ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03938870Updated Feb 13, 2024

CNS Tau Kinetics in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Disease

An observational study in Alzheimer's Disease, Brain Diseases and Central Nervous System Diseases, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-13.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and currently has no disease modifying treatments or simple accurate diagnostic tests. The goal of this project is to study how tau (a protein thought to cause AD) is made, transported and cleared in the human body. Better understanding of these processes may lead to improved understanding of AD, earlier diagnosis and a way to evaluate treatment.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to examine how tau works in the Human Central Nervous System (CNS)and to test the hypothesis, that tau is altered (i.e. increased production, decreased clearance, and increased collection rate) with age, and in diseases caused by the disruption of how tau usually works. We will first test this hypothesis in AD and then test and compare other tau diseases in future studies. We have recently developed a novel approach to measure tau in the human CNS. We propose to utilize this approach to address fundamental questions of human tau production and metabolism in Alzheimer's disease. Researchers have designed this study to determine how long tau stays in the body. It involves labeling or marking tau with a special type of an essential amino acid called leucine. Our bodies naturally get leucine from the foods that we eat.

In this study, the participant will either be given labeled leucine through intravenous infusion, or be given labeled leucine in a drink. The researchers think that it would be more convenient for the participant if the study was done giving the leucine by infusion but this method has not been tested with tau. The first part of the study is to test the infusion method and find the optimal infusion rate and length of time to hopefully see tau. If the method cannot be confirmed with the young normal control group the study will move on to using the oral method of labeling. This has been proven to work but it will be more burdensome for the participants. The leucine is a stable form of carbon found in nature and has no side effects but it will stick to certain proteins such as tau making the tau "visible" to researchers. Once labeled, the researchers will take samples of Cerebral Spinal Fluid (CSF) at different time points and determine how long the tau stays in the system. This amount of time is called the "half-life". Knowing the half-life of tau will help researchers to develop clinical trials that target tau and future therapeutic interventions for AD.

The first type of labeling is Intravenous Infusion of Leucine. After successful screening, the subject would come to the CARS at 07:00 AM, (fasting from 10:00 PM the night before), and have an intravenous catheter placed. The researchers do not know exactly how much Leucine it will take to successfully label Tau so that they can see it. The first studies will be with Young Normal controls ages 18 and older. The researcher will test the following amounts of leucine; Leucine infusion for 24 hours at a rate of 4 mg/kg/hour. The researchers will process the samples immediately. If tau is visible at this amount a second participant will receive a lesser infusion time, leucine infusion for 16 hours at a rate of 4mg/kg/hour. The researchers will process the samples immediately, if tau is visible at this amount a third participant will receive a lesser amount of leucine to label tau. Leucine infusion at a rate of 2/mg/kg/hour for 24 hours. The samples will be tested and if the tau is seen at this amount then a lesser amount of infusion time will be tried. The leucine infusion will be done at at rate of 2/mg/kg/hour for 16 hours. This would be the goal of the study to infuse the least amount of leucine for the least amount of time.

All meals are prepared by the Research Kitchen. When receiving leucine the participant has to have their meals controlled for the natural leucine found in our diets. The participant receives three meals and three snacks in the 24 hours and then a BJC cafeteria breakfast after their first lumbar puncture.

Once the amount and time of leucine infusion is optimal more Young Normal Controls will repeat the infusion study for confirmation. Each participant will complete a total of 5 Lumbar Punctures over time.

If the infusion method is not capable of showing adequate levels of tau the study will move on to the Oral method of labelling. Participants will come to the Research Kitchen on day one to pick up meals for two days, leucine for two days, as well as a diet diary. Participants will receive a great deal of explanation and support as this method is burdensome because of the visits, three days a week to pick up their food, as well as needing to mix, and drink leucine in Kool-Aid 3 times a day for 10 days, and keep a diet diary.

Once participants are labeled the Lumbar Punctures are performed. The Infusion and the Oral method each have a schedule of Lumbar Puncture days.

Fundamental questions of tau kinetics and processing have not been addressed in humans. There has been no reliable technique to measure in vivo tau metabolism. Questions such as 1)what is the half-life of tau in the human central nervous system (CNS), 2)is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau increased due to over-production or under-clearance, 3)are tau kinetics altered in Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and 4)how much should tau be modulated by drugs which target tau have not been addressed to date in humans. We propose to apply a recently developed tau stable isotope labeling kinetics (SILK) method to measure tau kinetics in AD patients and age-matched cognitively normal controls to determine physiological and pathophysiological changes in tau metabolism. We hypothesize that tau production will be increased in AD.

Aim 1: To measure physiological tau kinetics with the tau SILK method in the CNS of normal human participants and determine the effects of age. (a) We will quantify in vivo CNS tau SILK kinetics of 10 YNCs (Age 18-64) and determine the physiological kinetics of human tau. (b) We hypothesize that tau half-life and clearance are slowed with increasing age. Tau kinetics under normal physiological conditions will be compared across different age groups. The participants with normal CSF tau concentrations and normal tau PET imaging results from 10 age-matched controls (age 65 and greater) from Aim 2 will be included in the analyses.

Aim 2: To determine pathological changes in tau kinetics in AD dementia. We hypothesize that soluble tau production is increased in AD with subsequent increase in aggregation rates and irreversible loss of soluble tau. We will examine the kinetics of CNS tau in 10 participants with late-onset AD dementia and 10 cognitively normal age-matched controls (age 65 and greater).

Results from this tau SILK study will help elucidate the dynamic kinetics of human CNS tau in physiology and pathophysiology of tauopathies. The tau SILK method will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the efficacy of tau-targeted therapies and help effectively design future

Genetic and biochemical evidence suggest that amyloid beta and tau contribute to the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of Alzheimer's Disease(AD). Tau cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) levels correlate with cognitive decline in AD, but currently we have little knowledge of tau metabolism in humans as no prior method could test the hypothesis that kinetics of tau are altered in disease. We pioneered the Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetics (SILK) to determine Abeta; kinetics and demonstrated increased Abeta42 production in mutation carriers of early onset AD and decreased Abeta; clearance in sporadic AD. We now propose to use recently developed tau SILK method to determine the tau kinetics in human central nervous system (CNS). Previous studies using mouse models suggest that tau is a slow turnover protein with a half-life of approximately 2 weeks. It is also less abundant compared to Abeta; however, we have utilized sensitive mass spectrometry method to detect and measure labeled tau in human CSF.

Quantitation of the physiological and pathological kinetics of tau in this proposal will be crucial for understanding the pathogenesis of AD and other tauopathies. For example, questions such as 'why is tau increased in AD CSF - overproduction or impaired clearance?' need to be addressed to guide therapeutic targeting. By quantifying the changes in tau production and clearance, better estimates of target engagement can be made. The tau SILK method will be an invaluable tool in future studies to determine the pathophysiology of tau in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Corticobasal degeneration (CBD), Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and Frontotempral Dementia (FTD)) and to evaluate potential drug candidates and genetic manipulations which target Tau. A combination of the tau SILK protocol and a novel tau PET (T807) imaging allows us to examine in-depth the in vivo human soluble and aggregate tau dynamics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Brain Diseases
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, Cognitive Disorders
  • Dementia
  • Mental Disorders
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Tauopathies

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Alzheimer's
  • biomarker
  • dementia
  • Tau
  • Tau Kinetics
  • Tauopathies
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is below the median of 200 across 814 observational studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

We will recruit 100 participants (age 18+) 30 Young Normal Controls, 30 AD participants (age 65+) and 40 age-matched controls (age 65+) to participate in this study. Studies will be conducted at the Clinical Trials Research Unit at Washington University School of Medicine. Volunteers will be screened for any major medical abnormalities, bleeding risks, or any other reason they might not tolerate the procedure.

The participants will either be labeled by intravenous infusion method or oral method. They will have 5 lumbar punctures (LPs) and the amount of labeled tau in the CSF will be analyzed to obtain tau kinetics in human central nervous system (CNS).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females of any race aged 18 or older
  2. No evidence of a neurologic disorder or traumatic head injury by history or examination
  3. Able to take food and drink by mouth safely
  4. Participants must be able to provide
  5. Absence of exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Requires tube feeding for nutrition and/or hydration
  2. Already on a special diet (e.g. Gluten free)
  3. History of bleeding disorder
  4. Allergy to Lidocaine
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Any for lumbar puncture e.g. blood thinners
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Experimental: Group 1

    30 Young Normal Controls(YNC) ages 18 \& Older will enroll to evaluate leucine infusion methods of labeling, vs. the oral method. They will have 5 lumbar punctures (LPs) and the amount of labeled tau in the CSF will be analyzed to obtain tau kinetics in human central nervous system (CNS).

    Other: L-Leucine 13C6

  • Experimental: Group 2

    Group 30 CDR \> 0. There will be collection of CSF and blood. The participants will either be labeled by intravenous infusion method with leucine or oral method based off the results from the Young Normal Control Group. They will have 5 lumbar punctures (LPs) and the amount of labeled tau in the CSF will be analyzed to obtain tau kinetics in human central nervous system (CNS).

    Other: L-Leucine 13C6

  • Experimental: Group 3

    Group of 40 CDR = 0 Age Matched. There will be collection of CSF and blood. The participants will either be labeled by intravenous infusion method with leucine or oral method based off the results from the Young Normal Control Group. They will have 5 lumbar punctures (LPs) and the amount of labeled tau in the CSF will be analyzed to obtain tau kinetics in human central nervous system (CNS).

    Other: L-Leucine 13C6

Interventions

  • OtherL-Leucine 13C6
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tau kinetics in cerebrospinal fluid [half-life of tau], as assessed by tau stable isotope labeling kinetics (SILK) method

    To measure physiological tau kinetics with the tau SILK method in the CNS of human participants.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Age

    Physiological tau kinetics in CNS will be analyzed to determine the effects of age.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Tau aggregation measured by PET Imaging

    Correlation between tau kinetics (SILK) measures \[half-life of tau\] and Tau PET Imaging results will be assessed.

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Amyloid aggregation measured by PET Imaging

    Correlation between tau kinetics (SILK) measures \[half-life of tau\] and Amyloid PET Imaging results will be assessed.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University in Saint Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bateman RJ, Munsell LY, Morris JC, Swarm R, Yarasheski KE, Holtzman DM. Human amyloid-beta synthesis and clearance rates as measured in cerebrospinal fluid in vivo. Nat Med. 2006 Jul;12(7):856-61. doi: 10.1038/nm1438. Epub 2006 Jun 25. PubMed 16799555 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2015 to primary completion in Jul 2023, 94 months.

Of 364 non-industry observational studies under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 81 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 203. This study's 94 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 405 studies reached it within 67 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 171.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 22, 2015
First posted
May 6, 2019
StartActual
Aug 18, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jul 6, 2023
CompletionActual
Jul 6, 2023
Last update
Feb 13, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03938870
Collaborators
BrightFocus Foundation, National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2019
Start date
Aug 18, 2015
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2023
Completion
Jul 6, 2023
Last update
Feb 13, 2024

Study contacts

Randall Bateman, MD
principal investigator · Washington University in Saint Louis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion