ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05062564LIPICATUpdated Jul 21, 2022

Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye

An interventional study of LipiFlow Thermal pulsation system and Eyelid warm compresses plus massages in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Cataract and Surgery--Complications, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-21.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2022, 4 years 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a disease of the ocular surface which may be secondary to a variety of causes, including cataract surgery. DED is characterized by loss of tear film stability and dry eye symptoms, and its pathogenesis is related to corneal nerve injury, decreased goblet cells, inflammation of the ocular surface, and dysfunction of the meibomian glands (MGD). MGD is the main cause of evaporative DED and can cause irregularity of the ocular surface, affecting the accuracy of the biometric calculation. In addition, it is a risk factor for DED exacerbation after cataract surgery, that may occur in about 40% of cases. Current therapies for DED include artificial tears, warm compresses, manual squeezing of the glands, eyelid hygiene, omega-3 fatty acids, topical cyclosporine, serum tears, topical azithromycin, oral doxycycline. The above therapies in some cases can provide only transient relief, affecting the outcome of cataract surgery and the quality of life of patients. Therefore, stabilization of the ocular surface before cataract surgery is important to achieve better post-operative comfort and a better refractive result. The introduction of LipiFlow thermal pulsation treatment (LTP) represents a controlled method of squeezing the obstructed Meibomian glands by applying heat to the upper and lower eyelids and simultaneously applying pulsatile pressure to the eyelid skin surfaces. The aim of our study will be to evaluate the effect of preoperative LipiFlow therapy in patients with age-related cataracts and mild to moderate MGD in reducing postoperative DED.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Cataract
  • Surgery--Complications
  • Dry Eye
  • Blepharitis
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

170 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is close to the median of 49 across 141 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women ≥18 years old
  • Patients affected by age-related cataract \<3 according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III scale (LOCS III)
  • Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) diagnosed using slit lamp examination, following the criteria reported in the paper Arita R. et al, Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137.
  • Fluorescein tear BUT \<7 seconds

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with documented history and / or clinical signs of concomitant presence of an eye infection caused by viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) or fungi in the previous 3 months.
  • Patients with anterior blepharitis or Demodex
  • Meibomian gland atrophy score greater than 2/3
  • Subject treated with drugs that can have effects on MGD prior to inclusion in the study
  • Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic eye inflammation recurrent in the previous 3 months (e.g. retinitis, macular inflammation, choroiditis, uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis)
  • Eyelid abnormalities affecting eyelid function (entropion, ectropion, neoplasia, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis)
  • Abnormalities of the ocular surface that compromise the integrity of the cornea (e.g.

previous chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, corneal dystrophy)

  • Subjects who underwent eye surgery in the previous 3 months, including intraocular, oculo-plastic, corneal or refractive surgery
  • Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, rheumatism, immune diseases and other serious systemic diseases
  • Pregnant or lactating women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LipiFlow group

    Single preoperative treatment with the thermal pulsation system LipiFlow within two months before cataract surgery

    Device: LipiFlow Thermal pulsation system

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Eyelid warm compresses plus eyelid massage twice a day for the preoperative month

    Procedure: Eyelid warm compresses plus massages

Interventions

  • DeviceLipiFlow Thermal pulsation system

    Single treatment with LipiFlow thermal pulsation system on the eyelids within two months before surgery

  • ProcedureEyelid warm compresses plus massages

    Eyelid warm compresses plus massages twice a day for the preoperative month

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NIBUT (Non-Invasive Break-Up Time)

    The difference between the change in NIBUT of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in NIBUT of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tear meniscus height

    The difference between the change in tear meniscus height of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in tear meniscus height of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

  2. Schirmer test I

    The difference between the change in Schirmer test I of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in Schirmer test I of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

  3. Corneal fluorescein staining

    The difference between the change in corneal fluorescein staining of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in corneal fluorescein staining of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

  4. SPEED (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire) questionnaire score

    The difference between the change in SPEED questionnaire score of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in SPEED questionnaire score of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

  5. Meibomian gland status assessed using confocal microscopy

    The difference between the change in Meibomian gland status of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in Meibomian gland status of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

  6. Eyelid margin assessed using slit lamp examination

    The difference between the change in eyelid margins of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

    Time frame: The difference between the change in eyelid margins of LipiFlow group and control group between Visit 0 (screening/baseline) and Visit 2 (one month after surgery)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Eye clinic, Careggi University hospital
    Florence, FI 50134, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arita R, Minoura I, Morishige N, Shirakawa R, Fukuoka S, Asai K, Goto T, Imanaka T, Nakamura M. Development of Definitive and Reliable Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PubMed 27345733 ↗
  • Mencucci R, Mercuri S, Cennamo M, Morelli A, Favuzza E. Efficacy of vector thermal pulsation treatment in reducing postcataract surgery dry eye disease in patients affected by meibomian gland dysfunction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Apr 1;49(4):423-429. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001124. PubMed 36729441 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We have not planned to share individual participant data (IPD)

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2021 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 4 months.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2021
First posted
Sep 30, 2021
StartActual
Sep 7, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jan 17, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 17, 2022
Last update
Jul 21, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05062564
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Responsible party
Rita Mencucci (Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2021
Start date
Sep 7, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2022
Completion
Jan 17, 2022
Last update
Jul 21, 2022

Study contacts

Rita Mencucci, MD
principal investigator · AOU Careggi

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion