ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05251363BIO-CONDUCTUpdated Mar 18, 2025Results posted

BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead

An interventional study of Solia S lead in Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block and Left Bundle-Branch Block, sponsored by Biotronik, Inc.. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-18.

Sponsored by Biotronik, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
194
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bradycardia
  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Left Bundle-Branch Block
  • Cardiomyopathies
03

In context

Bradycardia

317 studies on the registry are indexed under Bradycardia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 194 is above the median of 100 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Bradycardia.

Browse Bradycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

Biotronik, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is a candidate for implantation of a BIOTRONIK pacemaker system, per standard guidelines. Single chamber, dual chamber, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with a Pacemaker (CRT-P) systems are allowed.
  • Patient has an implant planned to utilize left bundle branch area pacing within 30 days of consent
  • Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and provide written
  • Patient is available for follow-up visits on a regular basis for the expected duration of follow-up
  • Patient accepts Home Monitoring® concept
  • Patient age is greater than or equal to 18 years at time of consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient meets a standard for pacemaker system implant
  • Patient is currently implanted with a pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) device
  • Patient has had a previous unsuccessful attempt to place a lead in the LBB area
  • Patient has planned cardiac surgical procedures or interventional measures within 3 months after implant
  • Patient is expected to receive a heart transplant within 12 months
  • Patient less than 12 months
  • Patient has the presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder
  • Patient reports pregnancy at the time of enrollment
  • Patient is enrolled in any other cardiac clinical study during the course of the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
194 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Solia S LBB lead

    Device: Solia S lead

Interventions

  • DeviceSolia S lead

    The Solia S pacing lead will be implanted in the LBB area for patients who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria and give written informed consent.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 3 Months

    The overall rate of serious Solia S Left Bundle Branch (LBB) lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBB lead that occur through 3 months post-implant. The definition of adverse device effect is an untoward medical occurrence (e.g. disease, injury) related to the use of a study device. Pacemaker lead-related examples include events such as lead dislodgements or lead malfunction. The Solia S LBB lead complication-free rate is calculated as the number of subjects without one or more adverse device effect complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying primary safety endpoint event. Classification of adverse device related events from the pool of potential events is determined by a clinical events committee (CEC). The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.

    Time frame: 3 months post implant

  2. Implant Success Rate of the Solia S Lead in LBB Area

    The percentage of subjects with Solia S placed successfully in the LBBA divided by the total number of consented study subjects in whom an implant of Solia S in the LBBA was attempted.

    Time frame: at implant procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline Through 12 Months Post-Implant

    The change in the physical function Short Form-36 (SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey) QOL subscale was calculated as the mean change from baseline to 12-month follow-up for all subjects that completed both the baseline QOL and 12-month QOL questionnaire. The physical function subscale of Short Form-36 is comprised of ten questions out of the total of 36 questions. The responses to the ten questions relating to physical function were averaged at baseline and at 12 months. The difference in the averages (12 months minus baseline) is reported as the outcome for secondary endpoint 1. Note that each question and each component is scored such that a higher score defines a more favorable health state. Each is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.

    Time frame: 12 months post implant

  2. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 6 Months

    The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 6 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percentage of participants without SADE.

    Time frame: 6 months post implant

  3. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 12 Months

    The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 12 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.

    Time frame: 12 months post implant

  4. Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

    Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 3 months post implant

  5. Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

    R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 3 months post implant

  6. Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

    Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 3 months post implant

  7. Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

    Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 6 months post implant

  8. Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

    R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 6 months post implant

  9. Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

    Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 6 months post implant

  10. Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

    Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 12 months post implant

  11. Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

    R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 12 months post implant

  12. Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

    Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 12 months post implant

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2025

Participant flow

The first study subject was consented on December 12, 2022. Study enrollment was completed on September 22, 2023, with a total of 194 subjects consented at 14 sites.

Implant
Participant flow — Implant
MilestoneSolia S LBB Lead
Started186
Completed178
Not completed8
Withdrew: Subject did not meet lbba implant criteria8
Overall Study After Implant Period
Participant flow — Overall Study After Implant Period
MilestoneSolia S LBB Lead
Started178
Protocol follow-up: 3-month167
Protocol follow-up: 6-month163
Protocol follow-up (final): 12-month155
Completed155
Not completed23
Withdrew: Death9
Withdrew: Solia s lead in lbba position extracted4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Physician decision1
Withdrew: Subject moved from investigational center3

Outcome measures

PrimarySerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 3 Months

The overall rate of serious Solia S Left Bundle Branch (LBB) lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBB lead that occur through 3 months post-implant. The definition of adverse device effect is an untoward medical occurrence (e.g. disease, injury) related to the use of a study device. Pacemaker lead-related examples include events such as lead dislodgements or lead malfunction. The Solia S LBB lead complication-free rate is calculated as the number of subjects without one or more adverse device effect complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying primary safety endpoint event. Classification of adverse device related events from the pool of potential events is determined by a clinical events committee (CEC). The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.

Time frame:
3 months post implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants without SADE
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 3 Months
Percentage of participants without SADEIntent-to-treat (ITT) - Primary Endpoint 1
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 3 Months98 (95.4 to 99.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Intent-to-treat (ITT) - Primary Endpoint 1 · Exact binomial test · p = <0.0001
PrimaryImplant Success Rate of the Solia S Lead in LBB Area

The percentage of subjects with Solia S placed successfully in the LBBA divided by the total number of consented study subjects in whom an implant of Solia S in the LBBA was attempted.

Time frame:
at implant procedure
Reported as:
Number · % of participants with implant success
Implant Success Rate of the Solia S Lead in LBB Area
% of participants with implant successIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Primary Endpoint 2 (Efficacy)
Implant Success Rate of the Solia S Lead in LBB Area95.7 (91.7 to 98.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Intent-to-Treat (ITT) - Primary Endpoint 2 (Efficacy) · Exact binomial test · p = < 0.0001
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) From Baseline Through 12 Months Post-Implant

The change in the physical function Short Form-36 (SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey) QOL subscale was calculated as the mean change from baseline to 12-month follow-up for all subjects that completed both the baseline QOL and 12-month QOL questionnaire. The physical function subscale of Short Form-36 is comprised of ten questions out of the total of 36 questions. The responses to the ten questions relating to physical function were averaged at baseline and at 12 months. The difference in the averages (12 months minus baseline) is reported as the outcome for secondary endpoint 1. Note that each question and each component is scored such that a higher score defines a more favorable health state. Each is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.

Time frame:
12 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline Through 12 Months Post-Implant
Score on a ScaleIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 1 (QOL)
Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline Through 12 Months Post-Implant11.4 (7.4 to 15.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Intent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 1 (QOL) · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
SecondarySerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 6 Months

The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 6 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percentage of participants without SADE.

Time frame:
6 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of participants without SADE
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 6 Months
Percentage of participants without SADEIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 2 (SADE-Free Rate at 6-Mo)
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 6 Months96.7 (93.7 to 98.6)
SecondarySerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 12 Months

The overall rate of serious Solia S LBBA lead related adverse device effects and serious implant procedure events related to the Solia S LBBA lead that occur through 12 months post-implant. The Solia S LBBA lead complication-free rate per subject, which was calculated as the number of subjects without one or more complications divided by the total number of study subjects successfully enrolled and subjects undergoing an unsuccessful implant attempt who have a qualifying safety endpoint event. The complication-free rate is expressed in percent.

Time frame:
12 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of participants without SADE
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 12 Months
Percentage of participants without SADEIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 2 (SADE-Free Rate at 12-Mo)
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)-Free Rate at 12 Months96.1 (92.6 to 98.2)
SecondaryPacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
3 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Volts @ 0.4ms
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months
Volts @ 0.4msIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 3 (Pacing Threshold at 3-Mo)
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months0.94 ± 0.26
SecondarySensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
3 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · mV
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months
mVIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 4 (R-wave Sensed Amplitude at 3-Mo)
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 3 Months12.37 ± 4.16
SecondaryPacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 3 Months

Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 3 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
3 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Impedance (Ω)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 3 Months
Impedance (Ω)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 5 (Pacing Impedance at 3-Mo)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 3 Months540.4 ± 96.4
SecondaryPacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
6 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Volts @ 0.4ms
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months
Volts @ 0.4msIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 3 (Pacing Threshold at 6-Mo)
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months0.97 ± 0.27
SecondarySensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
6 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · mV
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months
mVIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 4 (R-wave Sensed Amplitude at 6-Mo)
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 6 Months12.83 ± 4.78
SecondaryPacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 6 Months

Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 6 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
6 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Impedance (Ω)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 6 Months
Impedance (Ω)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 5 (Pacing Impedance at 6-Mo)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 6 Months526.7 ± 96.7
SecondaryPacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

Pacing threshold measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
12 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Volts @ 0.4ms
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months
Volts @ 0.4msIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 3 (Pacing Threshold at 12-Mo)
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months0.98 ± 0.29
SecondarySensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

R-wave sensing amplitude measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
12 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · mV
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months
mVIntent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 4 (R-wave Sensed Amplitude at 12-Mo)
Sensing Measurements for Solia S Lead at 12 Months12.76 ± 4.83
SecondaryPacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 12 Months

Pacing impedance measurements for Solia S leads implanted in the LBBA at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame:
12 months post implant
Reported as:
Mean · Impedance (Ω)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 12 Months
Impedance (Ω)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) - Secondary Endpoint 5 (Pacing Impedance at 12-Mo)
Pacing Impedance for Solia S Lead at 12 Months521.8 ± 96.6

Adverse events

Collected over Overall study duration of 12 months: from implant (or implant attempt) through each subject's exit date. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant or Unsuccessful Implant Attempt in the LBBA9/186 (4.8%)52/186 (28%)0/186 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent serious events
EventSubjects With a Successful Solia S Implant or Unsuccessful Implant Attempt in the LBBA
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Cardiac DisordersCardiac disorders17/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal DisordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Surgical and Medical ProceduresSurgical and medical procedures10/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Infections and InfestationsInfections and infestations8/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - General DisordersGeneral disorders8/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Renal and Urinary DisordersRenal and urinary disorders5/186
Other Implanted System Related - RA Lead DislodgementProduct Issues4/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Vascular DisordersVascular disorders4/186
Solia S LBBA Lead Related - Lead DislodgementProduct Issues3/186
Not Implanted System or Procedure Related - Gastrointestinal DisordersGastrointestinal disorders3/186

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Mean76.2 ± 9.12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Female65
Male113
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Hispanic or Latino8
Not Hispanic or Latino156
Unknown or Not Reported14
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American15
White142
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported17
Height
Height(Inches)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Mean67.4 ± 4.23
Weight
Weight(Pounds)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Mean186.3 ± 41.66
BMI
BMI(kg/m²)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Mean28.8 ± 5.43
Medical History
Medical History(Participants)Subjects With a Successful Solia S Implant in the LBBA
Heart Failure44
Cardiomyopathy13
Coronary Artery Disease61
Prior Myocardial Infarction22
Atrial Fibrillation81
Diabetes Mellitus41
Hypertension152
Sleep Apnea47
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease23
Cerebrovascular Disease (e.g., TIA / Stroke)33
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)44
Valvular Heart Disease46
Peripheral Artery Disease16

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Cardiology Associates Medical Group
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Washington Hospital Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Health Care System
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Cardiology Associates
    Tupelo, Mississippi 38801, United States
  • NYU Langone Health
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Geisinger
    Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18711, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant level data collected within the study will be shared for approved requests.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: The data will be available beginning no later than 12 months and ending 3 years after study.

Access criteria: Proposals should be directed to BIOTRONIK Clinical Studies (BIOTRONIK Inc., Attn: Clinical Studies, 6024 Jean Road, Lake Oswego, OR; 1-800-547-0394). BIOTRONIK, in consultation with the National Principal Investigator, will review and critique requests for scientific merit, fiscal feasibility, and logistical feasibility. If approved, the data requestors will need to sign a data use/access agreement prior to obtaining the data. BIOTRONIK reserves the right to delete any confidential information or other proprietary information (including trade secrets and patent protected materials) from the shared information.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05251363
Lead sponsor
Biotronik, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2022
Start date
Dec 12, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 9, 2024
Completion
Oct 8, 2024
Results posted
Mar 18, 2025
Last update
Mar 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion