ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06982625SOSBIFSIUpdated Sep 25, 2025

Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block as Rescue Analgesia Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

An interventional study of Ultrasound guided supra inguinal fascia iliaca block and Placebo Injection in Hip Arthroplasty, Total, Post Operative Pain, Acute and Nerve Block, sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-25.

Sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 102 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in France — 18 open to participants now, 21 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Pain, Postoperative · France.

Planned enrollment
14th of 83
310 · median 140
Started
2025
with 3 others
No phase
41 of 102
11 open now
Primary completion
2027-09
later than 12 of 20 live
Registered
89th of 102
by date

Among the 102 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in France, this one is the 14th largest by planned enrollment of the 83 interventional ones, is one of 4 that started in 2025, is one of 41 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 12 of the 20 other live ones, and was the 89th registered.

By phase

102 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study41 · 11 open
Observational19 · 2 open
Phase 319 · 3 open
Phase 210 · 1 open
Phase 410 · 1 open
Phase 2/33 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2025.

Size and results

Median enrollment 140 across the 83 interventional studies, 135 across the 19 observational. Of the 71 that completed or were terminated, 5 (7%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 102 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Hip replacement surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in France, with approximately 150,000 procedures per year. Postoperative recovery has significantly improved in recent years, enabling faster rehabilitation.

Although generally considered moderately painful, hip replacement surgery can, in some difficult-to-predict cases, lead to severe postoperative pain, requiring high doses of morphine, which may cause side effects and delay recovery.

In other surgical procedures, regional anesthesia (nerve blocks) has been successfully used for pain relief. However, its effectiveness after hip replacement surgery has not yet been fully proven.

A recent regional anesthesia technique-the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB)-which numbs a significant portion of the nerves around the hip, has recently been developed.

When performed in all patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, the benefit of this technique could not be demonstrated. In addition, this technique may lead to transcient muscle blockade, wich also can delay recovery.

In order to limit the use of nerve blocks to painful patients, we designed this study where the nerve block is performed only in patients experiencing significant paint after surgery.

In conclusion, this study aims to assess the benefits of performing a rescue SIFIB in the recovery room for patients who experience significant postoperative pain after hip replacement surgery. The evaluation will focus on pain relief and ability to walk.

No new treatment is being tested. The technique uses a commonly administered local anesthetic to numb the nerves.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hip Arthroplasty, Total
  • Post Operative Pain, Acute
  • Nerve Block

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Regional anesthesia
  • Nerve blocks
  • Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • Acute post-operative pain
  • Rescue analgesia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia,
  • written .

Non inclusion criteria:

  • contra indication to ropivacaine
  • vulnerable person

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • per-operative complication making wheight-bearing and walking .
  • patient without significant pain post-operatively.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SIFIB group

    The ultrasound probe is placed in a cephalo-caudal orientation, over the inguinal ligament, lateral to the femoral nerve. The iliacus muscle, which is covered caudally by the sartorius muscle and cephalically by the internal oblique muscle, is visualized in depth. Between these two muscles, an area is identified where the iliacus muscle is covered only by subcutaneous tissue. The needle is introduced in a cranio-caudal direction, and the injection is initiated in this area, beneath the fascia iliaca. The needle then advances through the space created by the injection, as far as possible in a cephalic direction, beneath the internal oblique muscle. An injection of 40 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine is administered.

    Procedure: Ultrasound guided supra inguinal fascia iliaca block · Procedure: Surgical and anesthetic protocol

  • Sham comparator
    Placebo group

    Five milliliters of saline are injected subcutaneously under ultrasound guidance

    Procedure: Placebo Injection · Procedure: Surgical and anesthetic protocol

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound guided supra inguinal fascia iliaca block

    The ultrasound probe is placed in a cephalo-caudal orientation, over the inguinal ligament, lateral to the femoral nerve. The iliacus muscle, which is covered caudally by the sartorius muscle and cephalically by the internal oblique muscle, is visualized in depth. Between these two muscles, an area is identified where the iliacus muscle is covered only by subcutaneous tissue. The needle is introduced in a cranio-caudal direction, and the injection is initiated in this area, beneath the fascia iliaca. The needle then advances through the space created by the injection, as far as possible in a cephalic direction, beneath the internal oblique muscle. An injection of 40 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine is administered.

  • ProcedurePlacebo Injection

    Five milliliters of saline are injected subcutaneously under ultrasound guidance

  • ProcedureSurgical and anesthetic protocol

    All patients receive standard general anesthesia: * Induction of anesthesia by sufentanil, ketamine, propofol and tracrium if needed, * Maintenance of anesthesia by sevoflurane and sufentanil if needed, * Prevention of PONV by dexamethasone and droperidol, * Post-operative analgesia by paracetamol, ketoprofene, nefopam, as indicated. Total hip arthroplasty is performed by anterior or postero-lateral approach, depending on surgeon preference. In the post-anesthesia care unit, if numerical pain rating scale at rest is \>=4, patients are randomized to receive experimental or placebo intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite outcome

    Composite outcome is validated if all of these 3 items are validated: * numerical pain rating scale (from 0 to 10) at rest is \< 4, * and intravenous morphine \< 0,1 mg/kg, * and first mobilization successful. First mobilization is validated if patient can stand up, walk 5 meters then sit down in a wheelchair.

    Time frame: 2 hours post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Morphine consumption

    oral morphine equivalent needings

    Time frame: 24 hours post operatively

  2. Pain evaluation

    Numerical pain rating scale (0-10=) at rest Numerical rating scale for pain is described as a scale from a minimum of 0, associated with no pain, to a maximum of 10, associated with the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 hours post operatively

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Number of in-hospital post operative nights

    Time frame: An average of 2 to 3 days up to 1 week

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction assessment on pain management, using a 5-degrees Likert scale. (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied)

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Desmet M, Vermeylen K, Van Herreweghe I, Carlier L, Soetens F, Lambrecht S, Croes K, Pottel H, Van de Velde M. A Longitudinal Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Reduces Morphine Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):327-333. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000543. PubMed 28059869 ↗
  • Zhang XY, Ma JB. The efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for pain control after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1053-1. PubMed 30683117 ↗
  • Changjun C, Xin Z, Yue L, Liyile C, Pengde K. Key Elements of Enhanced Recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Reanalysis of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Guidelines. Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):671-678. doi: 10.1111/os.13623. Epub 2023 Jan 3. PubMed 36597677 ↗
  • Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Sache F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Aug;42(4):101264. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264. Epub 2023 Jun 7. PubMed 37295649 ↗
  • Anger M, Valovska T, Beloeil H, Lirk P, Joshi GP, Van de Velde M, Raeder J; PROSPECT Working Group* and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 Aug;76(8):1082-1097. doi: 10.1111/anae.15498. Epub 2021 May 20. PubMed 34015859 ↗
  • Memtsoudis SG, Cozowicz C, Bekeris J, Bekere D, Liu J, Soffin EM, Mariano ER, Johnson RL, Go G, Hargett MJ, Lee BH, Wendel P, Brouillette M, Kim SJ, Baaklini L, Wetmore DS, Hong G, Goto R, Jivanelli B, Athanassoglou V, Argyra E, Barrington MJ, Borgeat A, De Andres J, El-Boghdadly K, Elkassabany NM, Gautier P, Gerner P, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Goytizolo E, Guo Z, Hogg R, Kehlet H, Kessler P, Kopp S, Lavand'homme P, Macfarlane A, MacLean C, Mantilla C, McIsaac D, McLawhorn A, Neal JM, Parks M, Parvizi J, Peng P, Pichler L, Poeran J, Poultsides L, Schwenk ES, Sites BD, Stundner O, Sun EC, Viscusi E, Votta-Velis EG, Wu CL, YaDeau J, Sharrock NE. Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) group based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Nov;46(11):971-985. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102750. Epub 2021 Aug 25. PubMed 34433647 ↗
  • Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3. PubMed 23392233 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 29, 2025
First posted
May 21, 2025
StartActual
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 22, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06982625
Lead sponsor
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Responsible party
Abderrahmen BARGAOUI (Principal Investigator, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 21, 2025
Start date
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 22, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2025

Study contacts

Chahrazad Bey Boumezrag
Contact
chahrazad.beyboumezrag@imm.fr
+33 156616983
Abderrahmen BARGAOUI, MD
principal investigator · Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion