ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05227222Updated Oct 5, 2026

PEP-device for Treatment of Swimming-induced Pulmonary Edema (SIPE)

An interventional study of PEP-device in Swimming Induced Pulmonary Edema (SIPE), Pulmonary Edema and Lung Diseases, sponsored by Dalarna County Council, Sweden. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Dalarna County Council, Sweden · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE), there is a lack of knowledge regarding optimal treatment. The present study was designed to assess the benefit of treatment with positive expiratory pressure device (PEP-device) compared to spontaneous recovery in patients with SIPE without hypoxia in the out-of-hospital environment.

Read the detailed description

Swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) is an unusual condition affecting otherwise healthy swimmers. SIPE is characterized by acute onset of dyspnea and cough, excessive sputum and occasionally hemoptysis when swimming in open water. The condition usually resolves spontaneously within 48 hours, but may result in serious illness and require emergency care. Case reports describe acute treatment with or without oxygen in combination with diuretics, beta-agonist-inhalation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Evidence for optimal treatment strategy is lacking. Oxygen treatment might not be appropriate for patients with SIPE presenting without hypoxia. It is unknown if positive airway pressure accelerates recovery in SIPE.

This study intends to determine whether treatment with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) applied by PEP-device accelerates increase of oxygen saturation compared to spontaneous recovery in patients presenting with SIPE without hypoxia. The aim is to treat patients on site without involving hospital care. We study a large cohort of approximately 12 000 swimmers during Vansbrosimningen, Sweden's biggest annual open water event with a yearly incidence of SIPE about 0,4%.

Adult patients clinically diagnosed with SIPE and oxygen saturation ≥92% are randomly assigned to 2 groups: (1) PEP-device for 20 minutes or (2) control group with spontaneous recovery without active treatment for 20 minutes. Assessment with outcome measures is taken 10 minutes after intervention/control. Primary endpoint: oxygen saturation (%) by pulse oxymetry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Swimming Induced Pulmonary Edema (SIPE)
  • Pulmonary Edema
  • Lung Diseases

Keywords

  • positive expiratory pressure
  • therapeutics
  • ultrasonography
  • oximetry
03

In context

Pulmonary Edema

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Edema; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 65 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Edema.

Browse Pulmonary Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Dalarna County Council, Sweden is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinical diagnosis of swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) with need of acute treatment
  • peripheral oxygen saturation ≥92%
  • 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • declined consent
  • suspected acute coronary syndrome
  • severe asthma diagnosed together with pulmonary edema with requirement of beta-agonist-inhalation prior to treatment of pulmonary edema
  • hemodynamic instability or decreased consciousness
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEP-device

    Positive expiratory pressure device: continuous treatment with PEP-device breathing air for 20 minutes followed by 10 minutes rest and assessment. Inspiration through nose/mouth, expiration through device.

    Device: PEP-device

  • No intervention
    spontaneous recovery

    Control group: Resting and breathing air for 20 + 10 minutes.

Interventions

  • DevicePEP-device

    PEP-device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute peripheral oxygen saturation (%) after treatment

    Peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by peripheral pulse oximetry

    Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in absolute peripheral oxygen saturation (%) before and after treatment

    Change in peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by pulse oximetry before and after treatment

    Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  2. Recovery (yes/no) after treatment

    Recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation \>95% after treatment" or no recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation ≤95% after treatment"

    Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  3. Interstitial syndrome assessed by lung ultrasound (yes/no) after treatment

    Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Bilateral or unilateral presence of two or more positive regions define positive interstitial syndrome

    Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  4. Absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound after treatment

    Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions.

    Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  5. Change in absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound before and after treatment

    Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions. Change in absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound before and after treatment

    Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  6. Change in patient reported outcome measures before and after treatment

    Six different patient reported outcome measures assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS; min-max 0-10): cough, sputum, air hunger, breathing effort, tightness in chest, anxiousness. The patients will assess symptoms prior to and after treatment

    Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest

  7. Admission to hospital (yes/no)

    Admission to hospital within or after a maximal treatment time of 1 hour

    Time frame: 1 hour

  8. Total treatment time

    Total treatment time until oxygen saturation ≥96% is reached

    Time frame: 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 60 months after the start.

Of 22 interventional studies with no phase under Pulmonary Edema, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 69. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 26, 2022
First posted
Feb 7, 2022
StartActual
Jul 2, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jul 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 15, 2027
Last update
Oct 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date, oversight details and index terms
1 update, last Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 3 other changes: verification date, oversight details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05227222
Lead sponsor
Dalarna County Council, Sweden
Responsible party
Maria Hårdstedt (Dr. Maria Hårdstedt, PhD, Specialist Internal Medicine, Dalarna County Council, Sweden) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2022
Start date
Jul 2, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Maria Hårdstedt, MD/PhD
Contact
maria.hardstedt@regiondalarna.se
46-738089464

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion