CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06647251QDOTUpdated Oct 17, 2024

Comparison of 3 RF Delivery Modes of the QDOT Catheter for Paroxymal Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation

An interventional study of Q-MODE : radiofrequency ablation up to 50W and Q-MODE+ : radiofrequency up to 90W in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.

Sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary vein isolation is the main treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

The aim of our study is to prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of the 3 options of radiofrequency delivery with QDOT Micro™, with systematic use of catheter stabilization tools and tighter lesions

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the main treatment of paroxysmal and persistant atrial fibrillation.

PVI is achieved by point-by-point radiofrequency ablation that creates flexible lesion set within targeted area.

PVI using standard ablation catheter with limited power (50W) have been described in case series with favorable efficacy and safety.

QDOTMicro™ is a radiofrequency ablation catheter that incorporates advanced, high-energy ablation, improved temperature monitoring, optimized irrigation, and higher signal resolution.

QDOT Micro™ provides several options regarding radiofrequency administration :

  • Q-MODE : provides high power short duration (HPSD) unitl 50W radiofrequency,
  • Q-MODE+ : provides very high power very short duration (vHSPD) until 90W radiofrequency,
  • Hybrid Q-MODE/Q-MODE+ : is a combination of two methods. In our experience, stability is a prerequisite for PVI with QDOT Micro™.

Small series have described encouraging results (85% isolation, unpublished data) with stabilization tools such as low-volume ventilation or apnea, high-rate simualtion, Vizigo bi-directional sheath (Vizigo™).

Recently, preliminary animal data argue in favor or reducing the interpoint distance with QDOT™.

To date, there is no study comparing the 3 options of radiofrequency delivery. The aim of our study is to prospectively compare the efficacity and safety of the 3 options of radiofrequency delivery with QDOT Micro™, with systematic use of catheter stabilization tools and tighter lesions.

The same device is used in all three randomisation groups. The difference between the intervention is the intensity of the radiofrequency applied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged 18 or over
  • First atrial fibrillation ablation
  • Paroxysmal atrial fibillation defined as atrial fibrillation lasting less than 48 hours
  • Early atrial fibrillation defined as atrial fibrillation lastiing between 7 days and 3 months
  • At least one episode of atrial fibrillation in the year preceding study entry
  • Patient affiliated to a health insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of atrial fibrillation ablation (surgery or catheter)
  • Documented left atrial thrombus
  • Left atrial (LA) diameter > 60mm / LA area > 35cm2 / Left atrial volulme index (LAVI) > 45ml/m2
  • N/STEMI replacement or angioplasty or valve within 3 months prior to registration
  • Any contraindication mentioned in the instructions for use of the QDOT MICRO™ bidirectional navigation catheter
  • Patient unable to understand study information
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Q-MODE

    Radiofrequency ablation with High Power - Short Duration (HPSD) up to 50W.

    Procedure: Q-MODE : radiofrequency ablation up to 50W

  • Active comparator
    Q-MODE+

    Radiofrequency ablation with High Power - Short Duration (HPSD) up to 90W.

    Procedure: Q-MODE+ : radiofrequency up to 90W

  • Active comparator
    Hybride Q-MODE/Q-MODE+

    A combination of the two ablation methods.

    Procedure: Hybride Q-MODE/Q-MODE+: radiofrequency ablation up to 50W in the anterior part, and 90W in the posterior part

Interventions

  • ProcedureQ-MODE : radiofrequency ablation up to 50W

    The same device (QDOT Micro™) is used in all 3 arms of this trial. The 3 strategies of radiofrequency delivery within the 3 arms are already used in the standard of care. For patient randomized in this arm, the device is set to Q-MODE option: the intensity of radiofrequency to isolate the pulmonary vein is limited to 50W.

  • ProcedureQ-MODE+ : radiofrequency up to 90W

    The same device (QDOT Micro™) is used in all 3 arms of this trial. The 3 strategies of radiofrequency delivery within the 3 arms are already used in the standard of care. For patient randomized in this arm, the device is set to Q-MODE+ option: the intensity of radiofrequency to isolate the pulmonary vein is limited to 90W.

  • ProcedureHybride Q-MODE/Q-MODE+: radiofrequency ablation up to 50W in the anterior part, and 90W in the posterior part

    The same device (QDOT Micro™) is used in all 3 arms of this trial. The 3 strategies of radiofrequency delivery within the 3 arms are already used in the standard of care. For patient randomized in this arm, the device is set to "Q-MODE/Q-MODE+" option: the intensity of radiofrequency delivered to isolate the pulmonary vein is limited to 50W in the anterior part and to 90W in the posterior part.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of primary adverse events related to the ablation procedure

    Incidence of primary adverse events within 7 days after ablation in the 3 arms

    Time frame: 7 days after ablation

  2. Acute procedural success

    Acute procedural success is defined as electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of serious adverse event

    Incidence of serious adverse events

    Time frame: within 7 days (early onset), 7 to 30 days (periprocedural), up to 18 months (late onset) of the ablation procedure

  2. Rate of additional lesions

    Rate of additional lesions between all targeted veins and per subject

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  3. Location of additional lesions

    Anatomical location of additional lesions

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  4. Use of another catheter

    Use of another catheter than QDOT in all targeted veins

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  5. Time spent in operating room

    Time spent in operating room

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  6. Skin-to-skin time

    Skin-to-skin time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  7. Glove-to-glove time

    Glove-to-glove time = total procedure time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  8. Mapping time

    Mapping time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  9. Total ablation time

    Total ablation time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  10. Left vein ablation time

    Left vein ablation time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  11. Right vein ablation time

    Right vein ablation time

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  12. Number of radiofrequency applications

    Number of radiofrequency applications

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  13. Number of vHPSD radiofrequency applications

    Number of vHPSD (very High Power Short Duration) radiofrequency applications

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  14. Number of HPSD radiofrequency applications

    Number of HPSD (High Power Short Duration) radiofrequency applications

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  15. Temperature

    Temperature

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  16. Power

    Power

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  17. Contact force

    Contact force

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

  18. Impedance

    Impedance

    Time frame: At the end of the ablation procedure

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
    Paris, 75014, France
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06647251
Lead sponsor
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 17, 2024
Start date
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 17, 2024

Study contacts

Naly ANDRIAMBAO
Contact
naly.andriambao@imm.fr
+33156616439
Frédéric SEBAG
principal investigator · Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion