CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04534777M-Neuro-DoCUpdated Feb 5, 2024

Multimodal Neuroprognostication in Disorders of Consciousness

An observational study in Consciousness Disorder, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-05.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2020; still recruiting 6 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Disorders of consciousness frequently occur at the acute phase of brain injuries. For the most severe cases, consciousness impairment can be prolonged. To optimize the medical plan and the goal of care, it is fundamental to have precise tools to predict chances of recovery of consciousness and potential disability. Currently, multimodal assessment including behavioral, neurophysiological and neuroimaging technics is recommended. However, the respective predictive values of these markers are poorly understood and decision making is challenging when results are contradictory

Read the detailed description

Improved treatment of critically ill patients has resulted in increased patients' survival rates in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This is particularly true for brain injury such as traumatic brain injuries, cerebral hemorrhages or cardiac arrest. While some of these patients regain consciousness after a transient state known as coma, other will develop a prolonged disorder of consciousness (DoC) such as chronic unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (also known as vegetative state) or minimally conscious state, or will remain severely disabled. Consciousness diagnosis and prediction of recovery in DoC currently relies on standardized behavioral assessment and disease-specific markers. However, this strategy may fail to detect covert consciousness due to major sensory and motor deficits. Moreover, the DoC etiology and pathophysiology are heterogenous and most likely result from the combination of factors whose interplay still needs to be clarified. Consciousness detection in DoC is of great importance in term of medical management (e.g., pain management, communication), prognosis (e.g., orientation to adapted rehabilitation center to maximize chance of recovery) and end-of-life discussions (e.g., withholding and/or withdrawing of life support discussion). Furthermore, taking care of these patients can be very stressful due to the high levels of uncertainty associated to their potential of recovery. For all these reasons it is critical to develop personalized diagnosis and prognosis assessment tools that can allow better decisions.

The M-NeuroDoC study will take advantage from the state-of-the-art multimodal assessment ongoing at our institution for both acute and chronic patients in order to improve recovery prediction.

Indeed, our multimodal assessment practice constitutes a great and unique opportunity to better understand the respective diagnostic and prognostic accuracy performances of markers such as behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging that are routinely performed at our institution.

The overall outcome of this project will allow to draw better single-patient predictions of state, prognosis, and rehabilitation strategies and furthermore, a better understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms behind DoC that could result in groundbreaking new personalized therapeutic approaches.

Based on the collected data, we will evaluate the respective diagnostic accuracy of all the markers acquired in clinical practice regarding the clinical outcome at 2 years.

Data of interest will be:

  • repeated neurological assessments
  • repeated behavioural assessments suing validated tools:
  • neurophysiological explorations
  • conventional brain imagery (CT, IRM)
  • quantitative brain imagery
  • functional brain imagery , mental imagery
02

Conditions studied

  • Consciousness Disorder

Keywords

  • electroencephalography
  • evoked potentials
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • minimally conscious state
  • positron emission tomography
  • resting state fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging )
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • traumatic brain injury
  • unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
  • vegetative state
  • polysomnography
03

In context

Consciousness Disorders

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Consciousness Disorders; 102 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 79 across 86 observational studies indexed under Consciousness Disorders.

Browse Consciousness Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with consciousness disorder (acute sub-acute or chronic for which our expertise is requested to better characterize the diagnostic and prognosis of recovery) or with Brain injuries on CT or MRI

Inclusion criteria

  1. Consciousness disorder (acute sub-acute or chronic for which our expertise is requested to better characterize the diagnostic and prognosis of recovery)
  2. Brain injuries on CT or MRI (e.g. TBI) (traumatic brain-injured ), anoxia or stroke related lesions, etc...)
  3. Age between 18 and 80 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Deep sedation (e.g. elevated ICP(intracranial pressure ), refractory status epilepticus)
  2. Sever known neurodegenerative disease (e.g. Alzheimer disease)
  3. Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Consciousness disorder patients

    The overall outcome of this project will allow to draw better single-patient predictions of state, prognosis, and rehabilitation strategies and furthermore, a better understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms behind DoC that could result in groundbreaking new personalized therapeutic approaches. Based on the collected data, we will evaluate the respective diagnostic accuracy of all the markers acquired in clinical practice regarding the clinical outcome at 2 years.

    Other: repeated neurological, behavioral assessments and conventional, quantitative and functional brain imagery

Interventions

  • Otherrepeated neurological, behavioral assessments and conventional, quantitative and functional brain imagery

    Based on the collected data, we will evaluate the respective diagnostic accuracy of all the markers acquired in clinical practice regarding the clinical outcome at 2 years.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. prognosis accuracy of respective predictive markers of consciousness recovery

    Calculation of the value (Chi2 tests, specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of each tests and of their combinations to distinguish patients states and outcome (24-month GOS-E ≥ 4 or \< 4).

    Time frame: 24 MONTHS

Secondary outcomes

  1. GOS-E Glasgow outcome scale - Extended

    Evolution of GOS-E (Glasgow outcome scale - Extended) scale from category 1 ==\> Death to category 8: good recovery upper ==\>no current problems related to the brain injury that affect daily life

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière
    Paris, 75013, France
    • Benjamin ROHAUT, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Giacino JT, Kalmar K. Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3-4):166-74. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000498. PubMed 16350959 ↗
  • Hermann B, Goudard G, Courcoux K, Valente M, Labat S, Despois L, Bourmaleau J, Richard-Gilis L, Faugeras F, Demeret S, Sitt JD, Naccache L, Rohaut B; Pitie-Salpetriere hospital Neuro-ICU. Wisdom of the caregivers: pooling individual subjective reports to diagnose states of consciousness in brain-injured patients, a monocentric prospective study. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e026211. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026211. PubMed 30792234 ↗
  • Andre-Obadia N, Zyss J, Gavaret M, Lefaucheur JP, Azabou E, Boulogne S, Guerit JM, McGonigal A, Merle P, Mutschler V, Naccache L, Sabourdy C, Trebuchon A, Tyvaert L, Vercueil L, Rohaut B, Delval A. Recommendations for the use of electroencephalography and evoked potentials in comatose patients. Neurophysiol Clin. 2018 Jun;48(3):143-169. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 May 18. PubMed 29784540 ↗
  • Balanca B, Dailler F, Boulogne S, Ritzenthaler T, Gobert F, Rheims S, Andre-Obadia N. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EEG to detect delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A preliminary study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep;129(9):1926-1936. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jul 5. PubMed 30007892 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04534777
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2020
Start date
Sep 9, 2020
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 5, 2024

Study contacts

Benjamin ROHAUT, MD
Contact
benjamin.rohaut@aphp.fr
184827888 ext. +33
Lionel NACCACHE, PUPH
Contact
lionel.naccache@aphp.fr
157274314 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion