ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06420115TARGETUpdated Mar 25, 2025

Can Needle Size Improve Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal MRI Target Prostate Biopsy Without Affecting Side Effects?

An interventional study of different needle size for prostate biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, sponsored by University Hospital Padova. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital Padova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
580
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Differences in terms of diagnostic capability and side effects related to the needle caliber used for prostate biopsy sampling in patients with suspected prostate cancer

Read the detailed description

To assess whether a larger caliber (16G) prostate biopsy needle increases the diagnostic capability of prostate neoplasia compared to a smaller caliber (18G) needle, while keeping perioperative complications constant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Keywords

  • pca
  • needle
  • 16 gauge
  • 18 gauge
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Padova is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (presence of elevated prostatic specific antigen and/or suspicious digital rectal examination);
  • Presence of at least one suspicious prostate lesion on MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System ≥ 3) according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System v2.1 performed before Magnetic Resonance Imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under active surveillance or with a previous diagnosis of prostate neoplasia prior to .
  • Previous radiotherapy to the prostate for neoplasia.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
580 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mpMRI target prostate biopsy with 16 gauge needle

    Device: different needle size for prostate biopsy

  • Experimental
    mpMRI target prostate biopsy with 18 gauge needle

    Device: different needle size for prostate biopsy

Interventions

  • Devicedifferent needle size for prostate biopsy

    MRI Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total number of random and fusion-target biopsies with presence of prostate cancer

    The primary outcome measure involves assessing the total number of biopsies, including both random and fusion-targeted approaches, that reveal the presence of prostate cancer.

    Time frame: When histological report available

  2. Number of random and fusion-target biopsies with clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology >=2)

    The primary outcome measure focuses on the number and the detection rates of random and fusion-target biopsies revealing clinically significant prostate cancer aof clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as ISUP \>=2) between 16-gauge and 18-gauge biopsy needles.

    Time frame: When histological report available

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neoplasia/core ratio for each random and fusion-target biopsy

    Neoplasia/core ratio, indicates the ratio of neoplastic tissue to healthy tissue within biopsy cores obtained through both 16 and 18 gauge biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis. By analyzing this ratio, investivators seek to identify differences in diagnosis across the two different sizes

    Time frame: When histological report available

  2. Intra- and perioperative pain with 18G and 16G needles assessed using visual analog scale (VAS)

    The validated pain questionnaire employed in this study is designed to comprehensively assess the intra- and perioperative pain (following 7 days) experienced by patients undergoing prostate biopsy procedures with 18G and 16G needles. The visual analog scales "VAS" is a standardized validated questionnaire, a horizontal line, where one end represents "1 - no pain" and the other end represents "10 - worst possible pain." Patients are asked to mark on the line the point that best represents the intensity of their pain.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Number of hospitalizations at 30 and 60 days post-procedure

    By tracking the number of hospitalizations occurring at both 30 and 60 days post-procedure among patients undergoing prostate biopsy within these specific time frames, researchers seek to assess the short-term post-procedural outcomes and potential complications associated with the biopsy procedure. These hospitalization data will provide information into the safety profile and healthcare utilization patterns following prostate biopsy, aiding in the optimization of patient care and risk management strategies.

    Time frame: 60 days from biopsy

  4. Number of intra- and perioperative complications associated with 18G and 16G needles

    Intraoperative complications refer to adverse events occurring during the biopsy procedure itself, while perioperative complications encompass those arising in the immediate post-procedural period. These complications may include but are not limited to bleeding, infection, urinary retention, and vasovagal reactions. By documenting these complications, investigators will evaluate the safety profile and potential risks associated with each needle gauge, thereby informing clinical decision-making and optimizing patient outcomes.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only if requested

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06420115
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Padova
Responsible party
FABIO ZATTONI (MD, Phd, University Hospital Padova) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 17, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 25, 2025

Study contacts

Fabio F. Zattoni, MD, PhD
Contact
fabio.zattoni@unipd.it
0498212730
Fabio Zattoni, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padova,

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion