ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07692880Updated Jul 9, 2026

Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.

An interventional study of digital indirect bonding technique and conventional indirect bonding technique in Malocclusion, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-09.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques for fixed orthodontic bracket placement in adolescent patients requiring treatment in both dental arches.

Each participant will receive both bonding techniques, with allocation of the digital and conventional indirect bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization. The study will evaluate the time required to complete bracket bonding procedures and the early clinical performance of the two techniques, assessed by bracket failure within the first month after appliance placement.

Read the detailed description

Indirect bonding has been proposed as an alternative to direct bonding for the placement of orthodontic brackets, with potential advantages in terms of clinical efficiency, bracket positioning, and patient comfort. In recent years, computer-aided three-dimensional design and manufacturing methods have enabled the production of digital transfer trays for indirect bonding, offering a potentially more standardized workflow compared with conventional laboratory-based procedures.

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment in both the upper and lower arches. Each participant will receive both techniques, with the allocation of the digital and conventional bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization.

In the digital indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a digital workflow and brackets will be bonded using a pre-coated adhesive system. In the conventional indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a standard laboratory workflow and brackets will be bonded using a conventional orthodontic adhesive system.

The study will assess the procedural efficiency of the two techniques by recording the time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure. Early clinical performance will be evaluated by recording bracket failures during the first month of orthodontic treatment. All procedures and follow-up assessments will be performed in a clinical orthodontic setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Malocclusion

323 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 37 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi is the lead sponsor of 77 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 12 to 18 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment on both upper and lower arches
  • Presence of full permanent dentition, including erupted second molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of dental anomalies in number (supernumerary or missing teeth) in either arch
  • Orthodontic treatment plans involving tooth extractions in either arch
  • Nickel allergy
  • History of cleft lip and/or palate
  • Craniofacial syndromes
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Digital indirect bonding in the upper arch and conventional indirect bonding in the lower arch

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive digital indirect bonding in the upper arch and conventional indirect bonding in the lower arch.

    Device: digital indirect bonding technique · Device: conventional indirect bonding technique

  • Active comparator
    Conventional indirect bonding in the upper arch and digital indirect bonding in the lower arch

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive conventional indirect bonding in the upper arch and digital indirect bonding in the lower arch.

    Device: digital indirect bonding technique · Device: conventional indirect bonding technique

Interventions

  • Devicedigital indirect bonding technique

    Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a digital indirect bonding technique

  • Deviceconventional indirect bonding technique

    Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a conventional indirect bonding technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time required to complete bracket bonding procedures, measured in minutes

    The time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure will be measured in minutes for each participant, from the beginning of the bonding procedure to completion of bracket placement, using the assigned adhesive system.

    Time frame: During procedure (from the beginning of bracket bonding to completion of bracket placement)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bracket failure rate within the first month of orthodontic treatment assessed by clinical examination

    Bracket failure will be assessed by clinical examination and recorded as the number of brackets detached from the tooth surface within the first month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance.

    Time frame: 1 month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 153 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Malocclusion, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 163 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2025
First posted
Jul 9, 2026
StartActual
Sep 3, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 24, 2026
Last update
Jul 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07692880
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 3, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 24, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 9, 2026

Study contacts

Lorenzo Franchi
Contact
lorenzo.franchi@unifi.it
+390557945602

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion