ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04080440BiperUpdated Sep 24, 2025

Brain-injured Patients Extubation Readiness Study

An interventional study of Extubation readiness clinical score and Usual Care in Mechanical Ventilator Weaning, Acute Brain Injury and Altered Level of Consciousness, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Recruiting at 21 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-24.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2020; still recruiting 6 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
660
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The BIPER study is a stepped wedge cluster randomised clinical trial aiming to decrease extubation failure in critically-ill brain-injured patients with residual impaired consciousness using a simple clinical score.

Read the detailed description

Severe brain-injured patients need mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation. After treatment of the acute neurological condition, weaning of the mechanical ventilation has to be initiated notably to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia and others complications. Nevertheless, extubation failure is very common in this population due to residual neurological impairment with airway control alteration.

Guidelines about weaning of mechanical ventilation and extubation exclude brain-injured patients with a residual impaired consciousness.

In 2017, a simple and pragmatic extubation readiness clinical score was validated in a prospective observational cohort study of 140 brain injured patients. (Godet et al. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):104-114) In this study, brain injured patients with residual impaired consciousness who succeeded a spontaneous breathing trial were extubated. In multivariate analysis, 4 clinical elements were associated with extubation success. A prediction score was determined using the odds ratio such as followed :

  1. Deglutition: 3 points if present
  2. Gag reflex: 4 points if present
  3. Cough: 4 points if present
  4. CRS-R Score, visual item >2, 3 points if present, 1 point if not

For a cut-off value of 9, extubation failure could be predicted with a sensibility of 84%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 89% and a negative predictive value of 66%.

In order to participate, brain-injured patients will have to succeed a spontaneous breathing trial and meet all inclusion criteria, including not being able to obey to command with no or minimal sedation. Using a stepped wedge randomisation process with intensive care units as clusters, patients will be weaned and extubated under usual care or using the extubation readiness clinical score.

The authors' hypothesis is that this clinical score will allow physicians to extubate patients at the right time interval and prevent extubation failure in this frail population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilator Weaning
  • Acute Brain Injury
  • Altered Level of Consciousness
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Airway Control

Keywords

  • Coma
  • Intensive care units
  • Critical care
  • Stroke
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Anoxic ischemic encephalopathy
  • Glasgow coma scale
03

In context

Brain Injuries

946 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 660 is above the median of 41 across 612 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 859 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute cerebral lesion with a Glasgow Coma Scale \<13 needing admission in ICU and mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation for neurological cause : cerebrovascular stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic including aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, anoxo ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest or brain tumour
  • Mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours
  • 18 to 75 years old
  • Neurological stability with no intracranial hypertension with minimal sedation
  • Glasgow Coma Scale motor response \< 6
  • Spontaneous breathing trial succeeded
  • First extubation attempt

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Posterior cranial fossa lesion
  • Admission for status epilepticus or central nervous system infection
  • Spinal cord injury (tetraplegia or paraplegia)
  • Uncontrolled status epilepticus or uncontrolled central nervous system infection
  • Care limitation plan
  • Chronic respiratory failure defined as ambulatory oxygen therapy or pressure support ventilation and/or proven and/or ambulatory non-invasive CPAP therapy for sleep apnoea syndrome
  • More than 3 failed spontaneous breathing trials
  • Significant chest trauma (more than 2 broken ribs / broken sternum / with an indication of open thoracic surgery)
  • Surgery planned within 7 days
  • Tracheotomy or previous extubation outside of the protocol
  • Previous compromised upper airway permeability
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Adult under the protection of the law or without social assurance system
  • Inclusion in another clinical study about mechanical ventilation or weaning
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
660 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual care

    Clinicians decide whether to extubate or not following usual care in their ICU ventilator weaning protocol

    Procedure: Usual Care

  • Experimental
    Extubation readiness clinical score

    Clinicians decide whether to extubate or not following the extubation readiness clinical score as part of their ICU ventilator weaning protocol

    Procedure: Extubation readiness clinical score

Interventions

  • ProcedureExtubation readiness clinical score

    After treatment of the acute neurological condition, eligibility for a spontaneous breathing trial will be assessed once a day. In the intervention group, after a successful spontaneous breathing trial in unconscious patients, the score will be evaluated. If the score is \> 9, extubation has to be completed.

  • ProcedureUsual Care

    After treatment of the acute neurological condition, eligibility for a spontaneous breathing trial will be assessed once a day. In the control group, after a successful spontaneous breathing trial in unconscious patients, the extubation will be achieved according to usual care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extubation failure

    Extubation failure is defined as a need of reintubation or death in the 5 days (120 hours) following extubation

    Time frame: From extubation to Day 5 (120 hours) after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Key secondary outcome measure: time to effective extubation

    Time from SBT success (enrollment) to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation, defined as the time point at which a patient is alive and free of invasive ventilatory support for more than 5 days (120 hours)

    Time frame: From enrollment to day 5 (120 hours) after extubation

  2. Invasive mechanical ventilation duration

    Period expressed in days during which patients will need invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From admission to the end of ICU Stay

  3. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation duration

    Period expressed in days during which patients will need non-invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From admission to the end of ICU Stay

  4. Reintubation rate in the first 48 hours

    Patients needing reintubation during the first 48h post-extubation

    Time frame: From extubation to Day 2 after extubation (48 hours)

  5. Reintubation rate in ICU

    Patients needing reintubation during entire ICU stay

    Time frame: From extubation to the end of ICU Stay

  6. Post extubation nosocomial pneumonia

    Post extubation nosocomial pneumonia is defined as a pulmonary infection after extubation that necessitate antibiotic therapy

    Time frame: From extubation to the end of ICU stay

  7. Tracheotomy after extubation

    Number of patients that necessitate a tracheotomy after extubation failure

    Time frame: From extubation to the end of ICU Stay

  8. Tracheotomy before extubation

    Number of patients that necessitate a tracheotomy after a successful spontaneous breathing trial but before any extubation

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of ICU Stay

  9. ICU length of stay

    ICU length of stay expressed in days

    Time frame: From admission to the end of ICU Stay

  10. Hospital length of stay

    Hospital length of stay expressed in days

    Time frame: From admission to the end of Hospital Stay

  11. Mortality in ICU

    Deceased patient in each group during ICU stay

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the ICU Stay

  12. Mortality at day 28

    Deceased patient in each group at day 28

    Time frame: From enrollment to Day 28

  13. Mortality at day 90

    Deceased patient in each group at day 90

    Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90

  14. Neurological outcome

    Neurological outcome using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended

    Time frame: Day 90 after enrollment

07

Study locations

14 of 21 sites recruiting
  • CHU
    Angers, France
    Recruiting
    • Sigismond Lasocki · Contact
  • CHU
    Bordeaux, France
    Recruiting
    • Laurent Petit · Contact
  • CHU
    Bordeaux, France
    Recruiting
    • Hugues De Courson · Contact
  • CH
    Bourg-en-Bresse, France
    Terminated

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • CHU
    Caen, France
    Recruiting
    • Clément Gakuba · Contact
  • CHU
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Recruiting
    • Russell Chabanne · Contact
  • CHU
    Grenoble, France
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • CHU
    La Réunion, France
    Recruiting
    • Sophie Kauffmann · Contact
  • CHU
    Lille, France
    Recruiting
    • Natalie De Sa · Contact
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, France
    Recruiting
    • Florent Gobert · Contact
  • APHM
    Marseille, France
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • CHU
    Montpellier, France
    Recruiting
    • Pierre-François Perrigault · Contact
  • CHU
    Nantes, France
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Pasteur 2 Hospital - University Hospital
    Nice, France
    Terminated

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • CHU
    Nîmes, France
    Recruiting
    • Claire Roger · Contact
  • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
    • Nicolas Engrand · Contact
  • CHU
    Poitiers, France
    Recruiting
    • Claire Dahyot-Fizelier · Contact
  • CHU
    Rennes, France
    Recruiting
    • Yoann Launey · Contact
  • CHU
    Saint-Etienne, France
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • CHU
    Toulouse, France
    Recruiting
    • Thomas Geeraerts · Contact
  • CH
    Valence, France
    Terminated

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Godet T, Chabanne R, Marin J, Kauffmann S, Futier E, Pereira B, Constantin JM. Extubation Failure in Brain-injured Patients: Risk Factors and Development of a Prediction Score in a Preliminary Prospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):104-114. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001379. PubMed 27749290 ↗
  • Chabanne R, Godet T, Andanson B, Borrel P, Astier L, Caumon E, Bourguignon N, Laclautre L, Morand D, De Jong A, Futier E, Constantin JM, Pereira B, Jabaudon M. Prevention of extubation failure in neurocritical care patients with residual disorder of consciousness: the Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e104897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104897. PubMed 40659406 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data sharing plan : BIPER clinical trial data will be made available upon reasonable request as soon as study publication with deidentified participant data and statistical/analytic code

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: As soon as study publication in a peer review journal with a 5 years limit.

Access criteria: Data will be made available on reasonable demand by emailing the coordinating clinical investigator of the trial. A proposal that describes planned analyses will have to be submitted and a data sharing agreement signed. Requests will be evaluated by the coordinating clinical investigator and study statistician of the trial.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 84 months after the start.

Of 284 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Brain Injuries, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 84 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 297 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2019
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
StartActual
Feb 9, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Feb 13, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 13, 2027
Last update
Sep 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04080440
Collaborators
ANARLF Network, Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soin (DGOS)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
Start date
Feb 9, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 13, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2025

Study contacts

Lise Laclautre
Contact
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
+33 4 73 754963
Russell Chabanne
study director · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Olivier Vincent
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble
Florent Gobert
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon
Jérôme Morel
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Matthieu Jeannot
principal investigator · CH VALENCE
Pierre-André Rodié-Talbère
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital
Thomas Geeraerts
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse
Pierre-François Perrigault
principal investigator · University Hospital, Montpellier
Claire Roger
principal investigator · CHU Nîmes
Carole Ichai
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Nicolas Engrand
principal investigator · Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Camille Bouisse
principal investigator · CH de Bourg-en-Bresse
Natalie De Sa
principal investigator · CHU Lille
Sigismond Lasocki
principal investigator · University Hospital, Angers
Claire Dahyot-Fizelier
principal investigator · CHU Poitiers
Yoann Launey
principal investigator · Rennes University Hospital
Laurent Petit
principal investigator · CHU Bordeaux - Réanimation Chirurgicale et traumatologique
Hugues De Courson
principal investigator · CHU Bordeaux - Réanimation Neurologique
Clément Gakuba
principal investigator · CHU Caen Normandie
Sophie Kauffmann
principal investigator · CHU de La Réunion

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion