ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05608096Updated Nov 8, 2022

European Registry for Hemadsorption in Sepsis With the Seraph Filter

An observational study in Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Infections - Pathogen Unspecified, sponsored by Croatian Society for Organ Support. Recruiting at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-08.

Sponsored by Croatian Society for Organ Support · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2023, 3 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although new techniques like extracorporeal blood purification have lately emerged, septic patients still have very high hospital mortality rates. Sepsis can be induced by either viremia, bacteriemia or in some cases both. Many studies have reported the effectiveness of different hemadsorbers, but patient sample sizes have been inadequate for definitive conclusions. Secondly, there are still no clear inclusion criteria as well as criteria for when to cease hemadsorption mostly due to immune dysregulation or cascade coagulation disorders. The aim of this observational prospective registry is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) in the treatment of septic ICU patients and to evaluate which cluster of these patients should benefit most with this therapy.

Read the detailed description

Hemadsorption was introduced in everyday clinical practice before the COVID-19 pandemic. The efficacy of hemadsorption removal of endotoxins and cytokines is still, by some, controversial due to the fact that most of the studies were performed in a small number of patients with very different diagnoses, comorbidities and disease severity. Furthemore, some studies enrolled patients over a prolonged period of time with very high SOFA scores and multi-organ failure where it is difficult to expect any significant effect of any kind of organ support therapy. The COSA registry reported that the treatment of COVID-19 patients with Seraph 100 was well tolerated and observed lower mortality in the registry when compared to calculated mortality.

The primary aim of this observational prospective, multi-center, multistate web-based registry is to define the effectiveness and outcome of Seraph 100 treatment(s), investigate possible advantages of early targeted treatment and to set indications/inclusion criteria for the treatment of ICU septic patients with the method of hemoadsorption.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Infections - Pathogen Unspecified
  • Disease
  • Critical Illness
  • Multi Organ Failure
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Keywords

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Sepsis
  • Critical Illness
  • Multi Organ Failure
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 150 across 1,162 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Croatian Society for Organ Support is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All medical institutions from European countries (Croatia, Finland, Germany, Italy, France, Greece, Slovenia) that provide extracorporeal blood purification treatments to septic critically ill patients are eligible for participation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Sepsis or septic shock: sepsis is defined as the presence of suspected or documented infections along with systemic inflammatory response syndrome; septic shock is defined as the presence of sepsis and acute circulatory failure according to European criteria Society for Intensive Care Medicine
  2. laboratory and clinical evidence of systemic inflammation: high levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 (>25 pg / ml); high values of inflammatory parameters from serum (leukocytes >15x10 9 / l, CRP >40 mg / l, procalcitonin >0.9 mg / l) and a high SOFA score (>2).
  3. clinical symptoms of hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors
  4. diagnosis of ARDS
  5. deterioration of respiratory status with the onset of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (respiration rate >30 / min, or oxygen saturation \<93%, or PaO2 / FiO2 ratio \<300mmHg).
  6. Admission to ICU

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

besides to the use of the hemoperfusion adopted (as from the manual of instructions), there are no exclusion criteria

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
28 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Hemoperfusion

    ICU septic patients treated with hemoperfusion

    Device: Hemoperfusion

  • non-hemoperfusion

    ICU septic patients non treated with hemoperfusion

Interventions

  • DeviceHemoperfusion

    Commercial membrane for extracorporeal blood purification (hemoperfusion)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival

    Overall Survival after Seraph 100 therapy session

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Define the inclusion criteria for hemoperfusion with Seraph 100 in ICU septic patients

    Define the inclusion criteria for extracorporeal blood purification (hemoperfusion) with Seraph 100 in ICU septic patients

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome (i.e. an improvement in hemodynamic stability and respiratory status will be combined to report SOFA score)

    Time frame: Immediately after first hemoperfusion procedure

  3. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome (i.e. an improvement in inflammatory status)

    Time frame: Immediately after first hemoperfusion procedure

  4. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome (i.e. an improvement in hemodynamic stability and respiratory status will be combined to report SOFA score)

    Time frame: 72 hours after finishing the hemoperfusion procedure

  5. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive short-term outcome (i.e. an improvement in inflammatory status)

    Time frame: 72 hours after finishing the hemoperfusion procedure

  6. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive long-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and positive long-term outcome, defined as patient survival at ICU discharge

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome (i.e. improvement in hemodynamic stability and respiratory status will be combined to report SOFA score)

    Time frame: Immediately after first hemoperfusion procedure in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT)

  8. The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome (i.e. improvement in inflammatory status)

    Time frame: Immediately after first hemoperfusion procedure in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT)

  9. The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome (i.e. an improvement in hemodynamic stability and respiratory status will be combined to report SOFA score)

    Time frame: 72 hours after finishing the procedures with the combination of hemoperfusion and extracorporeal organ support therapy

  10. The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive short-term outcome (i.e. improvement in inflammatory status)

    Time frame: 72 hours after finishing the procedures with the combination of hemoperfusion and extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT)

  11. The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive long-term outcome

    The effects of hemoperfusion in combination with other extracorporeal organ support therapies (i.e. ECMO, CRRT) on positive long-term outcome, defined as patient survival at ICU discharge

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and negative short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and negative short-term outcome (i.e. initial signs of humoral immune dysregulation (hypogammaglobulinemia defined as a gamma-globulin fraction below 10%) or cascade coagulation disorders (severe thrombocytopenia \<15,000 cells/uL or severe bleeding)

    Time frame: Immediately after first hemoperfusion procedure

  13. To assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and negative short-term outcome

    Define as to assess the correlation between hemoperfusion and negative short-term outcome (i.e. initial signs of humoral immune dysregulation (hypogammaglobulinemia defined as a gamma-globulin fraction below 10%) or cascade coagulation disorders (severe thrombocytopenia \<15,000 cells/uL or severe bleeding)

    Time frame: 72 hours after finishing the hemoperfusion procedure

  14. Length of ICU stay

    Time spend in the ICU after Seraph 100 therapy session

    Time frame: 28 days

  15. Length of Hospital stay

    Time spend in the hospital after Seraph 100 therapy session

    Time frame: 60 days

  16. Adverse events

    Report of any Seraph 100 therapy related adverse events

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2023, 8 months after the start.

Of 491 non-industry observational studies under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 543 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 26, 2022
First posted
Nov 8, 2022
StartActual
Oct 25, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
Last update
Nov 8, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05608096
Lead sponsor
Croatian Society for Organ Support
Collaborators
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
Responsible party
Vedran Premuzic (Principal Investigator, Croatian Society for Organ Support) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2022
Start date
Oct 25, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 8, 2022

Study contacts

Vedran Premuzic, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
vpremuzic@gmail.com
+385915274778

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion