An interventional study of Clinician Nudge and Patient Nudge in HIV, Smoking and Tobacco Use, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.
Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Among 13 studies in Smoking by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Smoking · Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine.
Among the 13 studies in Smoking by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine, this one is the 4th largest by planned enrollment of the 12 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2023, is one of 11 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.
1,509 studies on the registry are indexed under Smoking; 193 are open to participants now.
Browse Smoking studies →2 of the 13 studies in Smoking by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Sites in United States
Ages 21+ · Healthy volunteers
By country, each count listing its studies:
Of the 140 Smoking studies recruiting now, 74 (53%) set no upper age limit and 48 (34%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 65 take healthy volunteers.
This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
13 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2011; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2023.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 115 across 1,164 interventional studies indexed under Smoking.
Median enrollment 215 across the 12 interventional studies, 62 across the 1 observational. Of the 10 that completed or were terminated, 6 (60%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine is the lead sponsor of 460 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.
Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (42%) have results posted.
2 of the studies in Smoking by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05852860Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineA Patient-Oriented Research Mentoring Program in Tobacco Dependence and Implementation Science Research | 2027-02-01 |
| NCT06264154Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineThe Role of Flavor in the Substitutability of E-cigarettes for Combustible Cigarettes Among Persistent Smokers | 2027-06 |
Among the 13 studies in Smoking by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of "nudges" to clinicians, patients, or both in increasing referral to, and engagement with, tobacco use treatment services (TUTS) for HIV patients versus usual care. This will be a four-arm pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. The investigators hypothesize that each of the implementation strategy arms will significantly increase TUTS referral and engagement compared to usual care and that the combination of nudges to clinicians and to patients will be the most effective.
Treatments for tobacco use, including behavioral counseling and FDA-approved medications, increase the likelihood that smokers interested in quitting will make and succeed in a quit attempt. These medications are safe, including among smokers with psychiatric and medical comorbidities, including cancer, HIV, and cardiovascular disease. Yet, the majority of smokers who try to quit do not use FDA-approved medications or guideline-based counseling in their attempt. Data from Medicaid, Medicare, outpatient medical settings, and primary care show that, at best, only 25% of those interested in quitting use evidence-based tobacco treatments in their attempt. This reality may be worse for populations that traditionally show higher smoking rates and lower access to treatments; 40-75% of people with HIV (PWH) are current smokers, which is >2 times the general population rate. PWH also show very low rates of tobacco treatment utilization, including clinician-based treatments such as the 5As, NRT, and web-based treatments, and varenicline use among PWH is \~4%. The widespread use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for PWH has substantially improved life expectancy but PWH now lose more life-years to tobacco use than to their HIV infection, primarily from cancer and cardiovascular disease, which account for almost one-quarter of all deaths among PWH.
The investigators have shown that clinician willingness to treat patient smoking is related to clinician bias, including their perceived role in treating tobacco, patient culpability, and effectiveness. In 2 studies, the investigators showed that didactic instruction to counter these biases significantly increased clinician willingness to treat patient tobacco use. In a single-arm study, the researchers showed that a message delivered to oncologists through the EMR that addressed omission bias about tobacco treatment improved actual tobacco treatment rates for cancer patients from 0% to 36%. The study team recently completed a pragmatic RCT testing EMR-delivered patient and clinician nudges directed at omission and status quo biases to promote tobacco treatment in oncology (P50 CA244690). With 2,146 cancer patients accrued, a generalized estimating equation in an ITT analysis showed that the clinician nudge led to about a 3-fold increase in tobacco treatment engagement vs. usual care (35.6% vs. 13.5%; OR = 3.36, 95% CI: 2.12-5.32, p \< 0.001). Advanced Practice Practitioners were significantly more likely than physicians to provide tobacco treatment and non-white patients were significantly more likely than white patients to engage in tobacco treatment (p's \< 0.001). These findings were presented at the 15th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health and a manuscript is in preparation.
While these data show a >3-fold increase in tobacco treatment rates from the clinician nudge (vs. usual care), the patient nudge did not increase tobacco treatment rates. Notably, however, the investigators in this study did not conduct a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to identify the patient bias to target with the patient nudge and the team relied on the EMR for patient nudge delivery (\~25% of patients are not registered users of the patient portal). Conducting a DCE to identify the bias target and expanding patient nudge delivery to include text messages may affect the impact of the patient nudge in the proposed study.
This study is particularly important because it will generate: 1) implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics and directed at clinicians and patients to increase tobacco use treatment for PWH; 2) optimal EHR-based infrastructure to facilitate tobacco use treatment; and 3) knowledge about which strategies are effective that can be tested more widely. New approaches to increasing tobacco treatment for PWH could lead to benefits at the patient and population levels. Insights from this study could be applied in other clinical settings to increase tobacco treatment, and thus improve patient outcomes in other populations.
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinician participants must meet the following criteria for enrollment:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinicians and patients will receive no further interventions beyond usual practice.
Clinicians will receive a nudge via a Best Practice Alert within the electronic medical record.
Other: Clinician Nudge
Patients will receive a message sent through the patient portal or via text.
Other: Patient Nudge
Both the clinician nudge and the patient nudge will be used.
Other: Clinician Nudge · Other: Patient Nudge
The clinician nudge will use the BPA functionality within the electronic medical record to deliver a message with a defaulted option to refer to the health system's tobacco treatment program. Changing the default to "no referral" will require an explanation using the options provided or by entering free text.
The patient nudge will deliver a message within 72 hours of a patient's next scheduled clinic visit. The message will be delivered through the Penn patient portal (MyPennMedicine) or by text with security measures for privacy.
Rate of referral to tobacco treatment
Defined as the number of TUTS orders signed in the electronic medical record, divided by the total number of pended orders
Time frame: through study completion, up to one year
Rate of engagement in tobacco treatment
Defined as the total number of patients who enroll in a tobacco treatment trial, complete at least one session with a tobacco treatment specialist from the investigators' cessation program, or use a tobacco medication divided by the total number of patients
Time frame: through study completion, up to one year
Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 38 months after the start.
Of 401 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Smoking, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 38 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 456 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 40.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine →