ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04445649Updated Oct 1, 2026

Prognostic Factors to Regain Consciousness

An observational study in Neurologic Disorder, Disorder of Consciousness and Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2020; still recruiting 6 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to identify factors that predict the medium and long-term outcome of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) undergoing early neurological rehabilitation.

In this prospective, observational study, 130 DOC patients are going to be included (36 months). At study entry, different routine data, disease severity and functional status are documented for each patient. In addition, MRI, EEG and evoked potentials are measured within the first week. The level of consciousness is recorded with the Coma-Recovery-Scale-Revised and serves as the primary outcome parameter. Complications, comorbidities, functional status and leve of consciousness are assessed weekly. After eight weeks, the measurement of the MRI, the EEG and the evoked potentials are repeated. After 3, 6 and 12 months, the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Revised is used to followed up the current status of the patients.

Read the detailed description

Due to continuous improvements in acute medical care, the number of patients surviving severe brain damage has increased over the past decades. While some patients improve significantly during the first days after the injury, other patients remain in altered states of consciousness (i.e. coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state). Acquired brain damage such as cerebrovascular diseases, traumatic brain injuries or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathies are the main causes of severe impaired consciousness.The correct classification of the level of consciousness is of great importance, since the different states of consciousness are associated with different prognoses and treatment options. Patients who show minimal signs of consciousness (MCS) a month after the onset of the disease have better chances of regaining consciousness within one year than UWS patients. Within both categories (UWS, MCS), traumatic aetiologies in turn have a better prognosis than non-traumatic aetiologies. The prognosis usually begins with the admission of the patients to the intensive care unit of the acute care facility. But even in later treatment phases, a large number of patients regain consciousness, e.g. during post-acute early rehabilitation and even years after the disease. Numerous factors are associated with the prognosis (e.g. age, aetiology, duration of illness, functional status and state of consciousness). Although there are numerous studies on the prognostic factors and outcome of patients with severe brain damage, only a few have explicitly examined patients with initially severe and long-lasting impaired consciousness. The study therefore aims to identify factors that predict the medium and long-term outcome of patients with severe impaired consciousness in early neurological rehabilitation.

Over a period of 36 months, 130 patients undergoing neurological early rehabilitation with impaired consciousness are included. It is a prospective observational study that is carried out in a single neurological rehabilitation centre (monocentric). Different routine data, disease severity and functional status are documented for each patient. In addition, MRI, EEG and evoked potentials are measured within the first week. The level of consciousness is recorded with the Coma-Recovery-Scale-Revised and serves as the primary outcome parameter. Complications, comorbidities, functional status and leve of consciousness are assessed weekly. After eight weeks, the measurement of the MRI, the EEG and the evoked potentials are repeated. After 3, 6 and 12 months, the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Revised is used to follow up the current status of the patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurologic Disorder
  • Disorder of Consciousness
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Stroke
  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Keywords

  • Neurological rehabilitation
  • Prognosis
  • Outcome
  • Level of consciousness
03

In context

Nervous System Diseases

757 studies on the registry are indexed under Nervous System Diseases; 218 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is below the median of 150 across 228 observational studies indexed under Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing neurological early rehabilitation with impaired consciousness and admitted to intensive care unit

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • early neurological rehabilitation (phase B)
  • stroke, traumatic brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
  • disorder of consciousness (coma, UWS, MCS)
  • at minimum two weeks after disease onset
  • admission to intensive care unit
  • written consent from the patient's legal representative
  • exclusion of pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient cardiorespiratory stability
  • fractures or severe infratentorial brain injuries leading to impaired auditory evoked - potentials
  • previous brain damage
  • mental disorders (dementia, depression)
  • colonization with multi-resistant pathogens
  • MRI
  • claustrophobia
  • weight > 120 kg
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ICU patients

    Patients with impaired consciousness admitted to intensive care unit after severe brain injury

    Diagnostic Test: Coma-Recovery-Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testComa-Recovery-Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

    CRS-R assessments (15 minutes) are repeated weekly after study entry

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changed functional status

    Functional status is measured with Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI; Range: -325 to 100; higher scores mean a better outcome) weekly.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changed level of consciousness

    Level of consciousness is measured with the Coma-Recovery-Scale-Revised (CRS-R; Range: 0 to 23; higher scores mean a better outcome) weekly.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Duration until consciousness is regained

    Time until patients show first signs of consciousness

    Time frame: up to 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lucca LF, Lofaro D, Pignolo L, Leto E, Ursino M, Cortese MD, Conforti D, Tonin P, Cerasa A. Outcome prediction in disorders of consciousness: the role of coma recovery scale revised. BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1293-7. PubMed 30999877 ↗
  • Portaccio E, Morrocchesi A, Romoli AM, Hakiki B, Taglioli MP, Lippi E, Di Renzone M, Grippo A, Macchi C; Intensive Rehabilitation Unit Study Group of the IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Italy. Improvement on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised During the First Four Weeks of Hospital Stay Predicts Outcome at Discharge in Intensive Rehabilitation After Severe Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):914-919. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 8. PubMed 29428346 ↗
  • Portaccio E, Morrocchesi A, Romoli AM, Hakiki B, Taglioli MP, Lippi E, Di Renzone M, Grippo A, Macchi C. Score on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at admission predicts outcome at discharge in intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(6):730-734. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1440420. Epub 2018 Feb 26. PubMed 29482376 ↗
  • Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Cozzolino A, Saltalamacchia A, Lullo F, Santoro L, Trojano L. Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology. 2013 Jan 29;80(5):464-70. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0f31. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23303855 ↗
  • Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Santoro L, Trojano L. Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology. 2010 Jul 20;75(3):239-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8cc. Epub 2010 Jun 16. PubMed 20554941 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Period of availability begins when results are published, at the earliest in Dec 2023

Access criteria: IPD can be obtained from the principal investigator upon reasonable request.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 84 months after the start.

Of 97 non-industry observational studies under Nervous System Diseases, half reached primary completion within 55 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 150. This study's planned 84 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 114 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 121.

Nervous System Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2020
First posted
Jun 24, 2020
StartActual
Jun 15, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2027
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date and oversight details
1 update, last Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04445649
Lead sponsor
BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2020
Start date
Jun 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Melanie Boltzmann, PhD
Contact
m.boltzmann@bdh-klinik-hessisch.oldendorf
0049 5152 781 256
Simone B Schmidt, PhD
Contact
si.schmidt@bdh-klinik-hessisch.oldendorf
0049 5152 781 215
Jens D Rollnik, MD
study director · BDH-Clinic Hessisch Oldendorf
Melanie Boltzmann, PhD
principal investigator · BDH-Clinic Hessisch Oldendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion