An interventional study of vacuum assistant closure and CONVENTIONAL DRESSING in Open Fracture of Tibia, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-21.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
53 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Open; 14 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Open.
Browse Fractures, Open studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Group A will be treated with vacuum assistant closure
Device: vacuum assistant closure
Group B will be treated with conventional dressing
Device: CONVENTIONAL DRESSING
Expose the open wound bed to negative pressure. This pressure removes edema or hemorrhage, mechanically pulls on the wound edges, decreases in wound surface area, improves circulation, and enhances proliferation of granulation tissue that filled the soft tissue defect.
CONVENTIONAL DRESSING for wound of open fracture of tibia grade III B
- Time for definitive soft tissue coverage
- Evaluate the role of VAC in decreasing the time needed for soft tissue coverage and definitive fixation in open IIIB tibial fractures
Time frame: baseline
- The type of soft tissue reconstruction
Time frame: baseline
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2019; primary completion for Oct 2021, 24 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.