ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07253298BFT in LARSUpdated Nov 10, 2026

The Effects of Kegel Exercise Combined With Biofeedback Therapy on Bowel Function Recovery, Emotional Distress, and Quality of Life in Patients Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

An interventional study of Kegel Exercise with Biofeedback and Kegel Exercise Only in Rectal Cancer, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of combining Kegel exercise with a single biofeedback session on bowel function, emotional distress, and quality of life in patients who have undergone low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a common postoperative complication following LAR, characterized by increased stool frequency, urgency, and incontinence, which can significantly impair patients' psychological well-being and daily quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) Kegel exercise combined with one non-invasive biofeedback session, or (2) Kegel exercise alone. Both groups will perform home-based Kegel exercises for eight weeks. The study aims to determine whether the combined biofeedback and Kegel exercise intervention results in greater improvements in bowel control, emotional well-being, and quality of life compared with Kegel exercise alone.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Patients who undergo low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer often experience low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), characterized by frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. These symptoms can cause considerable psychological distress and impair daily functioning. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT, commonly known as Kegel exercise) is a widely used bowel rehabilitation method; however, its effectiveness depends on patients' ability to perform the exercises correctly. Biofeedback therapy (BFT) provides real-time visual and auditory feedback to help patients better control pelvic floor muscle contractions and relaxations, thereby improving training precision.

Objective:

To examine whether combining a single biofeedback intervention with Kegel exercise produces greater improvements in bowel function, emotional distress, and quality of life than Kegel exercise alone in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods:

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial (IRB No. 202502004RINB) to be conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital. A total of 66 eligible participants who have completed at least four weeks after LAR will be recruited. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into experimental and control groups using block randomization with block sizes of 4, 6, or 8.

The experimental group will receive one 30-minute session of non-invasive electromyographic biofeedback training to correct pelvic floor muscle contraction and relaxation techniques, followed by Kegel exercise instruction. The control group will receive only verbal instruction and demonstration of Kegel exercises without the use of biofeedback devices.

Both groups will continue home-based Kegel exercises for eight weeks, with a total follow-up period of twelve weeks. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks (T3).

Outcome Measures:

Primary outcome: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS Score). Secondary outcomes: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-BREF Taiwan version (WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version).

Expected Results:

The experimental group (Kegel exercise combined with single-session biofeedback) is expected to demonstrate greater improvements in bowel function, reduced emotional distress, and enhanced quality of life compared with the Kegel-only group.

Significance:

This study aims to establish a low-cost, non-invasive, and feasible postoperative rehabilitation approach to enhance bowel recovery and improve the quality of life in patients after rectal cancer surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  • LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Keywords

  • Kegel exercise
  • Biofeedback therapy
  • Bowel dysfunction
  • Emotional distress
  • Quality of life
  • Rectal cancer patients
  • Pelvic floor muscle training
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,615 studies on the registry; 576 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have undergone their first low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer, or LAR with temporary stoma reversal at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Hemodynamically stable with stable vital signs.
  • Conscious, able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese, and capable of following verbal instructions to perform exercises.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a current intestinal stoma.
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker.
  • Scheduled to receive postoperative radiotherapy.
  • History of psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression).
  • Postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal infection, or fistula formation.
  • Unable to cooperate with or complete biofeedback training.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kegel Exercise with Biofeedback Therapy

    Behavioral: Kegel Exercise with Biofeedback

  • Active comparator
    Kegel Exercise Only

    Behavioral: Kegel Exercise Only

Interventions

  • BehavioralKegel Exercise with Biofeedback

    A single 30-minute non-invasive EMG biofeedback session will guide participants to correctly contract and relax pelvic floor muscles using real-time visual and auditory feedback. Conducted by trained healthcare staff in the physical therapy center, with additional outpatient or ward instruction if needed. After the session, participants perform home-based Kegel exercises for 8 weeks (3-5 times/day, 6-8 contractions/set, hold 5-10 sec, relax 10 sec, ≥5 days/week). Research staff will follow up every 1-2 weeks by phone to monitor adherence and adjust intensity. If stable 5-sec contractions are achieved, duration or frequency may increase; if fatigue, abdominal pressure, or discomfort occurs, training will be reduced or paused for safety.

    Also known as: Kegel Exercise with Biofeedback (Kegel + BFT)

  • BehavioralKegel Exercise Only

    Participants in the control group will receive a single 30-minute session of verbal instruction and demonstration on Kegel exercise by trained medical personnel, without the use of any biofeedback device. The provider, setting, duration, exercise dosage, and follow-up schedule are identical to those in the experimental group.

    Also known as: Kegel Exercise

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Bowel Function Measured by the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Score

    Bowel function will be assessed using the validated Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, which consists of five items evaluating incontinence, frequency, clustering, and urgency. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe bowel dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Emotional Distress Measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Emotional distress will be measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which includes 14 items divided into two subscales: anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D). Each subscale has a score range of 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after intervention

  2. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Quality of life will be assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version, a 28-item instrument developed by the WHOQOL Group and culturally adapted for use in Taiwan. The scale measures four major domains-Physical Health, Psychological Health, Social Relationships, and Environment-as well as two national items relevant to local culture. Scores in each domain are transformed to a 4-20 scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 23 months after the start.

Of 329 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 336 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 10, 2026: primary completion Dec 2026 → Dec 2027 and completion Jan 2027 → Dec 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Nov 28, 2025
StartActual
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027was Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027was Jan 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026→Dec 31, 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Study completion
Jan 31, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Primary completion Dec 31, 2026→Dec 31, 2027
    Study completion Jan 31, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07253298
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2025
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion