A Phase 4 interventional study of Gentamicin and normal Saline in Fracture Open Tibia, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Recruiting at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.
Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention
Local application of antibiotics directly to the traumatic wound is a promising treatment for the prevention of infection after open tibia fractures, which are a significant source of disease burden globally, particularly in low-income countries. This study aims to measure the effect of locally applied gentamicin on risk of infection for open tibial fractures in Tanzania. If proven effective, local gentamicin would be a highly cost-effective strategy to reduce complications and disability from open tibial fractures that could impact care in both high- and low-income countries.
Tibial shaft (shinbone) fractures are the most common major fracture of the lower leg and are frequently associated with a break in the skin known as an open fracture. Because the bone is exposed by the open wound, open tibial fractures are often complicated by infection and failure of bone healing, which can lead to long-lasting disability and in some cases amputation. Intravenous antibiotics administered early after injury are a well-established measure to prevent fracture-related infection (FRI), but their effectiveness is limited by poor blood flow at the fracture site and inability to achieve high local concentrations with systemic administration. Gentamicin applied locally within the open fracture wound is a promising adjunctive measure to reduce the risk of FRI after these injuries, but there are no high-quality clinical trials evaluating its use.
This will be the first randomized trial evaluating locally administered gentamicin to reduce infection in a fracture population. If efficacious, local gentamicin is likely to be a highly cost-effective preventive strategy for FRI and may ultimately be cost saving. Although these findings will originate from a low-income country, results may be generalizable to populations in both high and low-income countries and could therefore significantly reduce the global burden of open fractures.
53 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Open; 14 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 890 is above the median of 90 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Open.
Browse Fractures, Open studies →University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.
Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Open tibial shaft fracture meeting the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The intervention consists of 80mg of liquid gentamicin diluted in 5 mL normal saline (16mg/mL). The solution is injected by inserting a 22-gauge needle down to bone through an anteromedial approach at the level of the fracture site such that the injected solution fills the wound cavity. A total of 5mL of study solution will be administered.
Drug: Gentamicin
The control consists of 5 mL normal saline injected immediately after wound closure at the open fracture site. The solution is injected by inserting a 22-gauge needle down to bone through an anteromedial approach at the level of the fracture site such that the injected solution fills the wound cavity. A total of 5mL of study solution will be administered.
Drug: normal Saline
Liquid gentamicin administered at the open fracture site
Normal saline administered at the open fracture site
Occurrence of fracture-related infection (FRI)
Fracture-related infection is a consensus definition of infection after fracture treatment. It is diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon based on any of the following four diagnostic criteria: (1) fistula, sinus or wound breakdown; (2) purulent drainage from the wound or presence of pus during surgery; (3) phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens; or (4) presence of microorganisms in deep tissue taken during an operative intervention, as seen on histopathological examination. FRI diagnosis is likely to peak between 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery and has a non-normal time-to-event distribution, with incident cases rarely presenting later than 12 months after surgery. All events will be confirmed by an independent adjudication committee comprised of three masked, non-treating orthopaedic trauma surgeons.
Time frame: 12 months
Occurrence of nonunion
Binary outcome based on the following criteria: 1. Any unplanned reoperation for promotion of bone healing; OR 2. Modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) ≤10 at 12 months follow-up AND either: Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score ≤11 at 12 month follow-up, OR recommendation by treating surgeon for nonunion repair surgery
Time frame: 12 months
Occurrence of unplanned fracture-related reoperation
Occurrence of unplanned fracture-related reoperation, a binary variable, for infection, wound healing, or fracture union, excluding removal of implants for prominence/irritation. This may include but is not limited to: 1. Irrigation and debridement of surgical incisions or open fracture wounds due to infections or wound healing problems; 2. Revision wound closure for dehiscence; 3. Soft tissue coverage procedure for infected or necrotic wound; 4. Fracture delayed union or nonunion surgery (such as bone grafting or implant exchange); 5. Reoperation for hardware or prosthesis failure due to infection or bone-healing problems; 6. Amputation for infection, wound or fracture healing problem.
Time frame: 12 months
Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) as measured by EQ-5D-3L (Swahili version)
The EQ-5D is a survey instrument that assesses multiple domains of quality-of-life, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time frame: 12 months
Fracture healing by modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (mRUST score)
The mRUST score is based on evaluation plain radiographs of the fracture site. Each cortex is scored from 1-4 based on the degree of healing and summed resulting in an ordinal scale ranging from 4 to 16, with higher score indicating greater fracture healing.
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical fracture healing by Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
The FIX-IT score is an ordinal scale from 0-12 that encompasses two domains: ability to weight-bear and pain at fracture site, each scored from 0-6. Higher score indicates more clinical healing.
Time frame: 12 months
Occurence of FRI Suggestive Criteria
Suggestive criteria are signs/symptoms of infection that do not meet criteria for definitive fracture-related infection (FRI). These include clinical signs (wound redness, fever) and radiographic signs (sequestrum), elevated serum inflammatory markers, and new onset or increased non-purulent wound drainage.
Time frame: 12 months
Adverse events
All serious and non-serious adverse events will be reported as counts for each treatment group
Time frame: 12 months
Fold-change in creatinine level
Creatinine is a laboratory value used to assess kidney function. Creatinine levels will be measured preoperatively and 2-days postoperatively for all study participants.
Time frame: 2 days
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Gentamicins
University of California, San Francisco →