ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05551377Updated May 9, 2024

Head-up Tilt Sleeping to Alleviate Orthostatic Hypotension, Supine Hypertension and Nocturia in Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Head-up tilt sleeping in Parkinson Disease and Parkinsonism, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-09.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 34 studies in Parkinson Disease by Radboud University Medical Center — 7 open to participants now, 13 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Parkinson Disease · Radboud University Medical Center.

Planned enrollment
17th of 22
50 · median 188
Started
2023
with 6 others
No phase
15 of 34
4 open now
Primary completion
2024-06
later than 1 of 12 live
Registered
21st of 34
by date

Among the 34 studies in Parkinson Disease by Radboud University Medical Center, this one is the 17th largest by planned enrollment of the 22 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2023, is one of 15 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 1 of the 12 other live ones, and was the 21st registered.

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 34 studies in Parkinson Disease by Radboud University Medical Center are open now, in 2 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 748 Parkinson Disease studies recruiting now, 311 (42%) set no upper age limit and 127 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 63 take children under 18; 189 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 34 studies in Parkinson Disease by Radboud University Medical Center, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Autonomic dysfunction is common and often underrecognized in Parkinson's disease (PD). Orthostatic hypotension (OH) affects up to a third of PD patients and often coincides with supine hypertension. This co-occurrence complicates pharmacological treatment as treatment of one can negatively affect the other. Head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) could improve both. This phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of this understudied intervention, leading to optimal implementation strategies.

Read the detailed description

Autonomic dysfunction is common and often underrecognized in Parkinson's disease (PD). Orthostatic hypotension (OH) affects up to a third of PD patients and about half of them also exhibit supine hypertension. In current clinical practice both are undertreated. The common co-occurrence of OH and supine hypertension complicates pharmacological treatment as improvement of one can be accomplished only at the expense of the other. Head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) is the only intervention known that could improve both. The concept of HUTS is based on several small-scale observational studies and expert opinion. Although HUTS has been proposed as an effective and even first choice non-pharmacological treatment for OH for over three decades, it is often not advised to patients because of lack of evidence on its effectiveness and on how to implement it. The Heads-Up trial is a multicenter home-based double-blind phase II RCT. The study aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of HUTS, leading to optimal implementation strategies of HUTS to treat orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension.

03

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Parkinsonism

Keywords

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Orthostatic hypotension
  • Supine hypertension
  • Autonomic dysfunction
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Orthostatic hypotension defined as a systolic BP decrease of ≥20 mmHg, or a diastolic decrease of ≥10 mmHg, within 3 min after changing from a supine to standing position OR mean standing BP of ≤75 mmHg (marker for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension). In patients with supine hypertension, a decrease in systolic BP of ≥ 30 mmHg is required;
  • Orthostatic intolerance: direct complaints (dizziness, blurry vision, etc.) and/or indirect signs (falls or freezing episodes that relate to postural challenge);
  • Supine hypertension defined as a systolic BP of ≥140 mmHg, and/or diastolic of ≥90 mmHg, after 5 min of supine rest;
  • Idiopathic PD or parkinsonism (multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, vascular parkinsonism and Lewy body dementia);
  • Ability to walk (with or without a walking aid), as subjectively determined by the researcher;
  • Stable medication regimens for orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension during the trial;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow instructions and complete questionnaires, as assessed by the researcher;
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    At T0, in-clinic inclusion, we will record basic characteristics and several questionnaires, we will also perform a short tilt-table-test and standing blood pressure (BP) test. Intake is followed by one week of horizontal sleeping for baseline home-based BP measurements. Participants in the intervention group will then sleep in a head-up tilt position for two weeks each in angles 6°, 12° and 18°. At the second and final in-clinic meeting, at T1, measurements done at T0 will be repeated, complemented with an assessment of barriers and facilitators of HUTS. During HUTS daily BP measurements will be done, and data will be collected on orthostatic tolerance, nighttime urine production, subjective comfort of HUTS, falls.

    Other: Head-up tilt sleeping

  • Other
    Delayed intervention group

    Follows the same structure as the intervention group, but starts with a HUTS placebo angle of 1° for two weeks, followed by two intervention angles of 6° and 12° for two weeks each. The 1°-angle serves as the control intervention.

    Other: Head-up tilt sleeping

Interventions

  • OtherHead-up tilt sleeping

    Whole-body head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) will be carried out in three different angles, each for the duration of two weeks. Prior to the first angle the participant will sleep in a horizontal position for 1 week. The different angles will be installed using a wedge between the mattress and bed frame.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average overnight supine blood pressure

    Average overnight supine blood pressure (mmHg) from the 24h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM)

    Time frame: Measured four times: in week 1, 3, 5 and 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Daily supine blood pressure

    Supine blood pressure (mmHg) measured every morning directly after awakening before getting out of bed

    Time frame: Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7

  2. Orthostatic blood pressure

    Standing orthostatic blood pressure test (mmHg). Measured in clinic and home-based guided by a researcher via video call.

    Time frame: Measured six times: in-clinic (T0; pre-intervention), in week 1, 3, 5 and 7, and in-clinic on the day after week 7 ends (T1; post-intervention)

  3. 24h ABPM parameters

    24h ABPM parameters blood pressure variability (mmHg), nocturnal blood pressure dipping (mmHg) and average daytime blood pressure (mmHg). Each of these measures will be derived from the 24 hour blood pressure measurements, and reported separately.

    Time frame: In week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  4. Orthostatic tolerance

    Self-reported burden of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension (Orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ)). The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher number meaning worse symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  5. Nocturia

    Self-reported frequency of daytime and night time urination and impact on quality of life (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Nocturia Module (ICIQ-N))

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  6. Subjective comfort of HUTS (head up tilted sleeping)

    Self-reported tolerability of the head up tilted sleeping at different angles including questions about sleep duration, sleep quality and comfort, and feeling rested in the morning.

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  7. Falls

    Self-reported falls and in case of a fall additional questions about the time and circumstances

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  8. Overnight change in body weight

    Weight (kg) difference between the evening and the morning, both measured after micturition

    Time frame: Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7

  9. Nighttime urine production

    Urine volume measured in a urinal (ml)

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7

  10. Barriers and facilitators of the intervention

    Structured interview

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (day after week 7, T1)

Other outcomes

  1. Timed up and go test (TUG)

    Measurement of the time that the participant takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  2. Symptoms of Parkinson's disease

    Movement disorders society unified disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS). Scores range from 0 to 199, with a higher score indicating a more severe impairment related to Parkinson's disease.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  3. Quality of sleep

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Score ranges from 0 to 21, with 21 indicating a worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  4. Fear of falling

    Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). Scores ranges from 16 to 67, with a higher score meaning a worse fear of falling.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  5. Subjective level of physical activity

    Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ). Score corresponds to time spend doing physical activities. A higher score indicates a more active last two weeks.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  6. Cardiovascular autonomic symptoms

    Selected cardiovascular questions from the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease - Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT). Scored 0 to 9, a worse score means more symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  7. Experienced quality of life

    Quality of life questionnaire: the Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  8. Experienced anxiety and depression

    Quality of life questionnaire: the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Scores range from 0 to 21 for depression and anxiety, a score between 0-7 means no anxiety or depression, 8-14 possibility of an anxiety or depressive disorder and 15-21 likely a depressive or anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

  9. Mental health

    Quality of life questionnaire: the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Scores range from 0 to 70, with a higher score meaning a better emotional wellbeing.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Relevant and anonymized research data will be shared in the validated research database DANS Easy (Data Archiving and Networked Services). It will also be shared with the funding foundation (MJFF).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Study protocol and statistical analysis plan are shared with the funding foundation prior to the onset of the study. After completion of the measurements and analysis we will share the clinical study report with the funding foundation and place relevant and anonymized data on the DANS Easy database.

Access criteria: Access to the data is restricted, meaning that researchers who are interested in re-use of the data are asked to contact the central contact person for permission. Approval is given after a signed agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2024, 17 months after the start.

Of 1,291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,367 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 7, 2022
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
StartActual
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 2024
Last update
May 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05551377
Collaborators
Leiden University Medical Center, Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2024

Study contacts

Roland D Thijs, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Leiden University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion