ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07926581Updated Nov 9, 2026

Study Designed to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Neurolyser XR After Marketing Approval

An observational study in Lumbar Zygapophyseal Pain, Low Back Pain and Facet Joint Pain; Low Back Pain, sponsored by FUSMobile Inc.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by FUSMobile Inc. · Observational

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Neurolyser XR demonstrated positive outcomes in the clinical studies prior to obtaining CE marking, and well as in multiple pilot trials performed globally. This Post-Market Clinical Follow-up study is required to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Neurolyser XR under real-world conditions.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center study to support the intended use of the Neurolyser XR from treatment of chronic low back pain. Following the study procedure, all participants will be followed through their 12 Month visit to evaluate safety and effectiveness. The study will be conducted in the European Union in up to 15 different physical locations, utilizing physician investigators who have purchased a Neurolyser XR system and have completed the Neurolsyer XR Training Program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Zygapophyseal Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Facet Joint Pain; Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • medial branch nerve ablation
  • high-intensity focused ultrasound
  • HIFU
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 481 observational studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

FUSMobile Inc. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients treated with the Neurolyser XR in a commercial setting will be invited to participate in this post-market study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of lumbar zygapophyseal pain and eligible for treatment with the Neurolyser XR according to standard clinical practice.
  2. Ability to understand the study requirements and provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in another interventional clinical study that may interfere with the outcomes of this study.
  2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Neurolyser XR

    Participants receiving treatment with the Neurolyser XR

    Device: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh Intensity Focused Ultrasound

    Use of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or ultrasound energy, to ablate the intended anatomical target.

    Also known as: lumbar zygapophyseal pain, nerve ablation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness Endpoint - Assessed by change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a 10-point scale (0 to 10) with 0=no pain to 10=worst pain

    Time frame: Up to 12 Months post procedure

  2. Effectiveness Endpoint - Assessed by change in Patient's Global Impression of Pain (PGIC)

    Patient's Global Impression of Pain (PGIC) is a 7-point scale; range from "very much improved" to "very much worse"

    Time frame: Up to 12 Months post procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness Endpoint - X-ray Dose

    Analysis of X-ray dose used during the procedure

    Time frame: Estimated procedure time is 20 to 60 minutes based on the number of locations treated.

  2. Effectiveness Endpoint - Procedure Time

    Analysis of time needed to complete the procedure.

    Time frame: Estimated procedure time is 20 to 60 minutes based on the number of locations.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Klinik Pm
    Alicante, 03015, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The overall study outcomes will be shared, although individual patient data will not be shared at this time.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 37 months later.

Of 185 observational studies under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 37 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 16, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 12, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07926581
Lead sponsor
FUSMobile Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 12, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion