ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07201311DIMREATOXUpdated Jul 6, 2026

Combined Gastrointestinal Decontamination in Acute Severe Poisoning

A Phase 2 interventional study of Combination of activated charcoal with polyethylene glycol for digestive decontamination and Standard Treatment (Guideline-Based) in Severe Poisoning With Cardiotropic or Psychotropic Drug and Admission to Intensive Care, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gastrointestinal absorption of high dose medication (toxicant) ingested under solid form for suicidal purposes, is prolonged in patients who need intensive care admission and mechanical ventilation. This is due to the large ingested amounts, slowed blood circulation in the digestive system due to low blood pressure, and the formation of conglomerates of pills (pharmacobezoars).

We make the hypothesis that combined decontamination of the digestive system with activated charcoal plus polyethylene glycol may reduce absorption of the ingested toxicant compared with standard care.

Two hundred patients requiring admission to intensive care and mechanical ventilation due to the effect of the ingested toxicant, will be included in a 1:1 randomized fashion over 24 months in the intervention group receiving combined decontamination and standard care group receiving activated charcoal according to guidelines.

The main objective is to show a decrease in the concentration of the toxicant after 24h of randomization.

Read the detailed description

Rationale - digestive absorption of toxic substances ingested in solid form is prolonged in severely intoxicated patients admitted to intensive care and requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. This prolonged absorption is favoured by the large quantity of tablets/pills ingested, the formation of pharmacobezoars, delayed formulations, co-ingestion of transit slowing agents (such as substances with an anticholinergic effect) and mesenteric hypoperfusion in the event of hypotension slowing absorption.

Digestive decontamination with activated charcoal combined with intestinal purging with polyethylene glycol (PEG) appears to be effective in pharmacokinetic studies, but its benefits have never been studied in intoxicated patients, particularly after admission to intensive care. Digestive decontamination using activated charcoal and polyethylene glycol could reduce toxic concentrations at 24 hours compared with the standard treatment group.

Main objective: To show the greatest reduction in the plasma concentration of the toxicant(s) (ingested parent molecules) at H24 of randomisation in the intervention group receiving activated charcoal + intestinal purge compared with the control group.

primary endpoint: Percentage change in the plasma concentration of the toxic substance(s) (ingested parent molecules) at 24 hours compared with its/their value(s) at randomisation.

Secondary objectives:

  • To show the greater reduction in the plasma concentration of the toxic substance(s) (ingested parent molecules) at H48, H72 and H96 of randomisation in the intervention group compared with the control group;
  • To demonstrate a reduction in the number of days of mechanical ventilation and the length of time spent in intensive care in the intervention group compared with the control group;
  • To demonstrate the good tolerance of treatment by digestive decontamination in the intervention group.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Percentage change in plasma concentration of toxicant(s) (ingested parent molecules) at H48, H72 and H96 compared with the value at randomisation
  • Area under the concentration curve up to the 96th hour expressed as a percentage of the concentration at randomisation
  • Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation for 28 days post-randomisation
  • Number of days alive without resuscitation for 28 days post-randomisation
  • Number of episodes of vomiting
  • Number of ventilator-associated pneumonias
  • Number of episodes of upper abdominal pain and diarrhoea;
  • Presence of hypersensitivity reactions such as anaphylactic shock, angioedema, urticaria, rash and pruritus.
02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Poisoning With Cardiotropic or Psychotropic Drug
  • Admission to Intensive Care

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Poisoning
  • Cardiotropic drugs
  • Psychotropic drugs
  • Activated charcoal
  • Polyethylene glycol
03

In context

Poisoning

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Poisoning; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 46 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Poisoning.

Browse Poisoning studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient aged ≥18, intoxicated and hospitalised in intensive care AND

  • Main drug toxicant of functional type (any psychotropic or cardiotropic), adsorbable by activated charcoal And
  • Main toxicant identified by the history taken by a healthcare professional on the ward or during care prior to the ward And
  • Main toxicant identified within 3 hours of admission if the patient is already intubated on admission, or within 3 hours of intubation if the patient is intubated on the ward AND
  • Patient intubated for effects attributed to the toxic agent (neuro-respiratory or haemodynamic failure) AND
  • Patient with nasogastric tube or planned nasogastric tube and no AND
  • Main toxicant whose assay can be performed by the toxicology laboratory at Lariboisière Hospital AND Inclusion according to the emergency clause
  • Written from a parent/relative/trusted person. In the absence of a parent/relative/trusted person, the patient may be included under the emergency procedure and consent will be obtained as soon as possible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No social security affiliation
  • Non-intubated patient
  • to the administration of one of the study products (e.g. suspected digestive perforation, intestinal obstruction, inflammatory bowel disease, etc.)
  • Inability to insert a nasogastric tube
  • Repeated vomiting prior to inclusion, making digestive decontamination impossible
  • Digestive haemorrhage in progress or during the previous month
  • Ingestion of metals (e.g. iron, caesium, thallium, lead, copper, cadmium)
  • Isolated or predominant alcohol poisoning (e.g. ethyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, methanol)
  • Intoxication by gas (e.g. carbon monoxide or fire fumes)
  • Intoxication by a caustic product (acids or bases)
  • Main toxicant ingested under liquid form
  • Intoxication by a toxic lesion
  • Intoxication by a non-medicated product (e.g. party drugs)
  • Intubation for causes not attributed to the ingested toxic substance (e.g. massive inhalation pneumonia)
  • In-body carrier of drug pellets
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
  • Patients being treated for dementia
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients under legal protection
  • Patients deprived of their liberty
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined gastrointestinal decontamination

    Patients receive activated charcoal and polyethylene glycol

    Drug: Combination of activated charcoal with polyethylene glycol for digestive decontamination

  • Active comparator
    Control - standard treatment group

    Patients receive activated charcoal according to French guidelines

    Drug: Standard Treatment (Guideline-Based)

Interventions

  • DrugCombination of activated charcoal with polyethylene glycol for digestive decontamination

    A dose of 25-100g of activated charcoal via the nasogastric tube will be administered, followed by polyethylene glycol1L/15-20 kg ideal body weight at a flow rate of 1L/hour. polyethylene glycol will be continued until clear stools are obtained, a maximum of 24h of treatment of until the maximum dose of 1L per 15 kg of ideal body weight are administered. Serial activated charcoal 50g 6 times/day will be administered if prolonged-release forms or drugs with enterohepatic circulation were ingested.

  • DrugStandard Treatment (Guideline-Based)

    Patients receive activated charcoal according to French guidelines - activated charcoal 25-100g and serial activated charcoal 50g 6 times/day if sustained-release forms or drugs with enterohepatic circulation as routine treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage change in the plasma concentration of the toxic substance

    The primary endpoint is the percentage change in the plasma concentration of the toxic substance at 24 hours compared with the value at randomization. The percentage variation is calculated as 100 x (Concentration at 24 hours post-randomization-Concentration at randomization)/ Concentration at randomization

    Time frame: 24 hours post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage change in plasma concentration of toxicant

    The percentage variation is calculated as: At 48 hours : 100 x (Concentration at 48 hours post-randomization-Concentration at randomization)/ Concentration at randomization At 72 hours : 100 x (Concentration at 48 hours post-randomization-Concentration at randomization)/ Concentration at randomization At 96 hours : 100 x (Concentration at 48 hours post-randomization-Concentration at randomization)/ Concentration at randomization

    Time frame: 48, 72 and 96 hours post-randomization

  2. Area under the concentration curve up to the 96 th hour expressed as a percentage of the concentration at randomization

    All concentrations up to the 96th hour post-randomization will be used to generate the area under the curve, and this will be reported as percentage of the concentration at randomization

    Time frame: 96 hours post-randomization

  3. Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation for 28 days post-randomization

    Patients who leave the hospital after extubation and before the 28th day of randomization will be considered as being free of mechanical ventilation from extubation to the 28th day post randomization

    Time frame: 28 days post randomization

  4. Number of days alive out of critical care for 28 days post-randomization

    This will be defined as the interval from the moment the patient is ready to leave the intensive care until the 28th day of randomization. This will avoid lengthening the theoretical duration of ICU stay due to lack of ward beds

    Time frame: 28 days post randomization

  5. The number of vomiting episodes

    The polyethylene glycol and activated charcoal may induce vomiting, therefore the number of vomiting episodes will be recorded and compared between groups

    Time frame: through the study complétion, an average of 7 days

  6. Number of ventilator-associated pneumonias

    Number of pneumonias occurring through the study completion, an average of 7 days

    Time frame: through the study complétion, an average of 7 days

  7. Number of episodes of upper abdominal pain

    Polyethyleneglycol may cause upper abdominal pain, therefore the number of upper abdominal pain episodes will be recorded and compared between groups

    Time frame: through the study complétion, an average of 7 days

  8. Number of episodes of diarrhoea

    Diarrhea is a therapeutic effect of the polyethylene glycol, therefore the number of diarrhea episodes will be recorded and compared between groups

    Time frame: through the study complétion, an average of 7 days

  9. Presence of hypersensitivity reactions

    Polyethylene glycol may cause allergic reactions such as anaphylactic shock, angioedema, urticaria, rash and pruritus, therefore the presence of allergic reactions will be recorded and compared between groups

    Time frame: through the study complétion, an average of 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Sebastian Voicu
    Paris, 75010, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07201311
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Jun 24, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 24, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Study contacts

Voicu Sebastian, MD
Contact
sebastian.voicu@aphp.fr
0149958442 ext. +33
Megarbane Bruno, Professor
Contact
bruno.megarbane@aphp.fr
0149958442 ext. +33
Voicu Sebastian, MD
principal investigator · APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion