CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04944108Updated Jan 18, 2022

LISA vs INSURE in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. A Manikin Study

An interventional study of LISA approach and Insure approach in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Preterm Birth and Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, sponsored by University Hospital Padova. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital Padova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Background: Although LISA offers some advantages in ventilation procedure and neonatal outcomes over INSURE, the use of a catheter during LISA may have some drawbacks such as the prolonged duration of the laryngoscopy needed to insert the device. This is likely to aggravate the invasiveness of the procedure, resulting in stressful consequences such as bradycardia, hypoxia and hemodynamic changes.

Objectives: i) time of device positioning, ii) success of the procedure of positioning the device, iii) participant's satisfaction.

Methods: This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Preterm Birth
  • Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Padova is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Level III NICU consultants and residents will be eligible to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclusion criteria for this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Surfactant administration with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) approach

    Participants will be randomized to administer surfactant in a preterm manikin by using the LISA approach (thin catheter)

    Procedure: LISA approach

  • Active comparator
    Surfactant administration with intubation (INSURE) approach

    Participants will be randomized to administer surfactant in a preterm manikin by using the INSURE approach (tracheal tube)

    Procedure: Insure approach

Interventions

  • ProcedureLISA approach

    Participants will be randomized to administer surfactant in a preterm manikin by using the LISA approach (thin catheter) or the INSURE approach (tracheal tube)

    Also known as: INSURE approach

  • ProcedureInsure approach

    Participants will be randomized to administer surfactant in a preterm manikin by using the INSURE approach (tracheal tube)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time of device positioning

    Time needed for the correct positioning of the device into the trachea (thin catheter or tracheal tube). In case of failure, total time will be the sum of time of all attempts.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success of the procedure at the first attempt

    It refers at the success of the device positioning during the first attempt

    Time frame: 1 minute

  2. Participant's satisfaction

    At the end of the procedure, all participants will be required to fill a 5-item questionnaire aimed to assess their perception on the procedure (Likert scale)

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  3. Number of attempts to insert the device in the trachea

    It refers to the number of attempts to insert the device in the trachea

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  4. Correct depth of the device in the trachea

    It refers to reaching the correct depth in the trachea as assessed by the external observer using a laryngoscope

    Time frame: 10 minutes

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Poliambulanza Breacia
    Brescia, Italy
  • University Hospital of Padova
    Padova, 35128, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cavallin F, Bua B, Pasta E, Savio F, Villani PE, Trevisanuto D. Device positioning with LISA vs. INSURE: a crossover randomized controlled manikin trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(26):10577-10583. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2134774. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PubMed 36261132 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04944108
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Padova
Responsible party
Daniele Trevisanuto (Associate Professor, University Hospital Padova) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2021
Start date
Dec 16, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 14, 2022
Completion
Jan 14, 2022
Last update
Jan 18, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion