ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06125743Updated Nov 10, 2026

Self-Management for Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis [PROMISE Trial]

An interventional study of Usual Care and In-Person LEF-SMP in Lymphedema of the Head and Neck, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Updated Nov 10, 20261 site added1 site removedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
204
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized lymphedema and fibrosis self-management program (LEF-SMP) to improve LEF self-management and reduce LEF-associated symptom burden, functional deficits, and improve quality of life in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.

Read the detailed description

In HNC survivors with lymphedema and fibrosis (LEF), the investigators will: 1) compare the effects of in-person LEF-SMP, telehealth LEF-SMP, and usual care on LEF severity; 2) compare the effects of in-person LEF-SMP, telehealth LEF-SMP, and usual care on LEF-related symptom burden, functional impairments, and quality of life; and 3) compare the effects of in-person LEF-SMP, telehealth LEF-SMP, and usual care on LEF-related knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, and self-care adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphedema of the Head and Neck

Keywords

  • Lymphedema
  • Fibrosis
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Survivorship
  • Self-Management
03

In context

Lymphedema

529 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 204 is above the median of 50 across 369 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.

Browse Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine is the lead sponsor of 460 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • >18 years of age
  • Post HNC primary treatment
  • No evidence of cancer (NED)
  • Completion of initial lymphedema therapy for head and neck lymphedema
  • Unable to obtain lymphedema therapy due to barriers noted above
  • History of lymphedema on the face and neck, with or without fibrosis
  • Ability to understand English in order to complete questionnaires
  • Ability to perform self-care activities for LEF management
  • Ability to provide
  • Having an electronic device (a computer, tablet, iPad, or smartphone) and internet access at home
  • A valid email address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent or cancer
  • Any other active cancer
  • Acute infection
  • Acute congestive heart failure
  • Acute renal failure
  • Cardiac or pulmonary edema
  • Sensitive carotid sinus
  • Severe carotid blockage
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Venous thrombosis
  • Pregnant people
  • Incarcerated patients
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
204 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Usual Care

    Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Experimental
    In-Person LEF-SMP

    Behavioral: In-Person LEF-SMP

  • Experimental
    Telehealth LEF-SMP

    Behavioral: Telehealth LEF-SMP

Interventions

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Participants will conduct self-care activities prescribed by their treating lymphedema therapists.

  • BehavioralIn-Person LEF-SMP

    Participants will receive the in-person LEF-SMP intervention.

  • BehavioralTelehealth LEF-SMP

    Participants will receive the telehealth LEF-SMP intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in severity of lymphedema and fibrosis

    This outcome measure will be assessed via Head and Neck - External Lymphedema and Fibrosis Assessment Criteria (HN-LEF Assessment Criteria). The total severity score of lymphedema and fibrosis (LEF) is calculated by summing the severity score (normal = 0, mild =1, moderate =2, and severe =3) of each anatomical site affected by head and neck LEF. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in severity of symptom burden

    This outcome measure will be assessed via Head and Neck - Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory (HN-LEF Symptom Inventory). The severity score of symptom burden is dependent on the number of self-reported symptoms \[overall score range: 0 (no) - 5 (severe)\], and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  2. Changes in degrees of jaw range of motion

    This outcome measure will be assessed via Jaw Range of Motion Scale. Higher degrees of jaw range of motion mean a better outcome (criteria for trismus: mouth opening \< 35mm).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  3. Changes in degrees of cervical range of motion

    This outcome measure will be assessed via Cervical Range of Motion Instrument. Higher degrees of cervical range of motion mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  4. Changes in quality-of-life score

    This outcome measure will be assessed via European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This questionnaire includes a global health-related quality of life scale, 5 functional subscales, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single items. Scores for all scales and single items are linearly converted to range from 0-100, and higher scores signify a higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  5. Changes in LEF-related knowledge score

    LEF-related knowledge will be assessed via HN-LEF Knowledge Test scale. The scale asks participants to answer 35 true/false questions. The total score (score range: 0-35) represents participants' knowledge level related to head and neck LEF, and higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  6. Changes in LEF-related skills

    LEF-related skills will be assessed via HN-LEF Skill Checklist. Study lymphedema therapists use this checklist to evaluate participants' LEF self-care skills.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  7. LEF-related self-efficacy score

    LEF-related self-efficacy will be assessed via Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale \[8-item, each item score 1 (strongly disagree) - 5 (strongly agree)\]. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

  8. LEF-related self-care adherence status

    LEF-related self-care adherence will be assessed via LEF Self-Care Checklist. Higher scores indicate greater better adherence to LEF self-care activities (i.e., full adherence: ≥ 5 days; partial adherence: 3-4 days; non-adherence: \<3 days).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deng J, Abene J, Huang L, Murphy BA. Study protocol for a multi-site randomized clinical trial of an intervention program to promote self-management among head and neck cancer survivors with lymphedema and fibrosis [PROMISE trial]. Trials. 2025 Oct 13;26(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09089-x. PubMed 41084063 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 41 months after the start.

Of 175 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lymphedema, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 197 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2023
First posted
Nov 9, 2023
StartActual
Mar 29, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Nashville, United States
Show 1 removed
  • Barbara Murphy · Nashville, United States
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Nashville, United States
    Show 1 removed
    • Barbara Murphy · Nashville, United States
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06125743
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2023
Start date
Mar 29, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jie Deng, PhD
Contact
jiedeng@nursing.upenn.edu
2155732393

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion