ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07699679PHOTONUpdated Oct 7, 2026

Photobiomodulation in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With No-Touch vs Conventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting.

An interventional study of Photobiomodulation Therapy and Sham Laser irradiation in Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) and Surgical Wound Healing, sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 7, 2026Start date movedPrimary outcomes revised+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
292
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial aims to evaluate the impact of photobiomodulation therapy on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study will compare two techniques for saphenous vein graft harvesting: the conventional technique and the no-touch technique. Participants will be randomly allocated into four groups: conventional harvesting with sham laser, conventional harvesting with photobiomodulation, no-touch harvesting with sham laser, and no-touch harvesting with photobiomodulation. The primary objective is to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation on wound healing and postoperative complications related to the saphenous vein harvesting site. Secondary outcomes include clinical outcomes and functional capacity after surgery. The results may contribute to improving postoperative recovery and optimizing surgical strategies in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Read the detailed description

Cardiovascular diseases remain one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a widely performed surgical procedure for the treatment of advanced coronary artery disease. The saphenous vein is frequently used as a graft in CABG; however, complications related to vein harvesting, including wound infection, delayed healing, and postoperative pain, remain relevant clinical concerns.

The no-touch technique for saphenous vein harvesting has been proposed as a strategy to preserve the structural integrity of the vein and potentially improve graft patency and reduce local tissue trauma. In addition, photobiomodulation therapy (low-level laser therapy) has demonstrated beneficial effects on tissue repair, inflammation modulation, and wound healing.

This study, named PHOTON Study, is a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the effects of photobiomodulation therapy in patients undergoing CABG. Participants will be randomized into four groups according to the harvesting technique and the use of photobiomodulation therapy. This study protocol was developed in accordance with the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines.

Photobiomodulation will be applied using a cluster laser device (E-light, DMC Equipamentos Ltda., Brazil) with a wavelength of 660 nm and output power of 100 mW. The laser will be applied locally along the surgical incision of the saphenous vein harvesting site using a point technique with standardized spacing between application points. The intervention will be performed intraoperatively and during the early postoperative period.

The primary outcomes include wound healing and postoperative complications related to the saphenous vein harvesting site. Secondary outcomes include clinical outcomes and functional capacity following surgery.

This trial may contribute to improving postoperative care and recovery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
  • Surgical Wound Healing

Keywords

  • Photobiomodulation
  • Low-Level Laser Therapy
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
  • Saphenous Vein Harvesting
  • No-Touch Technique
  • Wound Healing
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 292 is above the median of 124 across 3,006 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 439 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • Use of the saphenous vein as a graft for myocardial revascularization
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery
  • Previous surgery in the lower limb that prevents saphenous vein harvesting
  • Active infection at the surgical site or lower limb
  • Severe peripheral arterial disease in the lower limbs
  • Hemodynamic instability preventing study protocol procedures
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with the outcomes of this study
  • Patients unable to perform postoperative functional capacity assessments
  • Individuals with highly pigmented skin or sensibility that may alter light absorption and penetration of the photobiomodulation therapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
292 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Conventional Harvesting + Sham laser

    Patients undergoing conventional saphenous vein harvesting with simulated laser application (sham).

    Device: Sham Laser irradiation · Procedure: Conventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting

  • Experimental
    Conventional Harvesting + Photobiomodulation

    Patients undergoing conventional saphenous vein harvesting with active photobiomodulation therapy applied to the surgical incision.

    Device: Photobiomodulation Therapy · Procedure: Conventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting

  • Sham comparator
    No-touch Harvesting + Sham laser

    Patients undergoing saphenous vein harvesting using the no-touch technique with simulated laser application.

    Device: Sham Laser irradiation · Procedure: No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting

  • Experimental
    No-touch Harvesting + Photobiomodulation

    Patients undergoing saphenous vein harvesting using the no-touch technique with active photobiomodulation therapy applied to the surgical incision.

    Device: Photobiomodulation Therapy · Procedure: No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting

Interventions

  • DevicePhotobiomodulation Therapy

    Photobiomodulation will be applied using a cluster laser device (E-light, DMC Equipamentos Ltda., Brazil) with wavelength of 660 nm and output power of 100 mW. The therapy will be applied along the surgical incision of the saphenous vein harvesting site using a point technique with standardized spacing between application points. The intervention will be performed intraoperatively and during the early postoperative period.

  • DeviceSham Laser irradiation

    Simulated photobiomodulation therapy applied using the same laser device without emission of therapeutic laser energy. This sham procedure is used to maintain blinding of participants and outcome assessors.

  • ProcedureConventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting

    Conventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting refers to the traditional open surgical technique used to obtain the great saphenous vein for grafting procedures, most commonly in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The procedure involves a continuous longitudinal incision along the course of the vein in the lower limb, allowing direct visualization and careful dissection of the vessel from surrounding tissues. Side branches are ligated or clipped, and the harvested vein is subsequently prepared for use as a vascular graft. The technique is performed under sterile surgical conditions by qualified surgeons.

  • ProcedureNo-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting

    No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting refers to a surgical technique for harvesting the great saphenous vein in which the vein is removed together with a pedicle of surrounding perivascular tissue, avoiding direct manual manipulation and excessive distension of the vessel. The procedure is performed through an open incision under sterile conditions, preserving the vein's adventitia, vasa vasorum, and surrounding connective tissue in order to minimize endothelial injury and maintain vascular integrity. Side branches are carefully ligated or clipped, and the harvested graft is prepared according to institutional surgical protocols for subsequent use in vascular or coronary artery bypass procedures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of surgical wound complications at the saphenous vein harvesting site

    Occurance of one or more surgical wound complications at the saphenous vein harvesting site, including wound infection, necrosis, wound dehiscence, wound drainage or fluid accumulation.

    Time frame: From postoperative hospitalization to 30 days and 3 months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency and severity of adverse responses to photobiomodulation therapy

    Assessment of the frequency and severity of adverse reactions associated with photobiomodulation therapy during the hospital stay.

    Time frame: From the first photobiomodulation therapy session until hospital discharge (Postoperative day 5 or earlier, if discharged).

  2. All-cause mortality

    Incidence of death from any cause following coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, 30 days after discharge and 3 months after discharge

  3. Hospital readmission

    Incidence of hospital readmission following coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Time frame: 30 days and 3 months after discharge

  4. Myocardial infarction

    Incidence of myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Time frame: Perioperative, 30 days after discharge and 3 months after discharge.

  5. Length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU)

    Duration of stay in the intensive care unit measured in days after surgery.

    Time frame: From date of surgery until ICU discharge (assessed up to 30 days).

  6. Length of hospital stay

    Total duration of hospital stay measured in days.

    Time frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge (assessed up to 60 days)

  7. Plasma interleukin-1 (IL-1) levels

    Assessment of plasma IL-1 concentrations measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  8. Plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels

    Assessment of plasma IL-6 concentrations measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  9. Plasma interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels

    Assessment of plasma IL-8 concentrations measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  10. Plasma interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels

    Assessment of plasma IL-10 concentrations measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  11. Plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels

    Assessment of plasma TNF-α concentrations measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  12. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels

    Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring TBARS levels in EDTA plasma samples.

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  13. Protein carbonylation (CPr) levels

    Assessment of oxidative stress through protein carbonylation analysis.

    Time frame: Preoperative period, immediately after surgery before photobiomodulation application, 20 minutes after ICU admission, and on postoperative days 2 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

  14. Functional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk Test

    Functional capacity will be evaluated using Six-Minute Walk Test to assess exercise tolerance and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Time frame: One day before surgery, five days after surgery, 30 days after hospital discharge and 3 months after discharge.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital São Paulo, Federal University of São Paulo
    São Paulo, São Paulo 04021001, Brazil
08

References and documents

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Jan 2027
Oct 7, 2026
Interventions
Added Device: Sham Laser irradiation; removed Device: Placebo Laser. Arm changed No-touch Harvesting + Placebo→No-touch Harvesting + Sham laser; Conventional Harvesting + Placebo→Conventional Harvesting + Sham laser
Oct 7, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 removed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • RemovedFunctional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk TestTime frame: From preoperatory assessment to postoperative day 5 or at hospital discharge, 30 days and 3 months follow-up.
  • DescriptionIncidence of surgical wound complications at the saphenous vein harvesting site: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 7, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedFunctional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk TestTime frame: One day before surgery, five days after surgery, 30 days after hospital discharge and 3 months after discharge.
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Start date Aug 2026→Jan 2027
    Primary outcomes 1 removed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • RemovedFunctional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk TestTime frame: From preoperatory assessment to postoperative day 5 or at hospital discharge, 30 days and 3 months follow-up.
    • DescriptionIncidence of surgical wound complications at the saphenous vein harvesting site: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedFunctional capacity assessed by the Six-Minute Walk TestTime frame: One day before surgery, five days after surgery, 30 days after hospital discharge and 3 months after discharge.
    Interventions Added Device: Sham Laser irradiation; removed Device: Placebo Laser. Arm changed No-touch Harvesting + Placebo→No-touch Harvesting + Sham laser; Conventional Harvesting + Placebo→Conventional Harvesting + Sham laser
    + 3 other changes: verification date, description and design details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07699679
Responsible party
Solange Guizilini (Principal Investigator, Federal University of São Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Solange Guizilini, PhD
Contact
sguizilini@unifesp.br
+55 11 982887753

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion