ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06946498FLATUpdated Apr 27, 2025

First Local Anaesthesia Thoracoscopy for Pleural Effusion Diagnosis.

An interventional study of Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy and Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies in Suspected Malignant Lung Neoplasm, Pleural Effusion and Pleural Effusion, Malignant, sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.

Primary conditionPleural Effusion, MalignantRegistry: Pleural EffusionReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pleural Effusion — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pleural Effusion, Malignant
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Pleural Effusion, Malignant, a narrower term within Pleural Effusion.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2023, registered Apr 2025).
  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non randomized study with two groups. The study group includes patients with suspected malignant pleural effusion, in whom the investigation of pleural effusion begins directly with pleural biopsy by Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy (LAT).

The Control Group includes patients who come to the same hospital and are treated with the Standard of Care (SOC) strategies were used. Efficacy of LAT, Sensitivity, Hospitalization, time to diagnosis and general safety and comfort of the groups' subjects will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Diagnostic approach of patients with with unexplained lymphocytic exudate is the main subject of the study. Minimally invasive techniques (single entry thoracoscopy with local anesthesia -LAT) have been developed for the definitive biopsy of the parietal pleura, with which, in addition to the diagnosis, a therapeutic pleurodesis can be performed at the same time. Usually, diagnostic LAT is performed only after 3 negative pleural fluid cytological tests have been performed, thus delaying the diagnostic access and treatment of the patient.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the conventional diagnostic approach used in daily clinical practice (3 consecutive punctures of pleural effusion with cytological examination and in case of insufficient diagnosis pleural biopsy, either LAT or VATS depending on the clinical assessment of the patient) with the simplest immediate performance of LAT as soon as a pleural effusion suspected of malignancy is detected. Thus two subject groups will be compared. The first (LAT Group) will undergo Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy as the first line option for the diagnosis of the suspected MPE. The control group will undergo the standard of care recommended guidelines for the diagnosis of MPE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Suspected Malignant Lung Neoplasm
  • Pleural Effusion
  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant

Keywords

  • Malignant Pleural Effusion
  • Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy
  • Medical Thoracoscopy
  • Lung cancer
  • Mesothelioma
  • Lymphocytic Exudate
03

In context

Pleural Effusion, Malignant Reclassified

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 55 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant.

Browse Pleural Effusion, Malignant studies →

Lead sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pleural Effusion, Malignant, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pleural Effusion. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undiagnosed pleural effusion with the character of a lymphocytic exudate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Empyema
  • Transudate pleural effusion.
  • Central airway obstruction by tumor.
  • Existence of extensive adhesions that do not allow the development of iatrogenic pneumothorax and the safe entry of the thoracoscope.
  • Uncontrollable cough.
  • Acute respiratory failure and/or Hypercapnia.
  • Performance Status: 5
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LAT Group

    The study group includes patients in whom the investigation of pleural effusion begins directly with pleural biopsy by Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy (LAT) under conscious sedation. In these patients, imaging with chest CT and/or thoracic ultrasound has been performed and lymphocytic exudate is confirmed in fluid aspiration.

    Procedure: Local Anesthesia Thoracoscopy · Device: Pleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    The Control Group includes patients admitted with undiagnosed pleural lymphocytic exudate, who undergo Standard of Care (SOC) diagnostic strategies according to BTS guideline including among others, 3 samples for cytological examination (40-60 ml each), chest tube drainage, microbiological and immunological studies. If the diagnosis is not established and there is still indication for pleural biopsy patients are referred either for surgical biopsy or LAT.

Interventions

  • ProcedureLocal Anesthesia Thoracoscopy

    The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus, with the affected hemithorax upwards. Ensuring a venous line and full monitoring of vital functions. Mild sedation is given and a dose of Ceftriaxone is given 30 minutes before. Local anesthesia is injected in layers, starting from the skin and working up to the intercostal muscles, intercostal nerve, and periosteum of the rib. Development of pneumothorax is done using a 16-gauge Boutin needle. 15 spontaneous breaths are sufficient to create a pneumothorax, and entry of rigid thoracoscope into the hemithorax through a 11-13 mm Trocar. Multiple biopsies from the parietal pleura are taken and pleurodesis is made according to operator judgment. A chest drain 20-22 G is placed and sutured. A chest X-ray is performed 2-8 hours later after the patient is transferred to the ward. Chest drain is removed after 24h if fluid production is \<250ml and lung re-expansion.

  • DevicePleuroscopy with Rigid Thoracoscope and Forceps biopsies

    A video thoracoscope with an external light source, outer diameter 10 mm (Karl Storz), is inserted into the pleural cavity through a uniportal incision (1 - 1.5 cm) and complete inspection of the pleural cavity is performed. Parietal pleural biopsies are taken with a rigid 40 mm forceps (Karl Storz).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Diagnosis

    Time to diagnosis is defined as the period between the first thoracentesis ,showing a lymphocytic exudate, of a newly discovered pleural effusion in a patient without prior signs of pleural disease to the time of multi-disciplinary team final diagnosis involving a pathology report of biopsy samples.

    Time frame: From enrollment to final diagnosis of MDT, assesed up to 12 months

  2. Hospitalization time

    The time from the patient's admission in the hospital with diagnosis of unexplained lymphocytic pleural effusion until discharge with or without final diagnosis.

    Time frame: From enrollment to hospital discharge, assesed up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient's discomfort/pain

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures the intensity of pain the patient feels after the intervention (Medical Thoracoscopy vs Surgical Biopsy). A horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, (0=No pain, 10=Extreme pain), is used. The patient is examined every day, until his discharge and is asked to mark on the line his respective level of discomfort/pain.

    Time frame: Day 1: immediately post-procedure. Day 2: 24hours post-procedure. Day 3 up to Day of tube removal: Every 24 hours. Time frame ends on removal of chest tube or patient dishcarge, assesment up to 2 weeks

  2. Complications

    We compare the rate of post interventional complications across the two groups (Surgical biopsy vs LAT)

    Time frame: Day 1: immediately post-procedure. Day 2: 24hours post-procedure. Day 3 up to Day of tube removal: Every 24 hours. Time frame ends on removal of chest tube or patient dishcarge, assesment up to 3 months.

  3. Rate of Non Specific Pleuritis

    We aim to asses wheter the rate of positive pleural biopsies for non specific pleuritis differed significantly between Surgical biopsy group and LAT group.

    Time frame: Assesment up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Sotiria General Hospital of Thoracic Diseases
    Athens, Attica 11527, Greece
    Recruiting
    • Nektratios Anagnostopoulos, Ass. Professor · Contactaris.anag@yahoo.gr · +306946869480
    • Michail Kon/nos Tsatsis, MD, MSc, PhD(c) · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ferguson J, Tsim S, Kelly C, Alexander L, Shad S, Neilly M, Tate M, Zahra B, Saleh M, Cowell G, Banks E, Grundy S, Corcoran J, Downer N, Stanton A, Evison M, Rahman NM, Maskell N, Blyth KG. Staging by Thoracoscopy in potentially radically treatable Lung Cancer associated with Minimal Pleural Effusion (STRATIFY): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, observational study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Nov 23;10(1):e001771. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001771. PubMed 37996118 ↗
  • Wan YY, Zhai CC, Lin XS, Yao ZH, Liu QH, Zhu L, Li DZ, Li XL, Wang N, Lin DJ. Safety and complications of medical thoracoscopy in the management of pleural diseases. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0888-5. PubMed 31291926 ↗
  • Shaikh F, Lentz RJ, Feller-Kopman D, Maldonado F. Medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural disease: a guide for the clinician. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020 Oct;14(10):987-1000. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1788940. Epub 2020 Jul 12. PubMed 32588676 ↗
  • Gong L, Huang G, Huang Y, Liu D, Tang X. Medical Thoracoscopy for the Management of Exudative Pleural Effusion: A Retrospective Study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Dec 4;13:2845-2855. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S287758. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33324122 ↗
  • Murthy V, Bessich JL. Medical thoracoscopy and its evolving role in the diagnosis and treatment of pleural disease. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(Suppl 10):S1011-S1021. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.37. PubMed 29214061 ↗
  • Xu LL, Yang Y, Wang Z, Wang XJ, Tong ZH, Shi HZ. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy and long-term prognostic analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0619-3. PubMed 29615010 ↗
  • Li D, Jackson K, Panchal R, Aujayeb A. Local Anaesthetic Thoracoscopy for Pleural Effusion-A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 9;10(10):1978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101978. PubMed 36292425 ↗
  • Arnold DT, De Fonseka D, Perry S, Morley A, Harvey JE, Medford A, Brett M, Maskell NA. Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology. Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5):1801254. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018. Print 2018 Nov. PubMed 30262573 ↗
  • Kiani A, Abedini A, Karimi M, Samadi K, Sheikhy K, Farzanegan B, Pour Abdollah M, Jamaati H, Jabardarjani HR, Masjedi MR. Diagnostic Yield of Medical Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion. Tanaffos. 2015;14(4):227-31. PubMed 27114723 ↗
  • Wu YB, Xu LL, Wang XJ, Wang Z, Zhang J, Tong ZH, Shi HZ. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusion. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Aug 4;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0451-1. PubMed 28778184 ↗
  • Kassirian S, Hinton SN, Cuninghame S, Chaudhary R, Iansavitchene A, Amjadi K, Dhaliwal I, Zeman-Pocrnich C, Mitchell MA. Diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32-40. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959. Epub 2022 Feb 2. PubMed 35110369 ↗
  • Tsim S, Paterson S, Cartwright D, Fong CJ, Alexander L, Kelly C, Holme J, Evison M, Blyth KG. Baseline predictors of negative and incomplete pleural cytology in patients with suspected pleural malignancy - Data supporting 'Direct to LAT' in selected groups. Lung Cancer. 2019 Jul;133:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 16. PubMed 31200818 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is a preliminary study design and for confidentiality rationales in order to protect the novelty of diagnostic strategies implemented in this research .

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 31 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 10, 2025
First posted
Apr 27, 2025
StartActual
May 23, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Apr 27, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06946498
Collaborators
Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens
Responsible party
Stratakos Grigorios (Professor of Interventional Pulmonology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2025
Start date
May 23, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2025

Study contacts

Nektarios ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, Ass. professor
Contact
aris.anag@yahoo.gr
+306946869480
Michail Kon/nos Tsatsis, MD, MSc, PhDc
Contact
tsatsis.mihail@gmail.com
+306979234105
Grigorios Stratakos, Professor
study director · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion