CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05826626MindLensesNUpdated Oct 15, 2024

Investigating Neurocognitive, Motor and Biological Effects of MindLenses Professional in Neurological Diseases

An interventional study of MindLenses Professional and Conventional rehabilitation in Stroke and Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2021, registered Mar 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to explore the effects of the treatment with MindLenses Professional device on cognitive and motor performances,as well as on the levels of a neurotrophic factor implied in brain plasticity, that is the brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), in neurological patients. A further aim of the study is to evaluate if the treatment's efficacy could depend on specific characteristics of brain alteration (lesion vs atrophy). The treatment combines prismatic adaptation with serious games for cognitive training, for a total of 10 sessions. 30 patients with stroke and 30 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment will be enrolled.

Read the detailed description

Prismatic lenses refers to a device that allow a controlled deviation of the visual field. Prismatic lenses are commonly used in the treatment of stroke patients with neglect symptoms. Neglect is a neuropsychological disorder characterised by an asymmetric processing of bodily and sensory information in which patients fail to attend to stimuli in the contralesional space. Prismatic lenses are considered as a bottom-up approach in the rehabilitation of neglect, inducing a temporary automatic shift of the attention towards the neglected space. While wearing goggles with prismatic lenses, patients are asked to perform a pointing task requiring the reorganization of visuo-motor coordinates to point to the target correctly. During the initial phase of the pointing task, patients typically misreach the target in the direction of the visual displacement (direct effect). After a few trials, normal accuracy is restored. After removing the prisms, subjects typically misreach the target in the direction opposite to that of the original deviation. This phenomenon is known as after effect (AE). The whole process of sensori-motor adaptation is called prism adaptation (PA). Some studies estimates that a single session of PA can mitigate neglect symptoms for almost 1 hour, and a treatment with PA for 2 weeks can ameliorate symptoms for 6 months. Recently, prismatic lenses have been used also in the healthy population as a tool to induce non-invasive neuromodulation of brain networks. Indeed, PA is thought to increase cortical excitability of frontal and parietal regions ipsilateral to the induced deviation. PA effects been studied using electrophysiological and neuroanatomical techniques. In the first case, Bracco and colleagues (2018) found a modulation of EEG activity implied in motor preparation during PA. In the second case, Wilf and colleagues (2019) observed a more efficient switch between default mode network and attentive network following PA. Moreover, a recent study reported that PA could affect also motor outcomes, such as plantar pressure and handgrip strength.

Recently, Restorative Neurotechnologies S.r.l. created Mindlenses Professional, a new digital tool that combines PA with serious games for cognitive rehabilitation. Both PA and seirous games are performed using a tablet. Concerning PA administration, black squares are presented in the centre, on the left or on the right of the screen. Patients are required to touch the black square with rapid and precise movements. Mindlenses combines the neuromodulatory potential of PA to increase the rehabilitative outcomes of the digital exercises. Preliminary results showed that the combination of these two techniques can ameliorate attention and executive function.

Mindlenses professional includes 12 assessment tasks and 7 rehabilitation exercises, which encompass 6 cognitive domain: attention, visual search, memory, learning, working memory and language. The 12 assessment tasks do not replace a full neurpsyhcological evaluation, but can be informative on the patient's cognitive functioning and allow the clinician to identify patient's difficulties. From the perfoemances at these tasks, the clinician can schedule a rehabilitation program tailored on the patient's need. The treatment consists in 10 sessions in which the patient performs both PA and serious games.

The aim of this project is to validate Mindlenses Professional in patients with stroke or with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Mindlenses efficacy will be evaluated in terms of changes in cognitive and motor performance before and after the treatment, compared to a treatment using only serious games and to conventional cognitive rehabilitation. Moreover, patients' neuroimaging data will be acquired to explore whether vascular lesions or atrophy in specific brain regions could affect the PA performance and the efficacy of the treatment. Lastly, changes in brain plasticity, assessed as plasma levels of the brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), before and after the treatment will be investigated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • prism adaptation
  • cognitive training
  • neurological patients
  • neuropsychology
03

In context

Nervous System Diseases

974 studies on the registry are indexed under Nervous System Diseases; 252 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 48 across 623 interventional studies indexed under Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of: Mild Cognitive Impairment, and stroke
  • preserved use of at least one hand,
  • normal or corrected to normal vision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of psychiatric and/or concurrent neurological diseases
  • inability to provide informed consent,
  • impaired comprehension of oral instructions,
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    The group will undergo 10 sessions (2 weeks) of a treatment combining prismatic adaptation (PA) and serious games (SG) for cognitive training, using the Mindlenses Professional device. In each session, the PA procedure will be performed, followed by approximately 30 minutes of SG. SG will be focused on attention, executive functions and language.

    Device: MindLenses Professional

  • Active comparator
    Control Group -1

    The group will undergo 10 sessions (2 weeks) of a treatment using the serious games (SG) for cognitive training provided by the Mindlenses Professional device. SG will be focused on attention, executive functions and language.

    Device: MindLenses Professional

  • Active comparator
    Control Group -2

    The group will perform 2 weeks of the standard cognitive training offered by IRCCS San Camillo Hospital.

    Behavioral: Conventional rehabilitation

Interventions

  • DeviceMindLenses Professional

    MindLenses professional's device combines the prismatic adaptation (PA) procedure with the administration of serious games (SG) for cognitive training using a tablet

  • BehavioralConventional rehabilitation

    Conventional rehabilition consists in computerized exercises focused on the main cognitive domains

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure of changes in cognitive and motor function after a treatment with Mindlenses professional

    Cognitive performances will be assessed by a full neuropsychological battery encompassing the main cognitive domain, such as memory, attention, executive function, language, visuospatial abilities. Specific neuropsychological tests will be defined on the basis of the specific neurological population. Motor function will be assessed using functional scales such as FIM and FAM. Raw scores at each test and scale will be converted in z-scores based on each test/scale normative data. Z-scores will be averaged to calculate composite scores specific for each cognitive domain and for motor functioning. In detail, the composite scores will be the following: general cognitive functioning, attention, executive function, short-term memory, long-term memory, visuospatial abilities, language, motor functioning.

    Time frame: At baseline and after 2 weeks (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuroimaging correlates of PA

    Structural (e.g., lesion mapping and/or voxel based morphometry) will be extracted by neuroimaging data acquired before and after treatment. Neuroimaging measures will be correlated with PA performances. PA will be performed using a tablet which automatically records poiniting displacement.

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Changes in brain plasticity after a treatment with Mindlenses professional

    Brain plasticity will be assessed using the concentration of brain-derived neutrophic factor in plasma level. Patients' blood samples will be collected and will then be analysed using the ELISA kit for BDNF.

    Time frame: At baseline and after 2 weeks (post-intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital
    Lido Di Venezia, Venezia 30126, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bonaventura RE, Giustino V, Chiaramonte G, Giustiniani A, Smirni D, Battaglia G, Messina G, Oliveri M. Investigating prismatic adaptation effects in handgrip strength and in plantar pressure in healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.022. Epub 2019 Dec 23. PubMed 31881480 ↗
  • Bracco M, Mangano GR, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Oliveri M. Combining tDCS with prismatic adaptation for non-invasive neuromodulation of the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 1;101:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 6. PubMed 28487249 ↗
  • Bracco M, Veniero D, Oliveri M, Thut G. Prismatic Adaptation Modulates Oscillatory EEG Correlates of Motor Preparation but Not Visual Attention in Healthy Participants. J Neurosci. 2018 Jan 31;38(5):1189-1201. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1422-17.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 18. PubMed 29255004 ↗
  • Cubelli R. Definition: Spatial neglect. Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:320-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 7. No abstract available. PubMed 28454716 ↗
  • Farne A, Rossetti Y, Toniolo S, Ladavas E. Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):718-29. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00186-5. PubMed 11900724 ↗
  • Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, Avanzi S, Ladavas E. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf056. PubMed 11872617 ↗
  • Gammeri R, Iacono C, Ricci R, Salatino A. Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jan 10;16:131-152. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S171461. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32021206 ↗
  • Magnani B, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M. Prismatic adaptation as a novel tool to directionally modulate motor cortex excitability: evidence from paired-pulse TMS. Brain Stimul. 2014 Jul-Aug;7(4):573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13. PubMed 24934876 ↗
  • Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D. Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(11):1250-4. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00064-1. PubMed 11527562 ↗
  • Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):166-9. doi: 10.1038/25988. PubMed 9744273 ↗
  • Serino A, Bonifazi S, Pierfederici L, Ladavas E. Neglect treatment by prism adaptation: what recovers and for how long. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007 Dec;17(6):657-87. doi: 10.1080/09602010601052006. PubMed 17852762 ↗
  • Wilf M, Serino A, Clarke S, Crottaz-Herbette S. Prism adaptation enhances decoupling between the default mode network and the attentional networks. Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.050. Epub 2019 Jun 22. PubMed 31233909 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05826626
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
Collaborators
Restorative Neurotechnologies S.r.l.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2023
Start date
Oct 5, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
Sep 30, 2024
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Francesca Burgio, PhD
principal investigator · IRCCS San Camillo Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion