CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04874051BALANCEUpdated Mar 22, 2023

Sensor-based Assessment and Rehabilitation of Balance in Neurological Diseases

An interventional study of Experimental Group and Control Group in Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson Disease, sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy. Status unknown at 5 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-22.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2019, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Balance impairment is one of the most common disorders due to a neurological diseases. Sensor-based technologies may be useful for falls prevention and balance recovery during patients hospitalization. OAK Elderly Care System (Khymeia Group, Noventa Padovana, Italy) allows the assessment of fall risk, the centre of pressure and the execution of balance exercises in a virtual environment.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to compare the therapy provided by means of the OAK Elderly Care System with conventional physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation in patients affected by stroke, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson Disease (PD).

OAK Elderly Care System consists of two independent balance boards and three sensors for the kinematic tracking of the trunk and lower limbs. These components allow the assessment of the centre of pressure and the execution of exercises in a virtual environment.

120 patients (40 stroke, 40 MS, 40 PK) hospitalized at 4 different italian hospitals, were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (i.e. intervention group, control group). Intervention group received 1 daily hour of technology-based treatment, while the control group underwent 1 daily hour of physiotherapy for balance rehabilitation, in addiction to 1 hour of conventional physiotherapy. Both treatments lasted 15 sessions. Before and after treatment balance, walking, daily living autonomy and pathology-specific features were assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Parkinson Disease

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Sensor-based rehabilitation
  • Virtual Reality
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,083 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 40 across 3,295 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Common criteria:

  • Berg Balance Scale \< 50/56;
  • Ability to maintain the standing position with o without one support for 1 minute;
  • Functional Independence measure \< 100/126;
  • Barthel Index \< 80/100.

Stroke:

  • Single ischemic stroke;
  • Lesion occured after 2 and within 18 months;
  • National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≤ 14.

Parkinson:

  • 1.5 \< Hoehn \& Yahr \< 3;
  • Subitem "freezing when walking"of the UPDRS ≤ 2.

Multiple Sclerosis:

  • Relapsing remitting or secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis;
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale ≤ 6.5.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated epilepsy;
  • Major depressive disorder;
  • Fractures;
  • Dementia;
  • Ideomotor Apraxia;
  • Neglect;
  • Severe impairment of verbal comprehension;
  • Severe acoustic and visual disorders.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group (EG)

    In the EG the subjects will perform balance exercises using the OAK system under the supervision of a trained physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week.

    Device: Experimental Group

  • Active comparator
    Control Group (CG)

    In the CG the subjects will be asked to perform conventional balance exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The treatment will last 3 weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, 5 times per week.

    Other: Control Group

Interventions

  • DeviceExperimental Group

    The experimental treatment will be provided by means of the OAK system. This device consists of 1 cabinet with 2 independent balance boards, 2 monitors (one for the physiotherapist and one for the patient) and 3 wireless IMUs (one for the left lower limb, one for the right lower limb and one for the trunk). The 2 balance boards provide body weight transfer exercises, while the wireless motion sensors provide one leg stance exercises or trunk exercises in a virtual environment.

  • OtherControl Group

    The Control Group will perform conventional balance exercises similar to the exercises provided with the OAK system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 56).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of falls during the last year

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions).

    Time frame: Change from baseline number of falls during the last year scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  2. Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 5).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Ambulation Classification at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  3. Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale (ABC)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Activities specific-Balance Confidence scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  4. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 126).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Independence Measure at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  5. Barthel Index (BI)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means better outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Barthel Index at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  6. National Institution of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 42).

    Time frame: Change from baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  7. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 147).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  8. Hoehn & Yahr Scale (H&Y)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 5).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Hoehn & Yahr Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

  9. Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 15 sessions). A higher score means worse outcome (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10).

    Time frame: Change from baseline Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

Other outcomes

  1. Instrumental assessment

    The OAK system will record the changes of the center of pressure during 30 seconds, with relaxed arms and eyes open.

    Time frame: Change from baseline BBS at the end of the therapy (three weeks thereafter)

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Fondazione Mondino
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
    Recruiting
  • IRCCS ICS Maugeri Spa SB
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
    Recruiting
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
    Rom, 00163, Italy
    Recruiting
  • IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia
    Rom, 00179, Italy
    Recruiting
  • San Camillo IRCCS
    Venice, 30126, Italy
    • Francesca Baldan · Sub investigator
    • Sara Federico · Sub investigator
    • Martina Pavanetto · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04874051
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
Collaborators
IRCCS San Raffaele, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA, IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 5, 2021
Start date
Sep 2, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 22, 2023

Study contacts

Andrea Turolla, PhD
Contact
andrea.turolla@ospedalesancamillo.net
00390412207 ext. 531
Andrea Turolla, PhD
principal investigator · San Camillo IRCCS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion