ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07919756RECUP-NVMUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Nerve Block of the Vastus Medialis and Anterior Obturator Branch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With DIDT Graft

An interventional study of Femoral Nerve Block and iPACK Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery, sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior obturator nerve branch block, and an iPACK block improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon (semitendinosus and gracilis; DIDT) graft, compared with the standard analgesic protocol used in participating centres, consisting of a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block.

The main question the study aims to answer is whether this targeted combination of nerve blocks, compared with the standard femoral nerve block plus iPACK regimen, improves the quality of postoperative recovery, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery.

The study hypothesis is that the targeted adductor canal + NVM + anterior obturator branch + iPACK strategy will significantly improve postoperative recovery quality at 24 hours compared with the standard femoral nerve block + iPACK protocol, with an expected improvement of at least 8 points on the QoR-15 score. This 8-point difference represents the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire (Léger et al., 2020). The QoR-15 is a validated global recovery assessment tool, available in French, and sensitive to variations in recovery quality in outpatient orthopedic surgery (Nakase et al., 2021). An improvement of at least 8 points at 24 hours would therefore indicate a clinically meaningful benefit from the patient's perspective.

The study will also assess:

  • Postoperative pain at rest and during mobilization.
  • Opioid consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery.
  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
  • Time to first ambulation.
  • Postoperative thigh edema.
  • Neuromuscular recovery of the thigh.
  • Patient satisfaction with analgesic management.
  • Adverse events related to regional anesthesia.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. All participants will undergo ACL reconstruction with a DIDT graft. Participants in the comparator group will receive a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block. Participants in the intervention group will receive a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior branch of the obturator nerve block, and an iPACK block.

Postoperative assessments will include pain scores, QoR-15 questionnaires, opioid consumption, nausea and vomiting, thigh measurements, and neuromuscular function assessments during the first 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction and safety outcomes will also be assessed during follow-up.

The primary outcome will compare the QoR-15 score at 24 hours between the two groups, with an 8-point difference considered clinically meaningful.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ACL reconstruction
  • DIDT graft
  • QoR-15
  • Postoperative pain
  • Vastus medialis nerve block
  • iPACK block
  • Femoral nerve block
  • Adductor canal block
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,265 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,165 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 108 is above the median of 75 across 4,496 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years.
  • Patients with a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
  • Patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction using a DIDT graft under general anesthesia.
  • Patients managed as ambulatory surgery or short stay.
  • Patients who understand the validated French version of the QoR-15 questionnaire.
  • Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with allergy to local anesthetics or a contraindication to peripheral nerve blocks.
  • Patients with lower-limb neuropathy.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders or on major anticoagulation.
  • Patients with chronic pain requiring more than 30 mg morphine-equivalents per day.
  • Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction or a major combined surgical procedure.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients unable to complete the questionnaires or who refuse to participate.
  • Pregnant women or women who may be pregnant (of childbearing potential without effective contraception) or who are breastfeeding.
  • Protected adults: patients under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty, or unable to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks

    Participants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive a targeted regional anesthesia protocol consisting of an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an iPACK block, and a block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve.

    Procedure: iPACK Block · Procedure: Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block · Procedure: Anterior Obturator Nerve Block · Procedure: Adductor Canal Block

  • Active comparator
    Femoral + iPACK Nerve Blocks

    Participants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive the standard regional anesthesia protocol consisting of a femoral nerve block and an iPACK block, without additional nerve blocks of the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) or anterior branch of the obturator nerve.

    Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block · Procedure: iPACK Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureFemoral Nerve Block

    Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block administered as part of the standard regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction.

  • ProcedureiPACK Block

    Ultrasound-guided infiltration between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) administered as part of the regional anesthesia protocol.

  • ProcedureNerve to Vastus Medialis Block

    Ultrasound-guided nerve block targeting the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM), administered in addition to theadductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm.

  • ProcedureAnterior Obturator Nerve Block

    Ultrasound-guided block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve, administered in addition to the adductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm.

  • ProcedureAdductor Canal Block

    Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block administered as part of the targeted regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction in the experimental arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Score

    The quality of postoperative recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The QoR-15 score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery. The primary analysis will compare the change in QoR-15 score from baseline to 24 hours postoperatively between the experimental and active comparator groups. An 8-point difference between groups is considered the minimal clinically important difference.

    Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively, before regional anesthesia) and 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), both at rest and during mobilization. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Total opioid consumption will be recorded and converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME).

    Time frame: 24 and 48 hours after surgery

  3. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 and 48 hours after surgery

  4. Time to ambulation

    Time from completion of surgery to first postoperative ambulation will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0 (postoperative)

  5. Postoperative Thigh Edema

    Postoperative changes in thigh circumference will be measured at three standardized locations: 15 cm above the superior pole of the patella, at the level of the patellar apex, and 10 cm below the patellar apex.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery

  6. Postoperative Neuromuscular Recovery of the Thigh

    Neuromuscular recovery will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no muscle contraction) to 5 (normal muscle strength), across four motor tests: isometric heel press into the mattress, flattening of the popliteal fossa against the mattress, sliding knee flexion/extension, and straight-leg raise at 30 degrees.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery

  7. Patient Satisfaction With Analgesic Management

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesic management will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

  8. Adverse Events Related to Regional Anesthesia

    Adverse events related to locoregional anesthesia will be recorded, including signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) and persistent paresthesia.

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nakase J, Shimozaki K, Asai K, Yoshimizu R, Kimura M, Tsuchiya H. Usefulness of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in combination with femoral nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):455-460. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03724-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2. PubMed 33386977 ↗
  • Leger M, Campfort M, Cayla C, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E. Validation of an alternative French version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score: the FQoR-15. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):e345-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.052. Epub 2020 Jul 9. No abstract available. PubMed 32654751 ↗
  • Le Bescond V, Petit-Phan J, Campfort M, Nicolleau C, Conte M, Bouhours G, Rony L, Lasocki S, Leger M. Validation of the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire after emergency surgery and association with quality of life at three months. Can J Anaesth. 2024 May;71(5):590-599. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02722-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19. PubMed 38504036 ↗
  • Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158. PubMed 27159009 ↗
  • Uddin I, Chazapis M. Obturator nerve block [Internet]. World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists; juin 2024 [cité 4 févr 2026]. https://resources.wfsahq.org/atotw/obturator-nerve-block/ doi:10.28923/atotw.525
  • Savalli L, Hernandez-Sendin MI, Puig PL, Trouve P. [Pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: detail and treatment]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004 Aug;47(6):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.005. French. PubMed 15297120 ↗
  • Demumieux F, Ludes PO, Diemunsch P, Bennett-Guerrero E, Lujic M, Lefebvre F, Noll E. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PubMed 32303379 ↗
  • Kim KY, Huh YG, Ma SH, Yoon JH, Jeong KY, Park DY, Yoon SH. Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block on Medial Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Single-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215419. PubMed 36430138 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 12 months later.

Of 1,916 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,929 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 30, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 15, 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07919756
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Yoann ELMALEH
Contact
yoann.d.elmaleh@gmail.com
+33 07 81 33 04 31
Yoann ELMALEH
principal investigator · Hôpital Privé Claude Galien

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion