ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07173764COMPARTSUpdated Sep 15, 2025

Congenital and Maternal Point of Care Rapid Testing for Syphilis Study, Uganda

An observational study in Syphilis and Syphilis, Congenital, sponsored by St George's, University of London. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.

Sponsored by St George's, University of London · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Syphilis is an infection which affects about 1 in 25 pregnant women in Uganda. If the infection is not diagnosed and treated this can be a risk to the mother and unborn baby's health. This study aims to see whether a new test for syphilis infection in mothers and babies which can give a result in 10 minutes is as good as the standard tests that are done in the laboratory and take hours or days to provide results.

Read the detailed description

Maternal syphilis is a major cause of poor birth outcomes including congenital syphilis (CS), which may cause miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects. In 2016, the global maternal syphilis prevalence was an estimated 0.69% resulting in a global CS rate of 473 per 100,000 live births and 661,000 total CS cases, including 355,000 adverse birth outcomes and 306,000 non-clinical CS cases (infants without clinical signs born to untreated mothers). The prevalence of syphilis and CS in Uganda is high. In a study of 570 antenatal women with HIV in Kampala, 5.1% had syphilis. Other Ugandan studies have demonstrated >3% prevalence of antenatal syphilis and CS prevalence of 3.8% among newborns.

Testing for syphilis in pregnancy accompanied by effective treatment with benzyl penicillin G (benzathine penicillin) can significantly reduce the risk of CS. This should ideally occur as early in pregnancy as possible, with each additional week of delay in diagnosis and treatment increasing the risk of CS. Syphilis testing in Uganda, as in many other low- and middle-income countries, primarily relies on rapid diagnostic tests that detect IgG antibodies against Treponema pallidum, the bacterium responsible for syphilis. These treponemal tests (TT) are highly sensitive and therefore valuable for initial diagnosis but cannot differentiate between untreated and previously treated syphilis due to their lifelong positive result.

To confirm infection, a lipoidal, non-treponemal test (NTT) like the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test is also required. NTTs are relatively inexpensive but require a reliable electricity supply, reagents, laboratory infrastructure and trained laboratory personnel. The performance of tests like the RPR may be suboptimal with wide inter-laboratory variation, especially in low-income settings with high humidity levels. This prevents diagnosis and treatment from occurring during the same antenatal visit, leading to treatment delays or treatment being missed entirely. Following treatment, NTT antibody titres are ideally followed up to 12 or 24 months (depending on syphilis stage and HIV status), which is also complicated by the above issues.

In babies born to mothers with syphilis, serological diagnosis of CS is made by demonstrating a ≥4- fold higher NTT titre in infant compared to maternal blood (e.g., maternal NTT titre 1:2, infant NTT titre 1:8). The higher titre in the infant suggests that NTT antibodies were being made in the fetus representing infant infection. TTs are not useful in the serological diagnosis of CS because they likely represent transplacental transfer of maternal treponemal IgG. The infrastructure required and delays to provision of results for traditional RPR testing creates similar challenges in diagnosing and treating infants born at risk of CS or with clinical features consistent with CS as it does in pregnant persons.

Lateral flow assays are simple, quick, and potentially low-cost tests that can be conducted at the point- of-care, enabling clinicians to make timely diagnoses and allowing testing and treatment to be provided during the same encounter. This has clear benefits for patients in reducing number of clinic visits required, and in the context of the Ugandan healthcare system where only 37% of women receive antenatal care in the first trimester and 68% have 4 or more antenatal visits, reducing any delays to treatment and risk of loss to follow up are essential.

The Chembio DPP Syphilis TnT (Chembio Diagnostics, Medford, NY, USA) is a point of care test (POCT) that gives both treponemal IgG and IgM and non-treponemal IgG and IgM results. It is the second generation of a device with improvements in sensitivity of non-treponemal tests compared to the first generation Syphilis Screen \& Confirm test. The results provided by the Chembio DPP TnT and the CS test (under development) could allow healthcare providers to accurately diagnose pregnant women and newborns with syphilis and commence treatment during the same clinical encounter, reducing delayed and missed treatment. It has the potential to allow for differentiation between current and past infection and is capable of quantification of treponemal and non-treponemal IgM and IgG (TnT test), and treponemal and non-treponemal IgA and IgM (CS test) which may allow improvements in the diagnosis of active infection and confirmation of treatment success.

This study will validate Chembio DPP TnT against conventional treponemal and non-treponemal testing pathways in a Ugandan population, using blood samples from pregnant women, umbilical cords, and newborns taken around the time of delivery. Validation of the Chembio DPP TnT could facilitate its implementation in streamlined diagnosis and treatment monitoring pathways that might reduce delays to treatment, improve treatment rates and confirmation of treatment success. This pilot study will demonstrate the feasibility of performing such validation in this setting and will therefore lay the groundwork for further larger studies to contribute further to this validation work.

02

Conditions studied

  • Syphilis
  • Syphilis, Congenital

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • syphilis
  • point of care test
03

In context

Syphilis

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Syphilis; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 400 across 39 observational studies indexed under Syphilis.

Browse Syphilis studies →

Lead sponsor

St George's, University of London is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Mothers delivering at Kawempe National Referral Hospital with a positive syphilis rapid diagnostic test during their current pregnancy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mothers delivering at Kawempe National Referral Hospital with a positive syphilis rapid diagnostic test during their current pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mothers who are unable to give written .
  • Mothers with evidence of neurological symptoms compatible with neurological syphilis.
  • Mothers who are aged less than 14 years. Emancipated and mature minors are allowed to consent for research per Ugandan law.11
  • Mothers, who in the view of the study team, are unable to adhere to required study procedures
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcomes

    Correlation of binary non-treponemal IgM and IgG results for the Chembio DPP Syphilis TnT with RPR positivity. Correlation of binary treponemal IgM and IgG results for the Chembio DPP Syphilis TnT with Treponemal Antibody (TPAB) positivity. Correlation of binary IgA and IgM results for the Chembio DPP Syphilis CS and Chembio DPP Syphilis TnT to the RPR results in mother and baby to confirm the diagnosis of congenital syphilis in the neonate.

    Time frame: At enrolment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07173764
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University, MU-JHU CARE
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion