ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05022121SUPPORTUpdated Mar 15, 2024Results posted

Integrated Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management for Back Related Leg Pain

An interventional study of Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM) and Medical Care in Low Back Pain, Sciatica and Back Related Leg Pain, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-15.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Guidelines advocate several complementary modalities as alternatives to drugs and other invasive treatments for chronic low back pain (LBP) conditions. However, there is little high-quality research investigating treatments for back-related leg pain, one of the more severe and disabling presentations of LBP. The investigators are conducting a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a future phase II multi-site randomized clinical trial (RCT). The future trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of a novel supported biopsychosocial self-management (SBSM) intervention versus Medical Care (MC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Sciatica
  • Back Related Leg Pain
  • Pain, Chronic
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,216 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Of its 136 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 95 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Back-related leg pain (BRLP) consistent with the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classifications 2-4 (radiating pain into proximal or distal extremity with or without neurological signs).
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Back-related leg pain severity of 3 or higher at all screening assessments (0 to 10 scale)
  • Episode duration of 12 weeks or more
  • Ability to read English fluently

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal stenosis (QTF 7)
  • Specific, non-mechanical causes of BRLP (QTF 11; e.g. infection, tumor)
  • to study interventions (e.g. spinal fracture (QTF 5))
  • Inflammatory conditions of the lumbar spine (QTF 11)
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Progressive neurological deficits
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Pregnancy, nursing
  • Ongoing care from another healthcare provider for BRLP
  • Severe unmanaged comorbid conditions (e.g. substance abuse, major depressive disorder, stage 3 hypertension).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

    Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

    Behavioral: Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

  • Active comparator
    Medical Care

    Medical Care

    Drug: Medical Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

    Participants receive training and instruction in skills to engage in healthy physical, psychological, and social self-management behaviors. This will be accomplished through 6-12 sessions with a trained chiropractor or physical therapist. Patients will receive training and instruction in exercises targeting posture, strength, stabilization, and mobility based on their individual needs. They will learn psychological strategies including problem solving and cognitive restructuring to address unhelpful thoughts and emotions. Social strategies include pleasant activity planning with a social focus, and communication techniques for navigating relationships to garner support for self-sufficiency. Other elements include providing key evidence based information about BRLP and spinal manipulation therapies (SMT). SMT will include manipulation, mobilization and soft-tissue treatment. Other intervention elements include enablement, persuasion, and resources and materials to support the patient.

  • DrugMedical Care

    Medical care will be comprised of primarily medication management, which is a standard first-line approach for back-related leg pain in primary care. Choice of medications is informed by the current evidence and the American College of Physicians guidelines on noninvasive treatment for LBP which balances evidence for risks and benefits when making recommendations. Decisions regarding medication selection will be made collaboratively between the study provider and patient after a discussion of risk/benefit profiles and patient preferences, including prior response. Study providers licensed to prescribe FDA-approved medications will call-in the prescription for the medication of choice to the participant's preferred pharmacy, as is typical in clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Particpants Screened Per Month

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the average number of participants screened per month is reported

    Time frame: 6 month period of active study screening

  2. Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are Female

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of female participants in the study is reported

    Time frame: 6 month period of active study screening

  3. Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of participants from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

    Time frame: 6 month period of active study screening

  4. Number of Participants Enrolled Per Month

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the average number of participants recruited per month is reported.

    Time frame: 6 month period of active study screening

  5. Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are Female

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of female participants enrolled in the study is reported.

    Time frame: 6 month period of active study enrollment

  6. Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of participants enrolled from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

    Time frame: 6 month period of active enrollment

  7. Percentage of Enrollees Not Receiving Any Treatment

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees not receiving any treatment is reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  8. Percentage of Enrollees Receiving Prohibited Treatments

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees receiving prohibited treatments, (contamination), during the 12-week intervention phase of the study is reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  9. Percentage of Enrollees Satisfied With Treatment

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, treatment satisfaction was reported by participants via a 7-point Likert satisfaction scale, ranging from 1, "completely satisfied," to 7, "completely dissatisfied," where lower numbers indicate greater satisfaction. The percentage of enrollees satisfied with treatment is reported as a percent value representing those who choose "somewhat satisfied" or better on the scale.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  10. Percentage of Enrollees Attending Required Sessions

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees attending the minimum number of required study sessions (6 for SBSM and 2 for Medical Care) are reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  11. Percentage of Enrollees in Supported Biopsychosocial Self-management Group Reporting Participation in Home Practice

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the supported biopsychosocial self-management arm of the study who self-report participation in home treatment practice is reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  12. Percentage of Enrollees in Medical Care Group Reporting Taking Medications as Prescribed

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the medical care arm self-reporting taking medications as prescribed is reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  13. Percentage of Provider Visits Where All Required Intervention Activities Were Delivered

    As a measure of provider fidelity, the percentage of provider vists where 100% of required intervention activities were delivered is reported.

    Time frame: Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  14. Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 3 Assessment

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 3 assessment is reported.

    Time frame: Month 3 assessment

  15. Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 6 Assessment

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 6 assessment is reported.

    Time frame: Month 6 assessment

  16. Percentage of Weekly Pain Severity and Frequency Assessments Completed

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of weekly pain severity and frequency assessments completed by participants is reported.

    Time frame: Through completion of all weekly assessments, an average of 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Started2022
Completed1920
Not completed12
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up02

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Particpants Screened Per Month

As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the average number of participants screened per month is reported

Time frame:
6 month period of active study screening
Reported as:
Mean · participants per month
Number of Particpants Screened Per Month
participants per monthScreened Participants
Number of Particpants Screened Per Month103 (26 to 247)
PrimaryPercentage of Screened Participants Who Are Female

As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of female participants in the study is reported

Time frame:
6 month period of active study screening
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are Female
ParticipantsScreened Participants
Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are Female414
PrimaryPercentage of Screened Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of participants from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

Time frame:
6 month period of active study screening
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations
ParticipantsScreened Participants
Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations168
PrimaryNumber of Participants Enrolled Per Month

As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the average number of participants recruited per month is reported.

Time frame:
6 month period of active study screening
Reported as:
Mean · participants per month
Number of Participants Enrolled Per Month
participants per monthEnrolled Participants
Number of Participants Enrolled Per Month7 (3 to 11)
PrimaryPercentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are Female

As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of female participants enrolled in the study is reported.

Time frame:
6 month period of active study enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are Female
ParticipantsEnrolled Participants
Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are Female25
PrimaryPercentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of participants enrolled from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

Time frame:
6 month period of active enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations
ParticipantsEnrolled Participants
Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations8
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Not Receiving Any Treatment

As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees not receiving any treatment is reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Not Receiving Any Treatment
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Not Receiving Any Treatment01
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Receiving Prohibited Treatments

As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees receiving prohibited treatments, (contamination), during the 12-week intervention phase of the study is reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Receiving Prohibited Treatments
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Receiving Prohibited Treatments11
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Satisfied With Treatment

As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, treatment satisfaction was reported by participants via a 7-point Likert satisfaction scale, ranging from 1, "completely satisfied," to 7, "completely dissatisfied," where lower numbers indicate greater satisfaction. The percentage of enrollees satisfied with treatment is reported as a percent value representing those who choose "somewhat satisfied" or better on the scale.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Satisfied With Treatment
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Satisfied With Treatment1714
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Attending Required Sessions

As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees attending the minimum number of required study sessions (6 for SBSM and 2 for Medical Care) are reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Attending Required Sessions
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Attending Required Sessions1920
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees in Supported Biopsychosocial Self-management Group Reporting Participation in Home Practice

As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the supported biopsychosocial self-management arm of the study who self-report participation in home treatment practice is reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees in Supported Biopsychosocial Self-management Group Reporting Participation in Home Practice
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)
Percentage of Enrollees in Supported Biopsychosocial Self-management Group Reporting Participation in Home Practice19
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees in Medical Care Group Reporting Taking Medications as Prescribed

As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the medical care arm self-reporting taking medications as prescribed is reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees in Medical Care Group Reporting Taking Medications as Prescribed
ParticipantsMedical Care
Percentage of Enrollees in Medical Care Group Reporting Taking Medications as Prescribed17
PrimaryPercentage of Provider Visits Where All Required Intervention Activities Were Delivered

As a measure of provider fidelity, the percentage of provider vists where 100% of required intervention activities were delivered is reported.

Time frame:
Through study treatment, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of units · Visits
Percentage of Provider Visits Where All Required Intervention Activities Were Delivered
VisitsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Provider Visits Where All Required Intervention Activities Were Delivered11179
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 3 Assessment

As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 3 assessment is reported.

Time frame:
Month 3 assessment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 3 Assessment
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 3 Assessment1820
PrimaryPercentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 6 Assessment

As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 6 assessment is reported.

Time frame:
Month 6 assessment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 6 Assessment
ParticipantsSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 6 Assessment1820
PrimaryPercentage of Weekly Pain Severity and Frequency Assessments Completed

As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of weekly pain severity and frequency assessments completed by participants is reported.

Time frame:
Through completion of all weekly assessments, an average of 6 months
Reported as:
Count of units · Weekly Surveys
Percentage of Weekly Pain Severity and Frequency Assessments Completed
Weekly SurveysSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Percentage of Weekly Pain Severity and Frequency Assessments Completed461479

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)12/20 (60%)
Medical Care0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)14/22 (63.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Fracture injury after fallMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/202/22
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventSupported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical Care
Back problems - increased back or leg painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/208/22
Back problems - soreness/stiffnessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/205/22
Back problems - new back or leg painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/206/22
Other problems - sleep problemsGeneral disorders3/205/22
Gastrointestinal problems - abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/204/22
Other problems - drowsinessGeneral disorders3/204/22
Other problems - weight gain or lossGeneral disorders2/204/22
Gastrointestinal problems - constipationGastrointestinal disorders3/202/22
Mental health problems - emotional discomfortGeneral disorders3/201/22
Back problems - numbness or tinglingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/203/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical CareTotal
Mean54.3 ± 14.651.6 ± 14.052.9 ± 14.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical CareTotal
Female111425
Male9817
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino202040
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)Medical CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American044
White181533
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported011
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05022121
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 26, 2021
Start date
Jan 26, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2023
Completion
Feb 20, 2023
Results posted
Mar 15, 2024
Last update
Mar 15, 2024

Study contacts

Linda Hanson, DC, MS
study director · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion