ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06358248SPHEREUpdated Apr 16, 2024

Standardized Physician-modified Fenestrated Endograft Registry

An observational study in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal and Aortic Diseases, sponsored by University Hospital Padova. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-16.

Sponsored by University Hospital Padova · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multicenter retrospective study including all consecutive patients treated by PMEG using a standard modification technique of Valiant Captivia (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA).

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) without an adequate proximal neck length for safe sealing and fixation with a standard EVAR may benefit from complex endovascular repair. The most common are short neck AAA, juxta/para-renal AAA, and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA), where incorporation of renal and visceral vessels is required to obtain an adequate proximal sealing. Several endovascular options are available, with the most effective being represented by incorporation of target vessels by custom-made or off-the-shelf fenestrated/branched endografts.

Custom-made devices have shown excellent early and long-term outcomes, but due to manufacturing time (up to three months), they can be used only for elective cases. In urgent cases, readily available off-the-shelf devices can be used, but their anatomical feasibility is not exhaustive, and may require long segment of aortic coverage above the celiac trunk. Parallel aortic grafts with chimneys or periscopes have been proposed as a timely alternative; however, gutter endoleaks and lack of proximal sealing are serious concerns for these techniques, especially for those cases where more than two target vessels need to be incorporated.

In patients presenting with large aneurysm, symptomatic, or requiring urgent repair, the use of physician-modified endograft (PMEG) represents a valid option. It allows for a rapid customization of a standard abdominal or thoracic device with the creation of fenestrations, scallops or branches, based on patient aneurysm anatomical extent and target vessel position.

However, these techniques demand high level of skills and experience; a recent review showed also that in the literature there is an extreme variability on indication to treatment, type of aneurysm and extension, type of graft, and method of modification, thus limiting the possibility to adequately analyze outcomes or drive comparison between different techniques.

Here the investigators describe an initial experience on safety and feasibility of a standardized approach with PMEG, based on specific anatomical selection criteria, measurement method and a standard technique of modification, using the Valiant Captivia (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA) thoracic endograft.

BACKGROUND AND PRELIMINARY DATA

The vast majority of the literature on PMEG is based on the Cook platform. Recently Chait et al. reported the long term outcomes of more than 150 Cook PMEGs, with excellent results in terms of early mortality, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and target instability, especially for complex AAA compared to TAAA.

There is only a single experience using Valiant Captivia PMEG Valiant in the version without free-flow. In this experience the authors reported 18 cases; after complete unsheathing, the graft was introduced in a sterile aortic 3D model for precise fenestration allocation and then re-sheathed. The investigators think that leaving the graft on its device may reduce the risk of infection, reducing manipulation and contact with other materials, as the the printed aortic model. The other two case reports using the Valiant platform for the treatment of the paravisceral segment are from Gibello et al., that used a Valiant Navion graft, and Joseph et al., that applied mini-cuff-augmented fenestration using Valiant Captivia.

STANDARDIZED DEVICE MODIFICATION

The graft is modified on a sterile back-table in a hybrid operating room, while the patient is prepared for general anesthesia. A Valiant Captivia thoracic graft with free-flow (either with tubular or tapered shape) is fully deployed without releasing the free-flow, that is maintained retained on its tip. After that, a vertical dotted line is drawn to mark the graft anterior 0° degree, and fabric holes are performed with ophthalmologic cautery in the desired position, taking care of not having graft struts within the fenestrations. The fenestrations need to be nicely round, ideally 6x6 mm for the renals and 8x8 mm for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT), and are reinforced with the tip of a 0.018 guidewire (V-18, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts-USA) through a continuous 5-0 non-adsorbable locking suture (Ti-cron, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota-USA).

A posterior constraining wire is created to temporarily reduce the diameter of the graft by 20-30%, in order to allow partial rotation during the deployment phase. The back of a 0.018'' guidewire is routed on the posterior aspect of the graft passing within the external suture of the struts, thus not requiring fabric puncture; the prolene used to reduce the diameter are tied around the stent struts and subsequently looped to the posterior wire. The four "8" markers on the top of the graft are carefully removed with a scalpel; one of these is modified as an "S" and re-sutured on the anterior aspect at 0 degree position, with a 5-0 prolene continuous suture. This "S" marker will allow anteroposterior graft orientation. Finally, the graft is re-sheathed with help of vessel loop.

FOLLOW-UP

A postoperative CTA is required within 30 days. Further follow-up follow-up is left to each center, but ideally includes imaging follow-up at 6, 12, 24 months and yearly thereafter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal
  • Aortic Diseases

Keywords

  • Aortic Aneurysm
  • Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
  • Endovascular aortic repair
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 20 observational studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Padova is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients who underwent e PMEG with 4-fenestration procedure for the treatment of a short neck AAA, juxta/para-renal AAA, and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Complex AAA (including short-neck AAA, JRAA, PRAA, extent IV TAAA)
  • Haemodynamic stability
  • Anatomical feasibility is based on the presence of a proximal aortic neck above the mid celiac trunk of ≥25 mm in length and between 18 mm and 35 mm in diameter; the neck needs to be "healthy" with no parietal calcifications or thrombus with a cylindrical shape. The visceral aorta is required to be no larger than 40 mm in maximum diameter.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Extent I-III TAAA
  • Hemorrhagic shock
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients treated

    All patients treated with 4-fen PMEG endograft

    Device: Physician-modification of Valiant Captivia Endograft (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA).

Interventions

  • DevicePhysician-modification of Valiant Captivia Endograft (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN-USA).

    On a sterile back-table a Valiant Captivia thoracic graft is deployed. A dotted line is drawn to mark the graft anterior 0° degree, and fabric holes are performed with cautery in the desired position. The fenestrations need to be 6x6 mm for the renals and 8x8 mm for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT), and are reinforced with the tip of a 0.018 guidewire through a continuous 5-0 locking suture. A posterior constraining wire is created to reduce the diameter of the graft by 20-30%, in order to allow rotation during the deployment phase. The four "8" markers on the top of the graft are carefully removed with a scalpel; one of these is modified as an "S" and re-sutured on the anterior aspect at 0 degree position, with a 5-0 prolene continuous suture. This "S" marker will allow anteroposterior graft orientation. Finally, the graft is re-sheathed and deployed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical success

    Number of participants who underwent a successful deployment of the endograft and stenting of the 4 visceral vessels

    Time frame: Intra-operative

  2. Freedom from target vessel instability

    Number of participants who experience any occlusion, endoleak, aneurysm rupture, stent restenosis needing a re-intervention

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Freedom from endograft instability

    Number of participants who show absence of endoleak, aneurysm rupture, endograft migration

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early (30-days) Major Adverse Event (MAE)

    Any early (30-days) Major Adverse Event

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Aneurysm sac dynamics

    Number of participants who experience aneurysm sac diameter change during follow-up

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2028, 60 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2024
First posted
Apr 10, 2024
StartActual
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2033
Last update
Apr 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06358248
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Padova
Responsible party
Michele Piazza (Principal Investigator, University Hospital Padova) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2024

Study contacts

Michele Piazza, MD
Contact
michele.piazza@unipd.it
0498218154
Michele Piazza, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Padova

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion