ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06617884Updated Aug 13, 2025

Home-based Gait and Balance Training in Patients With Movement Disorders

An interventional study of Gait and balance training in Ataxia and Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Forschungszentrum Juelich. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-13.

Sponsored by Forschungszentrum Juelich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Sep 2024).
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The research project is an experimental study with three study visits at the study site at the University Hospital Düsseldorf (UKD) / Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU) and a three-week training phase in a parallel design. Patients with movement disorders (ataxia or Parkinson\'s disease) can take part. The training phase includes individually adapted, targeted, video-based coordination and balance training, which should lead to an improvement in gait and balance. Two different training protocols are carried out in parallel for three weeks each: One with 20 minutes of training per day, four days per week; and one with a training duration of 40 minutes per day, only two days per week. All patients initially take part in a one-week familiarization phase without training and are then randomly assigned to one of the two training protocols or the control group without additional training. In both training phases, the total amount of weekly training time is the same, but the frequency and duration of training sessions per week differs. The patients who were assigned to the control group without additional training can complete the training after their third study visit.

Read the detailed description

It will be investigated separately for the two patient groups (ataxia, Parkinsons disease), whether the video-based training can lead to an improvement in gait and balance and whether the training protocols differ with regard to the desired improvement. The gait and balance variables recorded using the two standard methods (force plate, motion capturing system) will serve as the basis for assessing the training effect. Furthermore, the investigators want to analyze how the individual variables differ between the healthy subjects (from our previous study) and patients with movement disorders.

Patients can also voluntarily record movement data using their own smartphone. This has the advantage that data can also be collected at home, which is more likely to reflect the everyday life of the participants. In particular, the aim is to check whether the data collected with the smartphone can also be read and analyzed in patients, despite the increased movement variability, and whether typical movement patterns and training-related changes can be recorded.

Only adults will take part in the study. The aim is to assess 21 patients with cerebellar ataxia or idiopathic Parkinsons disease per group. This number is based on a power calculation with the software G*Power 3.1.9.7 (Test family t tests, Means: Difference between two independent means (two groups)), with one-sided significance with α = 0.05, 1-β = 0.8 and a calculated effect size of 0.8. Participants in the study will be fully informed in advance about the study procedure. Participation in the study is voluntary. Participants can withdraw from the study at any time without giving reasons and without any disadvantages. A clinical diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia or idiopathic Parkinsons disease is a prerequisite for participation in the study. Participants must also be able to walk independently for 2 minutes. Exclusion criteria are other diseases with an impact on motor skills or serious primary psychiatric illnesses, current drug or alcohol dependency, consumptive illnesses or a poor general condition. There must be no increased risk of falling. Parkinsons patients should carry out the measurements on site and at home during the on-phase of the medication, approx. 2 hours after taking the medication. Patients are recruited via the special outpatient clinic for movement disorders at the Institute for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation at the UKD / HHU Düsseldorf.

The study is discontinued for the individual study participant if an increased risk of falls becomes apparent. The study as a whole will be discontinued if it becomes apparent that the risks of the study outweigh the benefits or if unforeseen complications arise during the training phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ataxia
  • Parkinson Disease

Keywords

  • Training
  • home-based
  • video-based
  • motion capturing
  • movement disorders
  • Ataxia
  • PD
  • Parkinsons Disease
03

In context

Ataxia

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Ataxia; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 30 across 100 interventional studies indexed under Ataxia.

Browse Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Forschungszentrum Juelich as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinical diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia or idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome
  • opportunity to walk a distance of four meters unhindered at home

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other diseases with an impact on motor skills
  • severe primary psychiatric illnesses
  • current drug or alcohol addiction
  • consumptive diseases
  • poor general condition
  • increased risk of falling (anamnestic fall frequency of ≥ 1x per week or as assessed by the attending physician)
  • incapacitated patients in official or court custody or patients unable to give consent
  • for PD patients taking medication: not being able to carry out the measurement in the on-phase of the medication
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4 x 20 minutes training per week

    During the three-week training phase, the video-based training should be carried out at home four times a week for 20 minutes each time. The access to the training videos is provided via links.

    Other: Gait and balance training

  • Experimental
    2 x 40 minutes training per week

    During the three-week training phase, the video-based training should be carried out at home two times a week for 40 minutes each time. The access to the training videos is provided via links.

    Other: Gait and balance training

  • No intervention
    control group

    During the three weeks between study visit two and study visit three, no additional training is conducted. Patients who were assigned to the group without training are given access to the training material after the end of the study and can carry it out afterwards.

Interventions

  • OtherGait and balance training

    The training includes individually adapted, targeted, video-based coordination and balance training, which should lead to an improvement in gait and balance. It includes strength, coordination and flexibility exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. gait velocity

    measured in m/s, measured by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

Secondary outcomes

  1. stride time

    time needed for one stride (two steps) measured in s, measured by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  2. step width

    measured in cm, measured by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  3. cadence

    number of steps per second, measured in s\^-1, measured by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  4. Lat Step Dev

    Lateral Step Deviation / step width variability (SD / CV), measured in cm, measured by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  5. Toe Out Angle

    Foot rotation, measured in degrees, measured by a force plate (zebris) and a motion capturing system (Xsens) at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  6. Double Support Time

    Double Support Time, measured percentage of whole gait cycle, measured by a force plate (zebris) and a motion capturing system (Xsens) at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  7. Toe Off Angle

    Take off angle of foot at \"toe off\" position, measured in degrees, measured by a motion capturing system (Xsens) at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  8. sway area

    Center of mass / center of pressure 95% ellipse area, measured in mm2, measured in all stance tasks by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: rom enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  9. sway velocity

    Center of mass / center of pressure path length per time, measured in mm/s, measured in all stance tasks by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  10. sway path

    Center of mass / center of pressure path in xy-plane, measured in mm, measured in all stance tasks by a force plate (zebris), a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  11. arm-pelvis distance

    Distance from the arms to the pelvis, measured in mm, measured in all stance tasks by a motion capturing system (Xsens) at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  12. foot elevation

    maximum foot elevation during gait, measured in cm, measured in all gait tasks by a motion capturing system (Xsens) at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  13. trunk ROM

    Trunk range of motion in xy-plane, measured in mm, measured by a motion capturing system (Xsens) and individual smartphones of the participants at week 0, at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  14. UPDRS score

    Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Parkinsons Disease. A higher score means a worse outcome. Range: 0-76

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  15. Hoehn and Yahr score

    Hoehn and Yahr scale, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Parkinsons Disease. A higher score means worse outcome. Range: 0-5

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  16. SCAFI score

    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Functional Index, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Ataxia. Separate values are reportet for the 8-meter-walk-test (8MW, in seconds, higher score means worse outcome), 9-hole pegboard test (9HPT, in seconds, higher score means worse outcome) and PATA task (PATA, number of repetitions, higher score means better outcome).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  17. FARS-ADL score

    Activities of daily living, Rating Scale for Friedreichs Ataxia, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Ataxia. A higher score means worse outcome. Range: 0-36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  18. EQ-5D-SL score

    Quality of life questionnaire, assessed via questionnaire at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7). Health status is assessed in % from 0-100, a higher score means better outcome.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  19. TUG time

    time to complete Timed Up and Go test, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7). Measured in seconds, a higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  20. FAHW score

    Fragebogen zum allgemeinen habituellen Wohlbefinden (general habitual well-being questionnaire), assessed via questionnaire at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7). A higher score means better outcome.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  21. ABC-D score

    German version of the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence scale, assessed via questionnaire at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7). Measured in mean %, a higher score means a better outcome. Range: 0-100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  22. MSWS-12

    German Version of Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale, assessed via questionnaire at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7). A higher score means a worse outcome. Range: 12-60.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  23. PDQ-39

    Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire, assessed via questionnaire at baseline (week 1), after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Parkinsons Disease. A higher score means a worse outcome. Range: 0-156.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  24. PGIC

    Patient global impression of change (7-point Likert scale), assessed via questionnaire, after training (week 4) or after training for the control group (week 7). A higher score means a better outcome. Range: -3 to 3 for each item.

    Time frame: At the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

  25. SARA score

    Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, assessed via neurological examination at week 0, after training or no training (week 4) and after training for the control group (week 7), only for the patient group of Ataxia. A higher score means a worse outcome. Range: 0-40.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 4 weeks (training groups) / at 7 weeks (control groups)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Institut für Klinische Neurowissenschaften und Medizinische Psychologie
    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia 40225, Germany
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. PubMed 17695343 ↗
  • Miyai I, Ito M, Hattori N, Mihara M, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Sobue G, Nishizawa M; Cerebellar Ataxia Rehabilitation Trialists Collaboration. Cerebellar ataxia rehabilitation trial in degenerative cerebellar diseases. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):515-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425918. Epub 2011 Dec 2. PubMed 22140200 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Anonymized, aggregated data can be provided upon request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 35 months after the start.

Of 53 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ataxia, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 55 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2024
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
StartActual
Jan 4, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Aug 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06617884
Lead sponsor
Forschungszentrum Juelich
Responsible party
Martina Minnerop, MD (Principal Investigator, Forschungszentrum Juelich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
Jan 4, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2025

Study contacts

Martina Minnerop, PD Dr. med.
Contact
m.minnerop@fz-juelich.de
+49246161-2125
Clara Rentz, M. Sc.
Contact
c.rentz@fz-juelich.de
+492461612125
Martina Minnerop, PD Dr. med.
principal investigator · Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin (INM-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion