ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06081855Updated Oct 13, 2023

Predictors of Aortic Root Dilatation in Tetralogy of Fallot Patients

An observational study in Congenital Heart Disease, Aortic Root Dilatation and Tetralogy of Fallot, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-13.

Primary conditionTetralogy of FallotRegistry: Heart Defects, CongenitalReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Heart Defects, Congenital — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Tetralogy of Fallot
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Tetralogy of Fallot, a narrower term within Heart Defects, Congenital.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
77
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  • To predict vulnerable patients for aortic root dilatation in TOF patients using CT as a reliable imaging modality, thus aiding early intervention, and identifying those who will require strict follow-up.
  • To assess the prevalence of TOF patients who developed aortic root dilatation, and those who were complicated with dissection, AR, and aneurysm, through collecting data from a large center (Aswan Heart Centre).
  • To investigate the relationship between age at repair and the diameter of aortic root.
Read the detailed description

Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) occurs in approximately 3 to 5 of every 10,000 live births and is the most common cyanotic congenital heart defect and it exhibits four main features. These features are pulmonary stenosis, right ventricular hypertrophy, overriding aorta and ventricular septal defect. Moreover, since the survival of patients with congenital heart diseases has improved significantly in recent decades, long-term complications should be monitored cautiously. One of these complications is aortic root dilatation, attributed to increased and altered flow through the overriding aorta and an uneven sharing of conotruncal tissue between the aorta and pulmonary artery, particularly in patients who have not undergone early repair.

Despite the concern that TOF patients may harbor aortopathy that can lead to aortic regurgitation, aortic aneurysms, and, potentially, aortic dissection, the scope of the problem remains uncertain. Prevalence estimates of aortic root dilatation have ranged from 15% to 87% with the use of various criteria. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) has also been reported in up to 12.5% of adults with TOF and dilated aortic roots. The incidence of aortic dissection and surgical intervention remains unknown. Moreover, features associated with aortic dilatation are not fully understood. Therefore, correlating and predicting vulnerable patients and identifying possible risk factors for aortic root dilatation in TOF patients, will enable more cautious follow-up and earlier intervention, thus decreasing possible morbidity and mortality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Heart Disease
  • Aortic Root Dilatation
  • Tetralogy of Fallot

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tetralogy of Fallot Reclassified

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Tetralogy of Fallot; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 77 is below the median of 150 across 40 observational studies indexed under Tetralogy of Fallot.

Browse Tetralogy of Fallot studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,081 studies on the registry; 2,179 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Compared within Tetralogy of Fallot, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Heart Defects, Congenital. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Sample size was calculated using Epi- Info7. Based on aortic dilatation is found in 84.6 in follow up CT [12] With a confidence limits 5% and a confidence level of 80% the minimum patients required for this study is 77 cases.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with TOF who either underwent or have not yet had surgical correction.
  • All patients with Fallot-type DORV.
  • Patients should have survived until discharge and have at least one echocardiography and CT with full data related to one or more anatomic subcomponents of the aortic root, either before surgery or during follow-up, regardless of specific duration post repair.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have for conducting cardiac CT scan. For instance, dye sensitivity, pregnancy, CKD, in addition to patients who have factors that interfere with CT image quality as metallic objects within the chest (e.g. Pacemaker).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
77 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Repaired TOF

    Diagnostic Test: CT

  • Unrepaired TOF

    Diagnostic Test: CT

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCT

    Measuring aortic root diameter by CT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aortic root diameters

    : Aortic root diameters at four levels: 1. aortic annulus (AA) 2. sinus of Valsalva (SoV) 3. sinotubular junction (STJ) 4. ascending aorta (AAo). AA will be measured as the inter-commissural distance in the aortic valve, SoV will be measured at the level of maximal diameter on the axial image, STJ will be measured at the level of transitional zone from STJ to AAo, and AAo will be measured at the level of the main pulmonary artery bifurcation. Aortic cross-sectional area will be calculated by π×(diameter/2)2 The largest diameters of each aortic structure as measured based on the chest CT will be re-calculated as z-scores. In our study, "significant dilatation of the aortic structures" is defined as 95% confidence interval (z-score≥2) in diameter of each aortic structures. Echocardiography will be performed to check other cardiac deformities, including AR.

    Time frame: Throughout the study duration, about 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aortic valve repair or surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement

    Time frame: Throughout the study duration, about 1 year

  2. Severity of AR at latest follow-up or before the earliest aortic valve or root intervention.

    Time frame: Throughout the study duration, about 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Expert Consensus Panel:; Miller JR, Stephens EH, Goldstone AB, Glatz AC, Kane L, Van Arsdell GS, Stellin G, Barron DJ, d'Udekem Y, Benson L, Quintessenza J, Ohye RG, Talwar S, Fremes SE, Emani SM, Eghtesady P. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: Management of infants and neonates with tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;165(1):221-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Oct 26. PubMed 36522807 ↗
  • Goldstein BH, Petit CJ, Qureshi AM, McCracken CE, Kelleman MS, Nicholson GT, Law MA, Meadows JJ, Zampi JD, Shahanavaz S, Mascio CE, Chai PJ, Romano JC, Batlivala SP, Maskatia SA, Asztalos IB, Kamsheh AM, Healan SJ, Smith JD, Ligon RA, Pettus JA, Juma S, Raulston JEB, Hock KM, Pajk AL, Eilers LF, Khan HQ, Merritt TC, Canter M, Juergensen S, Rinderknecht FA, Bauser-Heaton H, Glatz AC. Comparison of Management Strategies for Neonates With Symptomatic Tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 2;77(8):1093-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.048. PubMed 33632484 ↗
  • Niwa K, Siu SC, Webb GD, Gatzoulis MA. Progressive aortic root dilatation in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation. 2002 Sep 10;106(11):1374-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028462.88597.ad. PubMed 12221055 ↗
  • Mongeon FP, Gurvitz MZ, Broberg CS, Aboulhosn J, Opotowsky AR, Kay JD, Valente AM, Earing MG, Lui GK, Fernandes SM, Gersony DR, Cook SC, Ting JG, Nickolaus MJ, Landzberg MJ, Khairy P; Alliance for Adult Research in Congenital Cardiology (AARCC). Aortic root dilatation in adults with surgically repaired tetralogy of fallot: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Circulation. 2013 Jan 15;127(2):172-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.129585. Epub 2012 Dec 6. PubMed 23224208 ↗
  • Chong WY, Wong WH, Chiu CS, Cheung YF. Aortic root dilation and aortic elastic properties in children after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 15;97(6):905-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.141. Epub 2006 Feb 3. PubMed 16516599 ↗
  • Niwa K. Aortic root dilatation in tetralogy of Fallot long-term after repair--histology of the aorta in tetralogy of Fallot: evidence of intrinsic aortopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 18;103(2):117-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.07.002. PubMed 16080967 ↗
  • Rathi VK, Doyle M, Williams RB, Yamrozik J, Shannon RP, Biederman RW. Massive aortic aneurysm and dissection in repaired tetralogy of Fallot; diagnosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 11;101(1):169-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.037. No abstract available. PubMed 15860407 ↗
  • Konstantinov IE, Fricke TA, d'Udekem Y, Robertson T. Aortic dissection and rupture in adolescents after tetralogy of Fallot repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;140(5):e71-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.045. Epub 2010 Aug 1. No abstract available. PubMed 20674941 ↗
  • Colan SD, McElhinney DB, Crawford EC, Keane JF, Lock JE. Validation and re-evaluation of a discriminant model predicting anatomic suitability for biventricular repair in neonates with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Apr 17. PubMed 16682313 ↗
  • Gautier M, Detaint D, Fermanian C, Aegerter P, Delorme G, Arnoult F, Milleron O, Raoux F, Stheneur C, Boileau C, Vahanian A, Jondeau G. Nomograms for aortic root diameters in children using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 15;105(6):888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.040. PubMed 20211339 ↗
  • Mohammed AFA, Frick M, Kerst G, Hatam N, Elgamal MF, Essa KM, Hovels-Gurich HH, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Zayat R. Proximal Aortic Dilatation and Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Is There a Relationship? A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 15;10(22):5296. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225296. PubMed 34830578 ↗
  • Kim W, Kwak JG, Cho S, Kim WH. Ten-year follow-up of dilatation of aortic structures in Fallot-type anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Oct;44(7):1552-1559. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03225-7. Epub 2023 Jul 5. PubMed 37405457 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2024; primary completion for Feb 2025, 13 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2023
First posted
Oct 13, 2023
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2025
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 13, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06081855
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Abdelrahman Gamal Ahmed Ramadan (Principle investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2023

Study contacts

Abdelrahman أ Ramadan, MBBCH
Contact
abdelrahman.ramadan@aun.edu.eg
+201011808028
Amr Elbadry, MD
Contact
aelbadry@aun.edu.eg
+201060701601
Amr Elbadry, MD
study chair · Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion