ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04936620DISCUSUpdated Jul 6, 2026

Duroplasty for Injured Cervical Spinal Cord With Uncontrolled Swelling

An interventional study of Duroplasty and Spinal surgery in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by St George's, University of London. Recruiting at 34 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by St George's, University of London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2021; still recruiting 5 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
222
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

QUESTION. Does duroplasty improve outcome after spinal cord injury?

WHAT DO WE STUDY? We will investigate whether performing a surgical procedure called duroplasty improves outcomes after spinal cord injury.

WHY SPINAL CORD INJURY? Spinal cord injury is a devastating condition that causes permanent disability such as paralysis, numbness and loss of bladder and bowel control. Currently, there are no treatments shown to improve outcome after spinal cord injury.

WHAT IS DUROPLASTY? Duroplasty is an operation that involves opening the tough membrane around the cord, called the dura, and stitching a patch of artificial dura to expand the space around the swollen cord.

WHY IS DUROPLASTY BEING STUDIED? Based on our preliminary evidence, we think that the dura causes cord pressure after injury. We have shown in a small study of patients that performing this operation safely and effectively reduces pressure on the injured cord.

WHO IS ELIGIBLE? Adult patients with severe spinal cord injuries in the neck who will have surgery within 72 hours.

WHAT TREATMENT? Those who agree to take part will be allocated by chance (like tossing a coin) to standard treatment or standard treatment plus duroplasty. Some patients will also be asked to take part in a smaller study that involves placing probes at the injury site.

WHERE? Initially, we will recruit patients from U.K. Major Trauma Centres. Most assessments will be done in U.K. Spinal Injury Centres. Later on, we we also started recruiting from overseas.

HOW LONG? We aim to recruit 222 - 260 patients over 4 years. Patients will be followed up for a year.

WHAT DO WE ASSESS? Patients will be assessed (using questionnaires and by examination) how well they can use their hands, walk, control their bladder and bowel and their quality of life. Some of these assessments will be repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

WHAT IS THE OPTIONAL MECHANISTIC STUDY? DISCUS includes an optional study for at least 50 patients who will take part in the randomised controlled trial. The aim of the mechanistic study is to determine how duroplasty improves outcome, i.e. whether duroplasty reduces cord compression, improves blood flow to the injured cord perfusion, improves cord metabolism and reduces cord inflammation.

WHAT IS THE OPTIONAL INFORMATION STUDY? For the first two years, a study called QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) is designed to optimise patient recruitment and informed consent in the trauma setting.

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH QUESTION: After severe traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), does the addition of dural decompression to bony decompression (includes laminectomy) improve muscle strength in the limbs at 6 months, compared with bony decompression alone? BACKGROUND: TSCI is a devastating condition that affects about 1,000 people in the UK annually. Most remain disabled, tetraplegic or wheelchair bound and are dependent on carers with significant cost to patients, carers and the NHS. Surgery aims to reduce spinal deformity, stabilise the spine and achieve bony decompression of the cord. To date, no treatments have been shown to improve outcome.

AIMS / OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to determine if, in patients with acute, severe TSCI, the addition of dural decompression to bony decompression improves muscle strength. We hypothesise that, after TSCI, the cord swells and is compressed against the dura. Secondary objectives are to assess patient impact i.e. functional outcomes, health related quality of life (HRQoL), complication rates and mortality. Mechanistic sub-studies aim to determine if the addition of duroplasty improves cord perfusion, reduces cord ischaemia and cord inflammation.

METHODS: This is a prospective, phase III, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT). We aim to recruit 222 adults with acute, severe cervical TSCI (American spinal injuries association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B or C) who will be randomised 1:1 to undergo bony decompression alone versus bony decompression with duroplasty. Patients and assessors will be blinded to study arm. The primary outcome is change in AIS motor score (AMS) at 6 months compared with admission (Delta-AMS); secondary outcomes will assess function (grasp, walking, urinary + anal sphincters), HRQoL, complications, need for further surgery and mortality, assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months from randomisation. A subgroup of 50 patients (25 per arm) will also have observational monitoring from the injury site using a pressure probe (intraspinal pressure ISP, spinal cord perfusion pressure SCPP) and microdialysis (MD) catheter (cord metabolism: tissue glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate-to-pyruvate ratio (LPR), glutamate, glycerol); cord inflammation: tissue chemokines/cytokines. Initially, patients were only recruited from UK major trauma centres (MTCs). DISCUS is now also recruiting patients from International sites.

TIMELINES FOR DELIVERY: The initial study duration was 72 months and includes 6 months set-up, 48 months recruitment, 12 months to complete follow-up and 6 months for data analysis and final reporting of results. There will be a formal stop/go review at month 15 (after 9 months of recruitment) to ensure a minimum of 4 sites have been opened and 8 patients randomised. If these targets are met, the trial will recruit for a further 36 months. Data from the pilot will be included in the final analysis. Recruitment has been extended to end on 30 June 2027.

ANTICIPATED IMPACT AND DISSEMINATION: It is anticipated that the addition of duroplasty to standard of care will improve muscle strength in patients; this has obvious benefits for patients and their carers as well as substantial gains for the NHS and society including economic implications. If this RCT shows that the addition of duroplasty to standard treatment is beneficial, it is anticipated that duroplasty will become standard NHS care in all 26 UK MTCs, and internationally. Participants will be informed of study findings via the Surgical Intervention Trials Unit (SITU) website and the Spinal Injuries Association (SIA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

  • Decompression, surgical; Neurosurgery; Paralysis
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 222 is above the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

St George's, University of London is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥16 years
  2. Severe cervical (C2 - T1) traumatic spinal cord injury (AIS grade A-C)
  3. Deemed to require and be suitable for surgery that includes laminectomy by local surgeon
  4. Surgery within 72 hours of traumatic spinal cord injury
  5. Able to provide or consultee declaration or proxy consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Dural tear due to traumatic spinal cord injury
  2. Life-limiting or rehabilitation-restricting co-morbidities
  3. Thoracic or lumbar traumatic spinal cord injury
  4. Other central nervous system disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
222 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Duroplasty

    Duroplasty (includes Surgery with Laminectomy)

    Procedure: Duroplasty · Procedure: Spinal surgery

  • Active comparator
    No duroplasty

    No duroplasty (but includes surgery with Laminectomy)

    Procedure: Spinal surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureDuroplasty

    Expansion Duroplasty

  • ProcedureSpinal surgery

    Spinal surgery including laminectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in AIS motor score

    Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total limb motor score at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months versus baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in AIS light touch score

    Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total light touch sensory score

    Time frame: 6 months versus baseline

  2. Change in AIS pin prick score

    Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total pin prick sensory score

    Time frame: 6 months versus baseline

  3. Change in AIS grade

    Change in American Spinal Injury Association grade

    Time frame: 6 months versus baseline

  4. CUE-Q

    Capabilities of upper extremity-questionnaire (CUE-Q)

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Grip strength

    Hand grip strength assessed with dynamometer

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. WISCI II

    Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version ii

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. SCIM III

    Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. SF-36

    Short Form survey 36

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  9. Spinal re-operations

    Number of reoperations on spine

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Adverse events

    Procedure Specific complications and adverse events

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. MRI

    Magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spine

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 months

  14. Injury site physiology and metabolism (optional)

    Optional mechanistic study: Mean daily intraspinal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure, tissue glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, glutamate, cytokines measured from the injury site

    Time frame: Up to 5 days after surgery

07

Study locations

29 of 34 sites recruiting
  • Universität Klinik für Neurochirurgie
    Innsbruck, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Claudius Thome · Principal investigator
  • Kepler University Hospital
    Linz, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Wolfgang Senker · Principal investigator
  • University Hospital Salzburg
    Salzburg, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Lukas Grassner · Principal investigator
  • St Polten University Hospital
    Sankt Pölten, Austria
    Recruiting
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Bart Depreitere · Principal investigator
  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei, China
    Recruiting
  • Masaryk Hospital
    Ústí nad Labem, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen · Principal investigator
  • Kuopio University Hospital
    Kuopio, Finland
    Recruiting
  • BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Jonathan Neuhoff · Principal investigator
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, 60596 FRANKFURT AM MAIN
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Hadassah Medical Center
    Jerusalem, Israel
    Recruiting
    • Guy Rosenthal · Principal investigator
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Centre
    Jerusalem, Israel
    Recruiting
    • Cezar Mizrahi · Principal investigator
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Recruiting
    • Marko Jug · Principal investigator
  • 12 de Octubre University Hospital
    Madrid, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Igor Paredes · Principal investigator
  • Skåne University Hospital
    Lund, Sweden
    Recruiting
    • Niklas Marklund · Principal investigator
  • National Spinal Injuries Centre
    Aylesbury, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
    Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Vladimir Petrik · Principal investigator
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Ivan Timofeev · Principal investigator
  • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Andreas Demetriades · Principal investigator
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Likhith Alakandy · Principal investigator
  • Hull Royal Infirmary
    Hull, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Vasileios Arzoglou · Principal investigator
  • Leeds General Infirmary
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Christopher Derham · Principal investigator
  • The Walton Centre
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Martin Wilby · Principal investigator
  • St George's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Marios C Papadopoulos, MD · Contactmpapadop@sgul.ac.uk · 02087254179
    • Marios Papadopoulos · Principal investigator
  • St Mary's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Haider Kareem · Principal investigator
  • The London Spinal Cord Injury Centre
    London, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • The Royal London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Christopher Uff · Principal investigator
  • Queen's Medical Centre
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Daniel D'Aquino · Principal investigator
  • Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries,
    Oswestry, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Salford Royal
    Salford, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Shrijit Panikkar · Principal investigator
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Marcel Ivanov · Principal investigator
    • Rohit Bhide · Principal investigator
  • North West Regional Spinal Injuries Centre
    Southport, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Pinderfields Hospital
    Wakefield, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Saadoun S, Asif H, Papadopoulos MC. The concepts of Intra Spinal Pressure (ISP), Intra Thecal Pressure (ITP), and Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure (SCPP) in acute, severe traumatic spinal cord injury: Narrative review. Brain Spine. 2024 Oct 16;4:103919. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103919. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39654909 ↗
  • Saadoun S, Grassner L, Belci M, Cook J, Knight R, Davies L, Asif H, Visagan R, Gallagher MJ, Thome C, Hutchinson PJ, Zoumprouli A, Wade J, Farrar N, Papadopoulos MC. Duroplasty for injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling: protocol of the DISCUS randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 7;24(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07454-2. PubMed 37550727 ↗
  • Werndle MC, Saadoun S, Phang I, Czosnyka M, Varsos GV, Czosnyka ZH, Smielewski P, Jamous A, Bell BA, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC. Monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injury: initial findings of the injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):646-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000028. PubMed 24231762 ↗
  • Phang I, Werndle MC, Saadoun S, Varsos G, Czosnyka M, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC. Expansion duroplasty improves intraspinal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure, and vascular pressure reactivity index in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jun 15;32(12):865-74. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3668. Epub 2015 May 4. PubMed 25705999 ↗
  • Phang I, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC, Saadoun S. Microdialysis to Optimize Cord Perfusion and Drug Delivery in Spinal Cord Injury. Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):522-31. doi: 10.1002/ana.24750. Epub 2016 Aug 19. PubMed 27463064 ↗
  • Saadoun S, Papadopoulos MC. Acute, Severe Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Monitoring from the Injury Site and Expansion Duraplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021 Jul;32(3):365-376. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 May 7. PubMed 34053724 ↗
  • Asif H, Tsan SEH, Boseta E, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC, Saadoun S. Effect of Sevoflurane Concentration, Blood Pressure, Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension, Temperature, and Stimulation on Spinal Cord Blood Flow in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: An Exploratory Study. Anesthesiology. 2026 Apr 1;144(4):1012-1015. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005911. Epub 2026 Jan 30. No abstract available. PubMed 41619740 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Appropriately anonymised datasets from our sponsored research will be made available for further analysis wherever possible under our Research Data Management policy: https://www.sgul.ac.uk/about/governance/policies/research-data-management

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Publications on this study will be available form PubMed, Study website and other publicly accessible resources.

Access criteria: Specific requests for data sharing should be directed to sponsor St George's University London.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.sgul.ac.uk

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 80 months after the start.

Of 790 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 80 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 839 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 21, 2021
First posted
Jun 23, 2021
StartActual
Oct 8, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
Last update
Jul 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04936620
Collaborators
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, University of Bristol, Ohio State University, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Paracelsus Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 23, 2021
Start date
Oct 8, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Study contacts

Sophie Reynolds
Contact
discus@nds.ox.ac.uk
079 17100953
Ghazal Ebrat
Contact
gebrat@sgul.ac.uk
Marios C Papadopoulos
principal investigator · St George's, University of London, U.K.
Samira Saadoun
principal investigator · St George's, University of London, U.K.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion