ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03650452ELEKTRAUpdated Sep 14, 2026Results posted

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of TAK-935 (OV935) as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Participants With Developmental and/or Epileptic Encephalopathies

A Phase 2 interventional study of TAK-935 and Placebo in Epilepsy, Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 44 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Takeda · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
141
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect on the frequency of all seizures (convulsive and drop) in participants treated with TAK-935 compared to placebo.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called TAK-935 (OV935). This randomized, double-blind study will assess the effects of TAK-935 (OV935), compared to placebo, on efficacy, safety, and tolerability in pediatric participants with Dravet syndrome (DS) or Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS). This multi-center trial will be conducted worldwide and will enroll approximately 126 participants.

Participants will be randomized based on their diagnosis in 2 categories; DS or LGS. The study will consist of 2 periods: Screening Period and Treatment Period. The overall duration of Treatment Period is up to 20 weeks including 8-week Dose Optimization Period and 12-week Maintenance Period. The overall time to participants in this study is approximately 30 weeks.

Participants completing this study will have an option to enroll in the open-label extension study, under a separate protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy
  • Dravet Syndrome
  • Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
  • Brain Diseases
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Tuberous Sclerosis
  • CDKL5 deficiency disorder
  • Dup15Q syndrome
  • Anoxic brain injury
  • Infantile spams
  • West syndrome
  • Cortical dysplasia
  • SCN1A
  • OV-935
  • Cholesterol 24S-hydroxylase inhibitor
  • Seizure
  • Anti-epileptic drug
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Drop seizure
  • Atonic seizure
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 422 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 141 is above the median of 50 across 1,239 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,026 studies on the registry; 89 are open to participants now.

Of its 178 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 154 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female participants aged greater than or equal to (>=) 2 and less than or equal to (\<=) 17 years
  2. Clinical diagnosis of DS or LGS
  3. Weight of >=10 kilogram (kg) at the Screening visit
  4. Currently taking 1 to 4 anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) at a stable dose
  5. Failed to become and remain seizure free with trials of at least 2 AEDs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has been admitted to a medical facility and intubated for treatment of status epilepticus 2 or more times in the 3 months immediately prior to the screening visit
  2. Non-epileptic events that cannot be reliably distinguished from epileptic seizures
  3. Participation in a clinical study involving another study drug in the previous month
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
141 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    TAK-935 placebo-matching tablets, orally or via gastrostomy tube (G-tube)/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), twice a day (BID) up to Week 20.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    TAK-935

    TAK-935 tablets orally or via G-tube/PEG tube, BID. Participants weighing \<60 kg received total daily dose of study drug calculated based on body weight. Participants weighing ≥60 kg at Baseline, were administered with 200 mg/day followed by 400 mg/day, then 600 mg/day, up to Week 20.

    Drug: TAK-935

Interventions

  • TAK-935 tablets or mini-tablets.

  • DrugPlacebo

    TAK-935 placebo-matching tablets or mini-tablets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Maintenance Period

    Seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of seizures (convulsive seizures for DS, drop seizures for LGS) reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent change from Baseline is defined as (frequency of seizures per 28 days during maintenance period - frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline) divided by frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period

    Seizure Frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of Seizures reported (convulsive seizures for DS, drop seizures for LGS) during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline is defined as (frequency of seizures per 28 days during treatment period - frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline) divided by frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline; Treatment Period: Weeks 0 to 20

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Convulsive Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum During the Maintenance Period

    Convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of convulsive seizures reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Convulsive Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Drop Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Stratum During the Maintenance Period

    Drop seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of drop seizures reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Drop Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Drop Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Drop Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20

  4. Percentage of Participants With LGS Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period

    Responders are defined as having over 50% drop seizure reduction compared to Baseline. Percent Reduction from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Drop Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Drop Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Drop Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Data is reported as reduction of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more in drop seizures from Baseline.

    Time frame: Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20

  5. Percentage of Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period

    Responders are defined as having over 50% convulsive seizure reduction compared to Baseline. Percent Reduction from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Convulsive Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Data is reported as reduction of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more in drop seizures from Baseline.

    Time frame: Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20

  6. Change From Baseline in Clinician's Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Responses of Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of Study Drug

    The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) focuses on clinicians' observations of the participant's cognitive, functional, and behavioral performance since the beginning of the study. The CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill participants). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 20

  7. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responses as Per the Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability TAK-935

    CGI-Change (CGI-C) treatment response ratings should take account of both therapeutic efficacy and treatment-related AEs. Each component of the CGI is rated separately; the instrument does not yield a global score. The CGI-C is rated on a 7-point scale, where, 0 = Marked improvement and no side-effects, 1 = Marked improvement and minimal side-effects, 2 = No Change, 3 = Minimal improvement and marked side-effects and 4 = Unchanged or worse and side-effects outweigh the therapeutic effect. Lower scores indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Week 20

  8. Percentage of Participants With Caregiver Global Impression of Change (Care GI-C) Responses as Per the Parent/Family Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of TAK-935

    The Care GI-C is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale where, 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Slightly improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Slightly worse, 6 = Much worse and 7 = Very much worse. Lower scores indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Week 20

  9. Change From Baseline in Plasma 24S-Hydroxycholesterol (24HC) Levels in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy

    A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy

    Seizure frequency was based on convulsive seizures for the participants in the Dravet Syndrome Indication and Drop Seizures for the participants in the LGS Indication. Seizure frequency per 28 days = (total number of seizures reported during the period) / (number of days during the period seizures were assessed) \* 28. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 20

07

Results

Posted Feb 18, 2021

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at 45 investigative sites globally from 8 August 2018 to 20 July 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboTAK-935
Started7071
Completed6066
Not completed105
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian31
Withdrew: Adverse event34
Withdrew: Early withdrawal from study treatment30

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Maintenance Period

Seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of seizures (convulsive seizures for DS, drop seizures for LGS) reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent change from Baseline is defined as (frequency of seizures per 28 days during maintenance period - frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline) divided by frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Maintenance Period
percent changePlaceboTAK-935
Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Maintenance Period3.11 (-78.8 to 163.0)-27.76 (-100.0 to 160.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs TAK-935 · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.0007 (The p-value is 2-sided and it is for the difference of percent change from baseline between TAK-935 and Placebo were computed using Rank Transformed Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusting for baseline seizure frequency and indication.) · Hodges-lehmann estimation: -30.48 · 95% CI -46.99 to -13.19The location shift (TAK-935 - Placebo) and Asymptotic 95% confidence interval between TAK-935 and Placebo (TAK-935 - Placebo) were based on Hodges-Lehmann Estimation from un-adjusted rank statistics.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period

Seizure Frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of Seizures reported (convulsive seizures for DS, drop seizures for LGS) during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline is defined as (frequency of seizures per 28 days during treatment period - frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline) divided by frequency of seizures per 28 days at baseline multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline; Treatment Period: Weeks 0 to 20
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period
percent changePlaceboTAK-935
Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Period0.75 (-60.1 to 437.8)-30.05 (-100.0 to 347.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs TAK-935 · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.0024 (The p-value is 2-sided and it is for the difference of percent change from baseline between TAK-935 and Placebo were computed using Rank Transformed ANCOVA adjusting for baseline seizure frequency and indication.) · Hodges-lehmann estimate: -25.93 · 95% CI -43.96 to -10.69The location shift (TAK-935 - Placebo) and Asymptotic 95% confidence interval between TAK-935 and Placebo (TAK-935 - Placebo) were based on Hodges-Lehmann Estimation from un-adjusted rank statistics.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Convulsive Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum During the Maintenance Period

Convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of convulsive seizures reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Convulsive Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Convulsive Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum During the Maintenance Period
percent changePlaceboTAK-935
Percent Change From Baseline in Convulsive Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum During the Maintenance Period9.38 (-47.3 to 153.5)-36.50 (-100.0 to 84.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs TAK-935 · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.0001 (The p-value is 2-sided and it is for the difference of percent change from baseline between TAK-935 and Placebo were computed using Rank Transformed ANCOVA adjusting for baseline seizure frequency.) · Hodges-lehmann estimate: -50.00 · 95% CI -75.03 to -25.09The location shift (TAK-935 - Placebo) and Asymptotic 95% confidence interval between TAK-935 and Placebo (TAK-935 - Placebo) were based on Hodges-Lehmann Estimation from un-adjusted rank statistics.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Drop Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Stratum During the Maintenance Period

Drop seizure frequency per 28 days is defined as total number of drop seizures reported during the period divided by number of days during the period seizures were assessed multiplied by 28. Percent Change from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Drop Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Drop Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Drop Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Negative percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline; Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Drop Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Stratum During the Maintenance Period
percent changePlaceboTAK-935
Percent Change From Baseline in Drop Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days in Participants With the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) Stratum During the Maintenance Period-1.90 (-78.8 to 163.0)-18.46 (-100.0 to 160.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs TAK-935 · Ranked ANCOVA · p = 0.1470 (The p-value is 2-sided and it is for the difference of percent change from baseline between TAK-935 and Placebo were computed using Rank Transformed ANCOVA adjusting for baseline seizure frequency.) · Hodges-lehmann estimate: -16.22 · 95% CI -39.50 to 4.49The location shift (TAK-935 - Placebo) and Asymptotic 95% confidence interval between TAK-935 and Placebo (TAK-935 - Placebo) were based on Hodges-Lehmann Estimation from un-adjusted rank statistics.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With LGS Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period

Responders are defined as having over 50% drop seizure reduction compared to Baseline. Percent Reduction from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Drop Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Drop Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Drop Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Data is reported as reduction of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more in drop seizures from Baseline.

Time frame:
Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With LGS Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period
percentage of participantsPlaceboTAK-935
Reduction of 25% or More in Drop Seizures from Baseline29.7 (15.9 to 47.0)42.5 (27.0 to 59.1)
Reduction of 50% or More in Drop Seizures from Baseline16.2 (6.2 to 32.0)27.5 (14.6 to 43.9)
Reduction of 75% or More in Drop Seizures from Baseline2.7 (0.1 to 14.2)10.0 (2.8 to 23.7)
Reduction of 100% in Drop Seizures from Baseline0 (0.0 to 9.5)5.0 (0.6 to 16.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period

Responders are defined as having over 50% convulsive seizure reduction compared to Baseline. Percent Reduction from Baseline (%) is defined as \[(Maintenance Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency - Baseline Period Convulsive Seizure Frequency) divided by Baseline Convulsive Seizure Frequency\] multiplied by 100. Data is reported as reduction of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more in drop seizures from Baseline.

Time frame:
Maintenance Period: Weeks 9 to 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Dravet Syndrome Stratum Considered Treatment Responders Throughout the Maintenance Period
percentage of participantsPlaceboTAK-935
Reduction of 25% or More in Convulsive Seizures from Baseline13.6 (2.9 to 34.9)66.7 (44.7 to 84.4)
Reduction of 50% or More in Convulsive Seizures from Baseline0 (0.0 to 15.4)41.7 (22.1 to 63.4)
Reduction of 75% or More in Convulsive Seizures from Baseline0 (0.0 to 15.4)20.8 (7.1 to 42.2)
Reduction of 100% in Convulsive Seizures from Baseline0 (0.0 to 15.4)8.3 (1.0 to 27.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinician's Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Responses of Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of Study Drug

The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) focuses on clinicians' observations of the participant's cognitive, functional, and behavioral performance since the beginning of the study. The CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill participants). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 20
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on scale
Change From Baseline in Clinician's Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Responses of Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of Study Drug
score on scalePlaceboTAK-935
Change From Baseline in Clinician's Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Responses of Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of Study Drug-0.3 ± 0.15-0.2 ± 0.14
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs TAK-935 · Mixed-Model Repeated Measure (MMRM) · p = 0.6829 (The p-value is 2-sided and it is for the difference (TAK-935 - Placebo) of change from baseline between TAK-935 and Placebo was computed using MMRM.) · Least square (ls) mean: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.49The MMRM model included treatment and visit as factors along with treatment\*visit interaction and baseline score as a covariate; and visit as repeated measure.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responses as Per the Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability TAK-935

CGI-Change (CGI-C) treatment response ratings should take account of both therapeutic efficacy and treatment-related AEs. Each component of the CGI is rated separately; the instrument does not yield a global score. The CGI-C is rated on a 7-point scale, where, 0 = Marked improvement and no side-effects, 1 = Marked improvement and minimal side-effects, 2 = No Change, 3 = Minimal improvement and marked side-effects and 4 = Unchanged or worse and side-effects outweigh the therapeutic effect. Lower scores indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Responses as Per the Investigator Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability TAK-935
percentage of participantsPlaceboTAK-935
Week 20, Score 012.217.2
Week 20, Score 12.015.5
Week 20, Score 285.765.5
Week 20, Score 300
Week 20, Score 401.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Caregiver Global Impression of Change (Care GI-C) Responses as Per the Parent/Family Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of TAK-935

The Care GI-C is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale where, 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Slightly improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Slightly worse, 6 = Much worse and 7 = Very much worse. Lower scores indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Caregiver Global Impression of Change (Care GI-C) Responses as Per the Parent/Family Reported Impression of Efficacy and Tolerability of TAK-935
percentage of participantsPlaceboTAK-935
Week 20, Score 12.013.8
Week 20, Score 212.210.3
Week 20, Score 318.432.8
Week 20, Score 455.137.9
Week 20, Score 58.23.4
Week 20, Score 64.11.7
Week 20, Score 700
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma 24S-Hydroxycholesterol (24HC) Levels in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy

A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Plasma 24S-Hydroxycholesterol (24HC) Levels in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy
mg/dLPlaceboTAK-935
Baseline102.77 ± 50.385102.20 ± 62.332
Change from Baseline at Week 24—-0.10 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy

Seizure frequency was based on convulsive seizures for the participants in the Dravet Syndrome Indication and Drop Seizures for the participants in the LGS Indication. Seizure frequency per 28 days = (total number of seizures reported during the period) / (number of days during the period seizures were assessed) \* 28. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 20
Reported as:
Median · seizures per 28 days
Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Treated With TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy
seizures per 28 daysPlaceboTAK-935
Baseline31.00 (3.1 to 1040.1)32.12 (2.6 to 5187.7)
Change from Baseline at Week 200.30 (-84.9 to 520.4)-6.29 (-1024.3 to 77.7)

Adverse events

Collected over From the first dose to 30 days post-last dose of study treatment (Up to 24 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/70 (0%)13/70 (18.6%)52/70 (74.3%)
TAK-9350/71 (0%)11/71 (15.5%)55/71 (77.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboTAK-935
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations4/702/71
Generalised tonic-clonic seizureNervous system disorders2/700/71
SeizureNervous system disorders2/702/71
BronchiolitisInfections and infestations1/700/71
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/701/71
Ear infectionInfections and infestations1/700/71
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/701/71
Seizure clusterNervous system disorders1/700/71
Status epilepticusNervous system disorders1/701/71
Foreign body in gastrointestinal tractInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/700/71
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 171
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboTAK-935
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations10/7012/71
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/7011/71
SeizureNervous system disorders7/704/71
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/706/71
SomnolenceNervous system disorders3/706/71
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/706/71
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders5/706/71
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/705/71
LethargyNervous system disorders0/705/71
InfluenzaInfections and infestations4/702/71

Baseline characteristics

Randomized Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized into the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Mean9.5 ± 3.939.6 ± 4.149.5 ± 4.02
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Female282250
Male424991
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Hispanic or Latino101121
Not Hispanic or Latino6060120
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboTAK-935Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian222244
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White474996
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Australia224
Canada336
China202141
Spain11819
Israel549
Poland121729
Portugal235
United States151328
Height
Height(cm)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Mean132.4 ± 20.34134.7 ± 21.34133.6 ± 20.81
Weight
Weight(kg)PlaceboTAK-935Total
Mean32.8 ± 15.9833.3 ± 15.1133.0 ± 15.49
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)((kg/m^2))PlaceboTAK-935Total
Mean17.63 ± 4.37817.43 ± 4.04817.53 ± 4.198

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

44 sites
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Colorado Children's Hospital
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Nicklaus Children's Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Pediatric Neurology PA
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
  • Rare Disease Research, LLC
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Center for Rare Neurological Diseases
    Norcross, Georgia 30093, United States
  • Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Mayo Clinic - PPDS
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Children's Hospital at Saint Peter's University Hospital
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Cook Children's Medical Center
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Monash Children's Hospital
    Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Austin Hospital
    Heidelberg West, Victoria 3081, Australia
  • Hospital For Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Peking University First Hospital
    Beijing, 100034, China
  • Capital Medical University (CMU) - Beijing Children's Hospital
    Beijing, 100045, China
  • Beijing Children's Hospital,Capital Medical University
    Beijing, 100069, China
  • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
    Changsha, 410078, China
  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University
    Shanghai, 201102, China
  • Shenzhen Children's Hospital
    Shenzhen, 518026, China
  • Sheba Medical Center-PPDS
    Tel Litwinsky, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
  • Soroka University Medical Centre
    Bear Sheva, 84101, Israel
  • Bnai Zion Medical Center
    Haifa, 31048, Israel
  • Edith Wolfson Medical Center
    Holon, 58100, Israel
  • Hadassah Medical Center
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel
    Petah Tikva, 49202, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • Szpital Kliniczny im. H.Swiecickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship 60-355, Poland
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne - PPDS
    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship 80-211, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady
    Krakow, 30-363, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Dzieciecy Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie
    Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
  • Instytut Pomnik Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka
    Warsaw, 04-730, Poland
  • NZOZ Centrum Neurologii Dzieciecej i Leczenia Padaczki
    Kielce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship 25-316, Poland
  • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central- Hospital Dona Estefania
    Lisbon, 1169-045, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, E.P.E. Hospital de Santa Maria
    Lisbon, 1649-035, Portugal
  • Largo da Maternidade de Julio DinisCentro Materno Infantil do Norte
    Porto, 4050-651, Portugal
  • Clinica Universidad Navarra
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Vithas La Salud
    Granada, 18008, Spain
  • Hospital Ruber Internacional
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hahn CD, Jiang Y, Villanueva V, Zolnowska M, Arkilo D, Hsiao S, Asgharnejad M, Dlugos D. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (ELEKTRA). Epilepsia. 2022 Oct;63(10):2671-2683. doi: 10.1111/epi.17367. Epub 2022 Aug 4. PubMed 35841234 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Access criteria: IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03650452
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Collaborators
Healx AI
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 28, 2018
Start date
Aug 8, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 9, 2020
Completion
Jul 20, 2020
Results posted
Feb 18, 2021
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Director Clinical Science
study director · Takeda (Note: This product was divested to Mistrau Bio, Inc. in 2026)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Soticlestat

Start the discussion