An observational study in Language Disorders and Aphasia, sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.
Sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy · Observational
The aim of speech therapy for people with aphasia is to improve their ability to communicate in daily life. Traditional evaluations focus on linguistic tasks, but they do not fully address everyday communication skills, which are crucial for creating personalized treatment goals. The study suggests a multimodal approach to language assessment, stressing the importance of gestures in communication. It calls for the development of tools that evaluate communication in a wider context, including factors like motivation, attention, awareness, and alternative communication strategies. Additionally, there is a need for tools specifically designed to assess communicative gestures.
The goal of speech therapy for individuals with aphasia is to improve their communication effectiveness, enabling them to communicate in daily life. Traditional aphasia assessments focus on linguistic processes (e.g., naming, comprehension, dictation), which are categorized under impairment in the ICF framework, while everyday communication skills fall under activity and participation. However, there is a lack of consensus and appropriate tools for assessing everyday communication in aphasic patients, which are crucial for setting personalized treatment goals. The study suggests an interactive, multimodal model of language assessment, emphasizing the role of gestures in communication. It calls for the development of scales and tests that assess communication in a broader context, including factors like motivation, attention, awareness, and alternative communication strategies, as well as questionnaires evaluating both the individual's and caregiver's perceptions of communicative effectiveness and daily life participation. Moreover, an assessment tool of communicative gestures is needed.
338 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia; 95 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 77 across 36 observational studies indexed under Aphasia.
Browse Aphasia studies →IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Compared within Aphasia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Language Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
person with aphasia
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patient admitted to the hospital for an intensive neurorehabilitation cycle or attending as an outpatient Diagnosis of language and communication disorders following a stroke in the right or left hemisphere Age > 18 years Ability to provide Native speaker of Italian (L1 Italian)
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Behavioral: conversational approach
The conversational approach in speech-language rehabilitation focuses on improving communication within real-life, functional contexts. It emphasizes natural, interactive communication, helping individuals engage in meaningful conversations and participate in daily activities. Therapy often involves practicing communication in real-life scenarios, incorporating verbal and non-verbal cues. The goal is to enhance confidence and effectiveness in communication, allowing individuals with speech or language difficulties to regain autonomy and engage more fully in social and professional settings. Additionally, the assessment process is based on these principles and should also take place in conversation, evaluating communication skills within realistic, everyday contexts to better guide treatment planning.
Communicative efficacy
Validity of the Communicative Efficacy Scale - Italian version: Content and construct validity assessed in aphasic patients; construct validity via correlation with established communication and gesture measures (correlation coefficients -1 to +1; closer to ±1 = stronger relationship). Reliability of the Communicative Efficacy Scale - Italian version: Inter- and intra-rater reliability evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Communicative efficacy refers to the ability to effectively convey thoughts, needs, and emotions in a way that others can understand. It involves clarity, adaptability in communication methods, effective interaction, and achieving communicative goals. In speech-language rehabilitation, enhancing communicative efficacy focuses on improving a person's ability to participate in social, personal, and professional interactions despite language impairments, aiming to increase confidence and meaningful engagement in everyday communication.
Time frame: 36 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy