First posted
May 30, 2025
StartActual
Oct 13, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2026
Last update
Dec 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06996639
Responsible party
Samip Vasaiwala (Primary Investigator, University of South Florida) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 30, 2025
Start date
Oct 13, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 16, 2025

Study contacts

Samip Vasaiwala, MD
Contact
samipv@usf.edu
312-375-8104
USF Institutional Review Board
Contact
RSCH-IRB@usf.edu
Samip Vasaiwala, MD
principal investigator · USF Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion