CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04319666Updated Mar 24, 2020

Intravascular Balloon Lithotripsy in Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

An interventional study of Left main stenting with intravascular lithotripsy in Coronary Artery Calcification and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by St George's, University of London. Status unknown at 6 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-24.

Sponsored by St George's, University of London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The IVL Left Main study is a prospective non-randomised pilot study to investigate the mechanical and procedural outcomes and safety of distal left main stenting with coronary lithotripsy in addition to standard techniques in patients with calcific left main disease and a clinical indication for revascularisation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Calcification
  • Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Atherosclerosis
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

St George's, University of London is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Unprotected distal LM (or equivalent) disease defined as:

    1. >70% diameter stenosis (DS) on angiography in the distal LM; or
    2. ≥50% DS in the distal LM with a) non-invasive evidence of ischaemia referable to a hemodynamically significant left main lesion, and/or b) FFR ≤0.80; or
    3. >70% diameter stenosis in either the ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex (LCX) that is within 10 mm of the ostium and requires stenting back into the LM (distal LM equivalent); or
    4. >50% diameter stenosis in either the ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex (LCX) that is within 10 mm of the ostium and requires stenting back into the LM (distal LM equivalent) with a) non-invasive evidence of ischaemia referable to its myocardial territory and/or b) FFR ≤0.80
  • Clinical indication for revascularisation by PCI
  • Viability of the treatment vessel as determined by echocardiography, cardiac MRI or other equivalent imaging modality.
  • ≥ 270° arc of calcification within at least one stenotic segment demonstrated on intravascular imaging.
  • Ability to pass a 0.014" guide wire across the lesion.
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures, including follow-up at 30 days.
  • Lesions not related to the distal LM requiring PCI can be treated:

    1. at the time of the study procedure if completed prior to distal LM PCI and the procedure was successful and uncomplicated (defined as a final lesion angiographic diameter stenosis \<30% and TIMI 3 flow (visually assessed) for all non-target lesions and vessels without perforation, cardiac arrest or need for defibrillation or cardioversion or hypotension/heart failure requiring mechanical or intravenous hemodynamic support or intubation. In situations where the distal LM lesion is critical, the LM can be ballooned or treated first so long as the study protocol is not deviated.
    2. as a staged procedure either within the same hospital admission or within 30 days. Any staged procedure must be declared at the index procedure otherwise it will be recorded as an event.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint.
  • Daughter vessel reference diameter \< 2.5 mm.
  • Use of rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloon, or any investigational device.
  • Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target lesion.
  • Prior PCI of the LM or PCI of the proximal LAD or proximal LCX within 10 mm of the ostium.
  • Prior coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery.
  • Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the LM, proximal LAD or proximal LCX.
  • Untreated pre-procedural haemoglobin \< 8 g/dL.
  • Renal failure with serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL and not on chronic dialysis.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as a HbA1c >10%.
  • Coagulopathy manifested by platelet count \< 50,000/ mL or International Normalized ratio (INR) > 1.7 (INR is only required in patients who have taken warfarin within 2 weeks of enrolment).
  • Cardiogenic shock.
  • Ongoing ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months.
  • NYHA class IV heart failure or LVEF \< 20%.
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 6 months.
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Visible thrombus (by angiography) at target lesion site.
  • Patient has active systemic infection on the day of the index procedure with either fever or requiring intravenous antibiotics.
  • Patient has vascular connective tissue disease (e.g. Marfan's syndrome).
  • Patient has a hypercoagulable disorder.
  • Patient has allergy to imaging contrast media for which they cannot be pre-medicated.
  • Allergy to Aspirin.
  • Allergy to Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor and Prasugrel.
  • Allergy to any component of the drug eluting stent that is planned for use.
  • Patient has any other severe comorbidity that is felt to preclude enrolment by the investigator.
  • Subject is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrolment).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PCI to left main with IVL

    Device: Left main stenting with intravascular lithotripsy

Interventions

  • DeviceLeft main stenting with intravascular lithotripsy

    Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) will be used to modify coronary artery calcification prior to stent implantation in left main coronary disease. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be used pre and post IVL and post stenting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary effectiveness endpoint 1

    Mean MSA (mm2) by segment for segments with obstructive disease and ≥ 270 degrees calcification.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  2. Primary effectiveness endpoint 2

    Incidence of residual area stenosis \<50% by segment for segments with obstructive disease and ≥ 270 degrees calcification.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  3. Primary safety endpoint

    Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days MACE consists of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minimum stent diameter (MSD) (mm) for segments with obstructive disease and ≥ 270 degrees calcification

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  2. Stent symmetry ratio for segments with obstructive disease and ≥ 270 degrees calcification

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  3. Stent expansion index (%) for segments with obstructive disease and ≥ 270 degrees calcification

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  4. MSA (mm2) for all segments.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  5. MSD (mm) for all segments.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  6. Stent symmetry ratio for all segments.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  7. Stent expansion (%) for all segments.

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  8. Device crossing success

    ARC-2 criteria

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  9. Angiographic success

    ARC-2 criteria

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  10. Procedural success

    ARC-2 criteria

    Time frame: Time of procedure

  11. Serious angiographic complications

    ARC-2 criteria. Composite of loss of major vessel/side branch, embolisation, disruption of collateral flow, persistent slow-flow or no reflow, major dissection, new regional wall motion abnormality, imaging evidence of loss of viable myocardium.

    Time frame: 24-48 hours

  12. MACE at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Individual components of MACE at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Individual components of MACE at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina status at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  16. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina status at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Stroke at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  18. Stroke at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Target lesion failure (TLF) at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  20. Target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Target vessel failure (TVF) at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  22. Target vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  23. All-cause mortality

    Stratified by i) cardiac death ii) non-cardiac death

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Peri-procedural myocardial infarction

    ARC-2 criteria

    Time frame: 48 hours

  25. Spontaneous myocardial infarction

    ARC-2 criteria

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Ischaemic-driven revascularisation

    Time frame: 12 months

  27. All revascularisation

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Angiographic and intracoronary imaging predictors of mechanical and procedural outcomes

    Time frame: 12 months

  29. Correlation between CK-MB and/or troponin levels post-PCI and outcomes at 30-days and 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Belfast Health & Social Care Trust
    Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • Golden Jubilee Hospital
    Clydebank, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
    Bristol, United Kingdom
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04319666
Lead sponsor
St George's, University of London
Collaborators
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Shockwave Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2020
Start date
May 1, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 24, 2020

Study contacts

Claudia Cosgrove
Contact
Claudia.Cosgrove@nhs.net
02087252807
Giovanna Bonato
Contact
gbonato@sgul.ac.uk
02087252807
James Spratt
principal investigator · St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion