ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06960330Updated Oct 22, 2026

Wearable Biofeedback Devices for Remote Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

An interventional study of Wearable Biofeedback + Virtual Physiotherapy and Standard Physiotherapy Exercises in Arthritis, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Karachi. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by University of Karachi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationStart date moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of wearable biofeedback devices in improving pain, mobility, and rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients with arthritis and fibromyalgia in Karachi, Pakistan. In a randomized controlled trial involving 120 participants, one group will use biofeedback-integrated devices with guided exercises and virtual consultations, while the control group receives standard physiotherapy. The results will inform the potential of digital health solutions to improve accessibility and outcomes in remote rehabilitation for chronic pain management.

Read the detailed description

Arthritis and fibromyalgia are chronic musculoskeletal conditions that contribute to persistent pain, functional limitations, reduced mobility, and impaired quality of life among older adults. Access to consistent physiotherapy may be challenging in Karachi, Pakistan, particularly for individuals experiencing mobility restrictions, transportation difficulties, financial limitations, and barriers to regular healthcare access. Wearable biofeedback technology may offer an accessible approach to supporting individualized, home-based rehabilitation.

This study is designed as an eight-week, single-blind (outcome-assessor-blinded), two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable biofeedback-supported remote physiotherapy compared with standard home-based physiotherapy among adults aged 60-80 years diagnosed with arthritis or fibromyalgia.

A total of 120 eligible participants will be recruited and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group (n=60) or control group (n=60). Randomization will be stratified according to baseline pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 4-6 versus 7-10) and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go [TUG] test \<13.5 seconds versus ≥13.5 seconds). A computer-generated random allocation sequence with randomly varying block sizes will be used, with allocation concealed until enrollment and baseline assessment are completed.

Participants in the intervention group will receive individualized home-based physiotherapy supported by wearable biofeedback devices providing real-time physiological and movement-related feedback. The exercise program will be tailored according to pain severity, mobility limitations, range of motion, and clinical presentation. Weekly remote physiotherapy consultations will support exercise progression, symptom monitoring, adherence, and patient safety.

Participants in the control group will receive individualized home-based physiotherapy without wearable biofeedback support. They will follow prescribed exercise routines supported by educational materials and prerecorded instructional videos, with remote physiotherapy consultations conducted every two weeks. Both treatment groups will participate in the intervention for eight weeks.

Outcome assessments will be performed at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 4), and post-intervention (week 8). The single primary outcome will be pain intensity measured using the VAS, with the principal treatment comparison performed at week 8 after adjustment for baseline pain intensity. Secondary outcomes will include functional mobility, joint range of motion, heart rate variability, exercise adherence, psychological well-being, health-related quality of life, and intervention usability and satisfaction.

The statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Linear mixed-effects models will be used to evaluate longitudinal treatment effects and account for correlations between repeated observations. The primary treatment effect will be reported as the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in pain intensity at week 8, together with its 95% confidence interval. Missing-data patterns will be documented, and appropriate sensitivity analyses will be conducted.

The study aims to determine whether wearable biofeedback-supported remote rehabilitation provides additional benefits in pain management, functional mobility, and rehabilitation adherence compared with standard home-based physiotherapy. The findings may inform future development of accessible technology-assisted rehabilitation approaches for older adults in resource-constrained healthcare settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Chronic Pain
03

In context

Arthritis

843 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 118 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 97 across 599 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Karachi is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Elderly adults aged 60-80 years diagnosed with arthritis or fibromyalgia.

Experiencing moderate to severe pain and mobility limitations.

No recent surgical interventions or for physiotherapy.

Access to smartphones and internet connectivity for remote monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with severe cognitive impairments affecting adherence to rehabilitation.

Presence of comorbidities that contraindicate physiotherapy (e.g., severe cardiac conditions).

Lack of access to digital devices required for remote monitoring.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Participants will receive individualized home-based physiotherapy supported by wearable biofeedback devices providing real-time feedback. Exercise plans will be tailored according to pain intensity, functional mobility, range of motion, and clinical presentation. Weekly remote physiotherapy consultations will support monitoring, adherence, and exercise progression. The intervention will last eight weeks.

    Other: Wearable Biofeedback + Virtual Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants will receive individualized home-based physiotherapy without wearable biofeedback devices. Exercise plans will be tailored according to baseline clinical assessments. Participants will receive exercise manuals and prerecorded instructional materials, with remote physiotherapy consultations conducted every two weeks. The intervention will last eight weeks.

    Other: Standard Physiotherapy Exercises

Interventions

  • OtherWearable Biofeedback + Virtual Physiotherapy

    Participants will use wearable devices designed to monitor physiological parameters and provide real-time feedback during exercises. The intervention includes remote guidance from physiotherapists via virtual consultations.

  • OtherStandard Physiotherapy Exercises

    Participants will be given printed or video instructions for standard physiotherapy exercises commonly used for arthritis and fibromyalgia management, without any digital monitoring or remote guidance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity Measured Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary treatment effect will be the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in pain intensity at week 8.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (primary endpoint at Week 8).

  2. Functional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)

    Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test. Participants will be timed as they rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down again.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  3. Range of Motion (Goniometry)

    Joint range of motion will be measured using a goniometer to assess changes in movement capacity of affected joints (e.g., knees, shoulders).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)

    Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The time required to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down will be recorded in seconds. Lower times indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  2. Joint Range of Motion (Goniometry)

    Joint range of motion will be assessed using standardized goniometric measurements of prespecified affected joints. Measurements will be recorded in degrees to evaluate changes in joint mobility during rehabilitation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  3. Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

    Heart rate variability will be evaluated using time-domain measures, including the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and frequency-domain measures, including the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  4. Exercise Adherence

    Adherence to prescribed home-based physiotherapy will be evaluated using available application or wearable usage logs and physiotherapist monitoring records, documenting participants' engagement with prescribed exercise sessions.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  5. Change in Depression Severity (Beck Depression Inventory)

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), with scores ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  6. Device Usability (System Usability Scale)

    Usability of the wearable biofeedback system will be assessed using the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability. This outcome applies to participants using the wearable device.

    Time frame: Week 8

  7. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36)

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), covering eight health domains. Domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction With Remote Rehabilitation

    Measure Description: Participant satisfaction with the assigned rehabilitation program will be assessed at the end of the eight-week intervention using the prespecified participant satisfaction questionnaire.

    Time frame: Week 8.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akhter E, Bilal S, Kiani A, Haque U. Prevalence of arthritis in India and Pakistan: a review. Rheumatol Int. 2011 Jul;31(7):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1820-3. Epub 2011 Feb 18. PubMed 21331574 ↗
  • Dagnino APA, Campos MM. Chronic Pain in the Elderly: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 3;16:736688. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.736688. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35308613 ↗
  • Danilin LK, Spindler M, Soros P, Bantel C. Heart rate and heart rate variability in patients with chronic inflammatory joint disease: the role of pain duration and the insular cortex. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 21;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05009-1. PubMed 35062938 ↗
  • Dudarev V, Barral O, Radaeva M, Davis G, Enns JT. Night time heart rate predicts next-day pain in fibromyalgia and primary back pain. Pain Rep. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):e1119. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001119. eCollection 2024 Apr. PubMed 38322354 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Oct 22, 2026
Start date
May 6, 2025→Dec 1, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedPain Intensity Measured Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS Score)) at Week 8Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (primary endpoint at Week 8).
Oct 22, 2026
Secondary outcomes
3 edited, 1 time frame changed, 4 added, 1 removed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedPatientExercise AdherenceTime frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • EditedChange in Depression Severity (Beck Depression Inventory Score)Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • EditedChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36 Health Survey Score)Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • AddedFunctional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • AddedJoint Range of Motion (Goniometry)Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • AddedDevice Usability (System Usability Scale)Time frame: Week 8
  • RemovedSystem Usability and Patient SatisfactionTime frame: Week 12
  • Time frameHeart Rate Variability (HRV)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
  • DescriptionHeart Rate Variability (HRV): how it is measured was reworded
  • Addedother outcomePatient Satisfaction With Remote RehabilitationTime frame: Week 8.
Oct 22, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed s•••@aeirc-edu.com · •••9258
Oct 22, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • University of Karachi · Karachi, PakistanContact removed (no phone or email listed)
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    Start date May 6, 2025→Dec 1, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedPain Intensity Measured Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS Score)) at Week 8Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (primary endpoint at Week 8).
    Secondary outcomes 3 edited, 1 time frame changed, 4 added, 1 removed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedPatientExercise AdherenceTime frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • EditedChange in Depression Severity (Beck Depression Inventory Score)Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • EditedChange in Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36 Health Survey Score)Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • AddedFunctional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • AddedJoint Range of Motion (Goniometry)Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • AddedDevice Usability (System Usability Scale)Time frame: Week 8
    • RemovedSystem Usability and Patient SatisfactionTime frame: Week 12
    • Time frameHeart Rate Variability (HRV)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12 → Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    • DescriptionHeart Rate Variability (HRV): how it is measured was reworded
    • Addedother outcomePatient Satisfaction With Remote RehabilitationTime frame: Week 8.
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed s•••@aeirc-edu.com · •••9258
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • University of Karachi · Karachi, PakistanContact removed (no phone or email listed)
    + 4 other changes: index terms, verification date, description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06960330
Lead sponsor
University of Karachi
Collaborators
Advanced Education & Research Center
Responsible party
Shamoon Noushad (Professor, University of Karachi) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Basit Ansari, Ph.D.
study director · University of Karachi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion