ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07202195HANDS-MSUpdated Oct 8, 2026

At Home Use of Stimulation Suits for Managing MS Symptoms

An interventional study of electro-stimulation suit and Usual Care in Multiple Sclerosis, MS (Multiple Sclerosis) and Spasticity With Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Daphne Kos. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Daphne Kos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being carried out at Multiple Sclerosis (MS) centers to evaluate whether a full-body stimulation suit at home can help people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) reduce symptoms like spasticity (muscle stiffness) and ataxia (poor coordination), and improve daily functioning.

Can pwMS who experience spasticity or ataxia benefit from using a stimulation suit for 6 weeks?

Researchers will compare two groups: an intervention group (who will use the suit) and a control group (who will not use the suit).

Participants in the intervention group will:

  • Wear the suit for 6 weeks in total every day or every other day (1 week during their MS center admission and 5 weeks at home).
  • Receive their usual care in addition to wearing the suit.
  • Undergo clinical tests at the MS center after 1 week and 6 weeks of stimulation.

Participants in the control group will:

  • Receive their usual care.
  • Undergo clincial tests at the same time points as the other group.
02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • MS (Multiple Sclerosis)
  • Spasticity With Multiple Sclerosis
  • Ataxia - Other
  • Ataxia, Cerebellar
  • Ataxia, Motor
  • Spasticity
  • Home Based Care

Keywords

  • ataxia
  • spasticity
  • multiple sclerosis
  • MS
  • neuromodulation suit
  • stimulation suit
  • exopluse molli suit
  • home-based rehabilitation
  • symptom management
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Daphne Kos as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible participants must have ataxia or spasticity alongside impairments in upper or lower extremity physical function. MAS score ≥ 1 will be used as an inclusion criterion to determine the presence of spasticity. SARA score ≥ 4 will be used as an inclusion criterion to determine the presence of ataxia. Note: one of the two criteria (MAS score or SARA score) must be fulfilled for a pwMS to be eligible.
  • The patient must have the cognitive abilities to understand instructions and to be able to complete the questionnaires adequately
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted devices (like pacemaker, Baclofen pump, neurostimulator, defibrillator, shunts, equipment, electronic life support, high frequency operation equipment )
  • Change in disease modifying treatment within the last 3 months
  • Use of Botuline Toxine A within the last 3months
  • Recent relapse within the last 3 months
  • Acute musculoskeletal problems that hinder the test performance,
  • Pregnancy
  • Sizes bigger than 3XL (triple eXtra Large)
  • Skin eruptions and/or skin areas in the stimulation zone that are swollen, infected or inflamed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    stimulation suit group

    This group will wear a full-body stimulation suit every day or every other day for six weeks, in addition to their usual care.

    Device: electro-stimulation suit · Other: Usual Care

  • Other
    usual care

    This group will be a comparator and have no added intervention expect for their usual care.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • Deviceelectro-stimulation suit

    In EXOPULSE Mollii Suit is a multi-channel full-body suit with a low energy electrical stimulation - 20 Volt and 20 Hz. It generates 2 milliamp pulses (into 0-10,000 Ohms) with the following parameters: * Pulse width: variable between 25 and 170 μs. * Length of period: 50 ms. * Maximum amplitude: 20 V. It is composed of a control unit, a jacket and pants, with 58 embed-ded electrodes, in direct contact with the skin, and pre-positioned to stimulate 40 key muscle groups. The suit comes in different sizes. A trained medical staff pre-programs which nerves/muscles to be stimulated based on a clinical assessment of the user and the outcome is evaluated through standardized methods. The stimulation program is thus specific to each user.

    Also known as: neuromodulation suit, stimulation suit, EXOPULSE MOLLII suit

  • OtherUsual Care

    The rehabilitation therapy that is being offered at the National MS Center Melsbroek, but somewhat reduced/adjusted to make time for initiation and follow-up of using the neuromodulation suit and potentially also during the weeks at home (i.e., rehabilitation being offered by municipalities).

    Also known as: standard care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NHPT+SSST score

    The primary outcome will be a combined measure of upper and lower extremity motor function, consisting of the Nine Hole Peg Test and the Six Spot step test (labelled NHPT+SSST score). Values are expressed in seconds. A higher score, indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After one and six weeks of stimulation for the intervention group. The control group will be assessed at the same time points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Six spot step test (SSST)

    Similar to the T25FW, the SSST is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. The test contains a rectangular field with six circles on the floor following a criss-cross course. Five circles contain a block. The starting-point is the first circle, which does not contain a block. From there the patient walks to the other side of the field and kicks the blocks out of the five circles, as quickly as possible. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same route. Both the dominant and non-dominant legs are tested twice. The Maximum value: 300.0 seconds A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: SSST assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  2. Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) is an assessment tool used to evaluate movement speed, particularly fine hand motor skills. The patient must take nine pegs from a container as quickly as possible and place them into the holes on a board. Afterwards, the patient must remove the pegs and return them to the container. The time taken to complete the task is measured. The patient may only use the hand being tested and must repeat the procedure for each peg individually (they are not allowed to pick up multiple pegs at once). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: NHPT assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  3. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is designed to objectively assess the degree of spasticity. The MAS measures the level of hypertonia in the left and right elbows and knees. The therapist evaluates the muscle tone and records the highest level of tone felt during five repetitions per joint, using a six-point scale (0 = no increase in muscle tone, 4 = limb rigid in flexion or extension and cannot be moved). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: MAS assessment will take place during screening, as they are used to determine eligibility and after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  4. Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

    SARA is a clinical scale which assesses a range of different impairments in cerebellar ataxia. The scale is made up of 8 items related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin test. The minimum value: 0 The maximum value: 40 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: SARA assessment will take place during screening, as they are used to determine eligibility and after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  5. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The severity of ataxia and spasticity will be documented bij a numeric scale. The minimum value: 0 The maximum value: 10 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: NRS assessments will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  6. 6 Minute walk test

    The goal is for the participant to walk as many meters as possible within 6 minutes over a 30-meter course. The participant may use walking aids or foot orthoses. This test assesses the participant's functional capacity. The more meters walked, the better the functional capacity.

    Time frame: The assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  7. 5 times sit to stand test (5STS)

    De Timed Chair Stand Test is a simple evaluative test used to assess, among other things, muscle strength, balance, and fall risk in older adults. During the Timed Chair Stand Test, the patient is asked to stand up from a chair and sit down again five times as quickly as possible, without using the arms. The physiotherapist records the time in seconds. A score greater than 14s indicates a fall risk.

    Time frame: The assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  8. The patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS)

    A questionnaire on how a person with MS preceives their capacity to walk. The patient needs to chose one descrition the reflects their condition the best. The minimum value: 0 The maximum value: 8 A higher score, indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: PDDS assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  9. The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS12)

    The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is a self-report measure of the impact of MS on the individual's walking ability. The minimum value: 0 The maximum value: 100 A higher score, indicate a worse outcome.

    Time frame: MSWS-12 assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  10. The 36-item Manual Ability Measurement (MAM36)

    The Manual Ability Measure (MAM) is designed as an outcome instrument to assess hand function based on the patient's responses to functional questions. Tasks are rated on a scale from 0 (cannot be done) to 4 (easy to do). Total scores range from 0 to 144. A higher score indicates greater perceived manual ability.

    Time frame: MAM36 assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  11. The EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-D5)

    The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument that provides a score across five health dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. (5 items, three or five response categories) In addition, the patient must indicate how they perceive their overall health status on a scale from 0 to 100. To interpret the results correctly, it is important that the healthcare provider is familiar with the patient's demographic information. (8 items) A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: EQ-5D assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  12. adapted Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 1.4 (TSQM 1.4)

    Is used to evaluate treatment satisfaction with the particular aim of development and evaluation of treatment satisfaction among the patients already undergoing treatment. TSQM (1.4) has 14 questions divided into 4 subscales: effectiveness (items 1 to 3), side effects (items 4 to 8), convenience (items 9 to 11), and global satisfaction (items 12 to 14). Higher scores indicate a higher patient satisfaction with medication (Liberato et al. 2020). The questions have been re-formulated so they are applicable to using the stimulation suit.

    Time frame: The adapted TSQM 1.4 assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation. Only for the intervention group

  13. SymptoMScreen

    A tool for rapid assessment of MS symptom ( the six most common areas where symptomatic complaints occur and are discussed during clinical visits) severity in routine clinical practice. It uses a 7-point Likert scales for each functional domain (0 = not affected at all, 6 = total limitation/I'm unable to do most daily activities). The minimum value: 0 The maximum value: 72 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: SymptoMScreen assessment will take place weekly from the start of the intervention until end of the study.

  14. Modified Fatigue Impact Scales (MFIS)

    The assessment will be used to assess the physical, cognitive, and psychosocial impact of fatigue. Each of the 21 items of the MFIS will be scored from 0-to-4, providing a total score ranging from 0 to 84 (higher scores, greater fatigue impact).

    Time frame: The assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

Other outcomes

  1. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) type

    MS type: primary progressive (PP), secundary progressive (SP), relapsing remitting (RR), ..

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  2. age

    Age (years)

    Time frame: Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  3. sex

    sex (m/v)

    Time frame: Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  4. height

    height (cm)

    Time frame: Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  5. weight

    weight (kg),

    Time frame: Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  6. Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS)

    latest EDSS: The Expanded Disability Status Scale measures your current level of disability. Values: (0.0 -10.0) A higher score indicates a worse outcome

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  7. Time since diagnosis

    time since diagnosis (years)

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  8. Medication

    Previous and current MS medication. previous and current ataxia or spasticity medication will be listed

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  9. Onset Spasticity and/or ataxia

    Time since onset of ataxia or spasticity. (years)

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  10. Comorbidities

    Comorbidities will be listed.

    Time frame: Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weller LJR, Sherwood SM, Ng SH, Vellaichamy M, Noordin AA, Tan LY, Mahadev A, Yeo TH, Ng ZM. Can External Neuromodulation Garments Improve Gait and Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy? A Prospective Single-Arm Study. Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 23;8(3):e70566. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70566. eCollection 2025 Mar. PubMed 40129510 ↗
  • Skjerbaek AG, Dalgas U, Stenager E, Boesen F, Hvid LG. The six spot step test is superior in detecting walking capacity impairments compared to short- and long-distance walk tests in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023 Dec 12;9(4):20552173231218127. doi: 10.1177/20552173231218127. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec. PubMed 38105806 ↗
  • Riemenschneider M, Trenel P, Norgaard M, Boesen F. Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012. Epub 2022 Jul 2. PubMed 35820358 ↗
  • Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087. PubMed 11491192 ↗
  • Perpetuini D, Russo EF, Cardone D, Palmieri R, De Giacomo A, Pellegrino R, Merla A, Calabro RS, Filoni S. Use and Effectiveness of Electrosuit in Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review with Clinical Implications. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;10(6):680. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060680. PubMed 37370612 ↗
  • Palmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z. PubMed 32778118 ↗
  • Moller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbaek AG, Jensen E, Sorensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683479. Epub 2012 May 22. PubMed 22612360 ↗
  • Miller L, Mattison P, Paul L, Wood L. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007 May;13(4):527-33. doi: 10.1177/1352458506071509. Epub 2007 Jan 29. PubMed 17463075 ↗
  • Milinis K, Tennant A, Young CA; TONiC study group. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Associations with impairments and overall quality of life. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Jan;5:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 22. PubMed 26856941 ↗
  • McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. JAMA. 2021 Feb 23;325(8):765-779. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26858. PubMed 33620411 ↗
  • Mai AS, Yong JH, Lim OZH, Tan EK. Non-invasive electrical stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Neurol. 2022 Sep;29(9):2842-2850. doi: 10.1111/ene.15438. Epub 2022 Jun 27. PubMed 35666142 ↗
  • Learmonth YC, Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Pula JH, Cadavid D. Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2013 Apr 25;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37. PubMed 23617555 ↗
  • Jones AA, Purohit R, Bhatt T, Motl RW. Maintaining Mobility and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Examining Potential Impact of Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr;39(4):361-382. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01159-7. Epub 2025 Feb 15. PubMed 39954116 ↗
  • Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, Weinstock-Guttman B. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024 Jan 13;403(10422):183-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PubMed 37949093 ↗
  • Hvid LG, Gaemelke T, Dalgas U, Slipsager MK, Rasmussen PV, Petersen T, Norgaard M, Skjerbaek AG, Boesen F. Personalised inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation elicits clinically relevant improvements in physical function in patients with multiple sclerosis - The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2021 Feb 17;7(1):2055217321989384. doi: 10.1177/2055217321989384. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. PubMed 33643662 ↗
  • Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003 Jan 14;60(1):31-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.60.1.31. PubMed 12525714 ↗
  • Hahn A, Moeller S, Schlausch A, Ekmann M, de Chelle G, Westerlund M, Braatz F, Mayr W. Effects of a full-body electrostimulation garment application in a cohort of subjects with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and stroke on upper motor neuron syndrome symptoms. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2023 Sep 12;69(1):49-59. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2023-0271. Print 2024 Feb 26. PubMed 38354212 ↗
  • Gijbels D, Dalgas U, Romberg A, de Groot V, Bethoux F, Vaney C, Gebara B, Medina CS, Maamagi H, Rasova K, de Noordhout BM, Knuts K, Feys P. Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Mult Scler. 2012 Mar;18(3):364-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458511420598. Epub 2011 Sep 27. PubMed 21952098 ↗
  • Feys P, Lamers I, Francis G, Benedict R, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R; Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):711-720. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690824. Epub 2017 Feb 16. PubMed 28206826 ↗
  • Feys, P., Moghames, P., Kasilingam, E., King, R., Manacorda, T., Fonseca, M., Notas, K., & Kos, D. (2024). Prevalence, severity and impact of MS symptoms, and use of services in Europe: Results from the large scale IMSS survey. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 30(3S), 1160.
  • Cameron MH, Wagner JM. Gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, evaluation, and advances in treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011 Oct;11(5):507-15. doi: 10.1007/s11910-011-0214-y. PubMed 21779953 ↗
  • Callesen J, Richter C, Kristensen C, Sunesen I, Naesby M, Dalgas U, Skjerbaek AG. Test-retest agreement and reliability of the Six Spot Step Test in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019 Feb;25(2):286-294. doi: 10.1177/1352458517745725. Epub 2017 Dec 20. PubMed 29260609 ↗
  • Buckley E, Mazza C, McNeill A. A systematic review of the gait characteristics associated with Cerebellar Ataxia. Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 1. PubMed 29220753 ↗
  • Boesen F, Norgaard M, Trenel P, Rasmussen PV, Petersen T, Lovendahl B, Sorensen J. Longer term effectiveness of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in MS patients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial - The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study. Mult Scler. 2018 Mar;24(3):340-349. doi: 10.1177/1352458517735188. Epub 2017 Oct 6. PubMed 28984159 ↗
  • Bharmal M, Payne K, Atkinson MJ, Desrosiers MP, Morisky DE, Gemmen E. Validation of an abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) among patients on antihypertensive medications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Apr 27;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-36. PubMed 19397800 ↗
  • Amatya B, Khan F, Song K, Galea M. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Spasticity Management in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;48(5):305-343. doi: 10.5535/arm.240064. Epub 2024 Oct 31. PubMed 39497494 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 18 months after the start.

Of 847 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 869 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 25, 2025
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
StartActual
Mar 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Oct 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: date precision
1 update, last Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07202195
Lead sponsor
Daphne Kos
Collaborators
Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev and Ry, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, National MS Center Melsbroek
Responsible party
Daphne Kos (Professor, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Mar 16, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Daphne Kos
Contact
daphne.kos@uzbrussel.be
+32496107849
Alix-Anne Schreinemacher
Contact
alix-anne.schreinemacher@mscenter.be
Daphne Kos
principal investigator · Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion