ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07923604NAVAPNEAUpdated Nov 10, 2026

nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks

An interventional study of nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode and nCPAP mode in Apnea of Prematurity, sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged Up to 4 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Geneva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Eligibility revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 4 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) backup ventilation (nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode) reduces the rate of severe apnea in extremely preterm infants ≤28 weeks' gestation compared with standard nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP mode). Severe apnea episodes is defined as breathing pause with oxygen levels ( SpO2) below 85% lasting at least 5 seconds and/or heart rate (HR) below 100 beats/minute lasting at least 5 seconds.

Each participant will receive both interventions in a randomized order, serving as their own control. The total duration of the intervention will be 24h. Each intervention period will last 12 hours. A washout period of 3 hours will be included between intervention periods to minimize potential carryover effects.

Randomized sequences to avoid order effects:

  • Sequence A: nCPAP mode → nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode
  • Sequence B: nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode →nCPAP mode
02

Conditions studied

  • Apnea of Prematurity

Keywords

  • Apnea
  • nCPAP
  • nCPAP-NAVA-Backup
  • Prematurity
  • Desaturation
  • Bradycardia
  • NAVAPNEA
  • NAVA
  • Back-up
03

In context

Apnea

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 60 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Geneva is the lead sponsor of 379 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 4 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Born at ≤28 weeks gestational age
  • Currently receiving nCPAP mode as part of routine care
  • Receiving caffeine citrate at a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg/day
  • An average of ≥1 severe apnea per hour over a 6-hour period (apnea associated with SpO₂\<85% during ≥ 5 seconds and/or HR \<100 bpm during ≥ 5 seconds) or an average of >2 severe apnea per hour over a 2-hour period
  • Written obtained from the legal representatives before inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major congenital anomalies (e.g., congenital diaphragmatic hernia, significant cardiac malformations)
  • Known genetic syndrome affecting respiratory function
  • Immediate indication for endotracheal intubation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV)
  • Parental refusal or withdrawal of consent
  • Previous inclusion in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequence A: nCPAP then nCPAP-NAVA-Backup

    Preterm infants randomized to receive 12 hours of standard nCPAP mode followed by 12 hours of nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode (total 24 hours) on a Servo-n ventilator. A 3-hour washout period at the start of each period is excluded from analysis.

    Device: nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode · Device: nCPAP mode

  • Experimental
    Sequence B: nCPAP-NAVA-backup then nCPAP

    Preterm infants randomized to receive 12 hours of nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode followed by 12 hours of standard nCPAP mode (total 24 hours) on a Servo-n ventilator. A 3-hour washout period at the start of each period is excluded from analysis.

    Device: nCPAP-NAVA-backup mode · Device: nCPAP mode

Interventions

  • DevicenCPAP-NAVA-backup mode

    Standard nasal CPAP delivered via a Servo-n ventilator, with continuous monitoring of the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) through an Edi catheter that also serves as the feeding tube. When an apnea exceeds the preset apnea time, pressure-controlled backup ventilation is triggered automatically. Backup and PEEP settings follow unit standards, and PEEP is kept constant throughout the study. Duration: 12 hours.

  • DevicenCPAP mode

    Standard nasal CPAP delivered via nasal prongs or mask on the same Servo-n ventilator and circuit, with PEEP and FiO₂ managed according to standard clinical practice. Duration: 12 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of severe apnea episodes per 9-hour observation period

    Number of severe apnea episodes per 9-hour observation period, defined as an apnea associated with oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ \< 85%) lasting ≥ 5 seconds and/or bradycardia (Heart rate (HR) \< 100 bpm) lasting ≥ 5 seconds

    Time frame: Per 9-hour observation period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of isolated oxygen desaturation episodes

    SpO₂ \< 85% for ≥ 5 seconds, not associated with a severe apnea episode

    Time frame: Per 9-hour observation period

  2. Number of isolated bradycardia episodes

    HR \< 100 bpm for ≥ 5 seconds, not associated with a severe apnea episode

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  3. Number of hyperoxia episodes (SpO₂ > 94% for ≥ 5 seconds)

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  4. Percentage of time spent with SpO₂ < 85%

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  5. Percentage of time spent with SpO₂ > 94%

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  6. Percentage of time spent with HR < 100 bpm

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  7. Number of apnea episodes requiring nurse intervention

    tactile stimulation and/or increase in FiO₂

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  8. Need for escalation of respiratory support during the observation period

    Defined as requirement for transition to non-invasive ventilation mode or endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  9. Infant comfort assessed using the EDIN score (Échelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-Né)

    EDIN will be recorded every 3 hours (0-15), yielding up to 3 measurements per 9-hour observation period. The mean EDIN score over each observation period will be used

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

  10. Gastrointestinal tolerance

    Grade 1: good tolerance - enteral feeding maintained at prescribed volume with no significant gastric residuals ; Grade 2: moderate intolerance - enteral feeding volume reduced due to gastric residuals or clinical concern ;Grade 3: poor tolerance - enteral feeding discontinued with initiation of continuous gastric suctioning. The worst grade recorded during each 9-hour observation period will be used as the summary measure for analysis.

    Time frame: per 9-hour observation period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Eligibility
Maximum age none→4 Months
Nov 10, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Eligibility Maximum age none→4 Months
  2. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923604
Responsible party
Dimitra Papasavva (Physician, University Hospital, Geneva) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion