ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05881603GRIEVOUSUpdated Jun 22, 2023

Prevalence of Venous conGestion and Its Association With Renal Injuries Evaluated by the VExUS Score On Admission With UltraSound in Patients With Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

An observational study in Cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 22 studies in Pulmonary Edema with a site in France — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Pulmonary Edema · France.

Started
2023
with 2 others
Observational
8 of 22
2 open now
Registered
17th of 22
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 22
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion

Among the 22 studies in Pulmonary Edema with a site in France, this one is one of 3 that started in 2023, is one of 8 observational ones, and was the 17th registered.

By phase

22 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase10 · 4 open
Observationalthis study8 · 2 open
Phase 33 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2023.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 79 across the 12 interventional studies, 100 across the 8 observational. Of the 10 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 22 studies in Pulmonary Edema with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Acute respiratory distress (ARD) is a frequent reason for seeking care in emergency medicine and represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Among the various etiologies, Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (C APE) currently represents one of the main causes of ARD, particularly in the elderly, with a prevalence of 43% and an estimated mortality of 21%. According to the recommendations issued in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the treatment of cardiogenic APE is currently based on a triptych combining:

  • Oxygen therapy with an Saturation of Hemoglobin with Oxygen (SpO2) target > 94% and the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV),
  • A vasodilator administered intravenously (IV),
  • A loop diuretic by IV route. Although most C APE are today considered to occur in a context of hypervolaemia and are uniformly treated by the administration of diuretics according to the recommendations in force, several works underline the fact that a non-negligible part of these clinical pictures would occur in patients with no water and sodium overload but with "relative" hypervolaemia masking euvolaemia or even hypovolaemia.

At present, no additional examination is recommended to determine the patient's volume status. However, it has been shown more recently that some patients who do not have absolute hypervolaemia could develop acute renal complications during treatment for C APE. In addition, systematic treatment with loop diuretics in patients without absolute hypervolaemia could be harmful by inducing post-treatment hypovolaemia.

At the present time, there are no data from the literature having been interested in the possible association existing between the state of blood volume of the patient on admission and the occurrence of renal complications in the aftermath of the treatment. initial. The prevalence of renal complications was nevertheless evaluated at 9% in this category of patients. The estimated prevalence of this complication and its particular seriousness, particularly in the case of chronic acute kidney injury, as well as its cost to society, justify carrying out a study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of venous congestion in the acute phase and of its possible association with the occurrence of renal complications in the course of this.

Among the various methods for assessing blood volume status, there is a growing literature regarding the use of clinical ultrasound in emergency medicine (ECMU). More recently, an ultrasound score called "VExUS score" (Venous Excess Ultrasound Score) has been developed. This offers the possibility of evaluating and classifying in 4 grades of increasing severity, simply and quickly, the state of venous congestion of patients. This score is based on the presence or absence of venous Doppler ultrasound abnormalities assessed at the level of the inferior vena cava, at the level of the supra-hepatic veins, of the portal and renal venous flow. This score, adapted to the practice of ECMU and making it possible to distinguish patients with or without venous congestion criteria, could provide arguments to guide diuretic treatment by offering personalized care. This evaluation would ultimately make it possible to offer diuretic treatment only in the event of signs suggestive of absolute hypervolaemia and thus avoid the occurrence of complications related to inappropriate therapy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient with cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema defined by the association of clinical acute respiratory distress (current breath rate > 25/min, indrawing, flapping of the wings of the nose, thoraco-abdominal rocking, signs of hypoxemia, signs of hypercapnia) AND signs of pulmonary overload (clinical, biological and radiological arguments).
  • Having given their non-objection to participation in the study (or non-objection of a loved one in an emergency context)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breastfeeding in progress
  • Known to furosemide
  • History of kidney transplantation
  • Known water and electrolyte disorder
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Suspicion of obstruction in the urinary tract
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, minor, person subject to a measure of legal protection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Other" VExUS score " (Venous Excess Ultrasound Score)

    " VExUS score " (Venous Excess Ultrasound Score)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Estimate the prevalence of the different grades of venous congestion assessed by the VExUS score in ultrasound

    VExUS score in ultrasound score 0 to 3 / Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: within 12 hours of admission

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the association between the different ultrasound grades of venous congestion described by the ultrasound VExUS score and the occurrence of renal complications during hospitalization defined by the MAKE-Discharge

    Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE), composite criterion : - Criterion 1 : De novo acute renal failure (ARI) or worsening of pre-existing chronic renal failure (CRI), defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) reference classification

    Time frame: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days

  2. Evaluate the association between the different ultrasound grades of venous congestion described by the ultrasound VExUS score and the occurrence of renal complications during hospitalization defined by the MAKE-Discharge

    Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE), composite criterion : * Criterion 2 : Need for de novo extra-renal purification (ERT) or increased frequency of use of ERT or need for emergency ERT in a patient usually on dialysis, * Occurrence of a death.

    Time frame: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days

  3. Evaluate the association between the different ultrasound grades of venous congestion described by the ultrasound VExUS score and the occurrence of renal complications during hospitalization defined by the MAKE-Discharge

    Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE), composite criterion : * Criterion 3 : Occurence of death * Occurrence of a death.

    Time frame: 7 days, 30 days, 180 days

  4. Assess the association between the grade of the VExUS ultrasound score on admission and the total and daily dose of furosemide administered to the patient

    dose of furosemide

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Evaluate the kinetics of evolution of the VExUS ultrasound score performed at the patient's bedside in comparison with the values found on admission

    VExUS score in ultrasound score 0 to 3 / Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: within 12 hours of admission , day 3 day 7

  6. Evaluate the association between the presence of venous congestion (VExUS score ≥ 1) or not and vital and functional status : Gerontological autonomy iso-resource groups

    Gerontological autonomy iso-resource groups (score AGGIR) Value 1 to 6 / Higher score mean better outcome

    Time frame: day 7, day 30, day 180

  7. Evaluate the association between the presence of venous congestion (VExUS score ≥ 1) or not and vital and functional status : Activities of daily living

    Activities of daily living (score ADL) Value 1 to 6 / Higher score mean better outcome

    Time frame: day 7, day 30, day 180

  8. Evaluate the association between the presence of venous congestion (VExUS score ≥ 1) or not and vital and functional status : Barthel Index

    Barthel Index Value 0 to 100 / Higher score mean better outcome

    Time frame: day 7, day 30, day 180

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 24 months after the start.

Of 27 observational studies under Pulmonary Edema, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2023
First posted
May 31, 2023
StartActual
May 20, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 2025
Last update
Jun 22, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05881603
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2023
Start date
May 20, 2023
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Study contacts

Lucie AUZANNEAU
Contact
lucie.auzanneau@chu-reunion.fr
0262359949 ext. +262

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion