ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03538587Updated Aug 1, 2023Results posted

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Mindfulness-based Intervention for Children and Young Adults With High Grade or High-Risk Cancer and Their Caregivers

An interventional study of Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention and Psychoeducation in Glioblastomas, Sarcoma and Astrocytoma, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-01.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

People cope with cancer in different ways. Mindfulness means focusing on the present moment with an open mind. Researchers want to see if this can help children and young adults with a high-grade high-risk cancer with poor prognosis.

Objective:

To learn if mindfulness is feasible and acceptable for children and young people with high-grade high-risk cancer with poor prognosis and their caregivers.

Eligibility:

Children ages 5-24 with a high-grade or high-risk cancer, with a caregiver who agrees to do the study

Must have internet access (participants may borrow an iPod for the study)

Must speak English

Design:

All participants will complete questionnaires. These will be about feelings, physical well-being, quality of life, and mindfulness.

Researchers will review children's medical records.

Participants will be randomly put in the mindfulness group or the standard care group.

Participants in the standard care group will:

Get general recommendations for coping with cancer

Have check-in sessions 1 and 3 weeks after starting. These will last about 10 minutes each.

After participants finish the standard care group, they may be able to enroll in the mindfulness group.

Participants in the mindfulness group will:

Attend an in-person mindfulness training session. The child participant will meet with one research team member for 90 minutes while the parent participant meets with another. Then they will come together for a half hour.

Practice mindfulness exercises at least 4 days a week for 8 weeks.

Be asked to respond to weekly emails or texts asking about their mindfulness practice

Get a mindfulness kit with things to help them do their mindfulness activities at home.

Have a 30-minute check-in with their coach 1 and 3 weeks after starting. This can be in person or by video chat.

All participants (from both groups) will be asked to answer follow-up questions about 8 and 16 weeks after starting the study. Participants will be paid $20 for each set of questionnaires they complete to thank them for their time.

...

Read the detailed description

Background

  • Children and young adults diagnosed with a high-grade or high-risk cancer (e.g., diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, glioblastoma multiforme, relapsed-refractory leukemia, refractory metastatic sarcomas) face a poor prognosis given limited curative options.
  • Recent research has indicated that this population of patients and their parents experience elevated stress and poorer health-related quality of life (HRQL) relative to normative samples.
  • Recently published psychosocial standards of care in pediatric oncology strongly recommend that children diagnosed with cancer and their caregivers receive early and continued assessment of their wellbeing and have access to interventions to optimize functioning and HRQL. In addition, there is increasing recognition of the importance of palliative interventions early in the disease trajectory.
  • Despite this recommendation, minimal research has examined supportive care interventions for this population early in the disease trajectory.
  • Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have empirical support for their feasibility and efficacy in alleviating emotional distress and physical symptoms in children and adults with chronic health conditions, including terminally-ill patients and their caregivers.

Objectives

-To assess the feasibility of an enhanced mindfulness intervention (EMI) in children and young adults (ages 5-24 years) with a high-grade or high-risk cancer with poor prognosis and one of their primary caregivers.

Eligibility

  • Children and young adults ages 5-24 years and a parent or adult primary caregiver
  • Diagnosis of a high-grade or high-risk cancer with poor prognosis
  • English speaking
  • Must have access to a mobile device or computer with internet.
  • Potential participants will be excluded if there is evidence of pre-morbid severe cognitive or psychiatric disability in parent or child that would impair their capacity for participation, or if there is evidence of clinical disease progression at the time of referral to this study, such that it would prevent the child from engaging in the intervention.

Design

  • This is a pilot randomized controlled trial that will compare feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an 8-week enhanced mindfulness intervention (EMI) group (n=10 dyads) compared to a psychoeducation control group (n=10 dyads).
  • All participants will complete measures of feasibility (primary outcome) and exploratory outcomes at baseline and following the 8-week intervention. Exploratory measures will include emotional (e.g., depression, anxiety) and physical (e.g., pain, fatigue) wellbeing, as well as baseline mindfulness/self-compassion.
  • The 8-week EMI will consist of one initial in-person session with the child and parent, a series of at-home assignments, and two booster sessions. The psychoeducation group will be given educational material about coping with cancer.
  • The psychoeducation group will be offered the opportunity to participate in the EMI 8 weeks post-baseline
02

Conditions studied

  • Glioblastomas
  • Sarcoma
  • Astrocytoma
  • Brain Cancer
  • Leukemia

Keywords

  • Refractory Metastatic Sarcoma
  • Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma DIPG
  • Relapsed-Refractory Leukemia
  • Meditation
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,951 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 457 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 36 across 1,645 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,554 studies on the registry; 334 are open to participants now.

Of its 407 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with a high-risk/high-grade cancer (e.g., high-grade brain tumors, relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, high-grade sarcoma) characterized by poor prognosis (e.g., estimated 5-year survival rate \<30% based on scientific consensus in the literature, where available, or by expert physician report), as confirmed by medical record review.
  • Patients with active disease
  • Age greater than or equal to 5 years and less than or equal to 24 years of age
  • Must be able to speak and understand English.
  • Must have a parent or adult primary caregiver willing to participate in the study.
  • Ability of subject or parent/guardian to understand and the willing to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Must have access to a computer/mobile device and the internet.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PATIENTS:

  • Patients will be excluded if there is evidence of pre-morbid severe cognitive or psychiatric disability that would impair their capacity for participation or completion of evaluations in the judgment of the investigators.
  • Evidence of disease progression at the time of referral to this study to the extent that it would impede participation or completion of evaluations as determined by the medical advisory investigator in conjunction with the study principal investigator (PI)/adjunct PI.
  • Patients with treatment-related sequelae so severe that they would be unable to complete the study-related evaluations or intervention (e.g., treatment toxicity) as determined by the medical advisory investigator in conjunction with the study PI/adjunct PI.

INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PARENT OR ADULT PRIMARY CAREGIVER:

  • Must be a parent or primary caregiver of a child (age 5 to 24 years of age) who has been diagnosed with a high-grade/high risk tumor that carries poor prognosis (as defined above); and must live in the same household as the patient for a majority of the time.
  • Must have a child willing to participate in the study
  • Must be able to speak and understand English.
  • Ability of subject to understand and the willing to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Must have access to a computer/mobile device and the internet.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate Group

    Participate in an in-person session followed by a series of at-home assignments, and two booster sessions.

    Behavioral: Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group

    Participants will briefly meet with a member of the research team who will assess parent and child coping, and provide the child- caregiver dyad educational material about coping with cancer

    Behavioral: Psychoeducation

Interventions

  • BehavioralEnhanced Mindfulness Intervention

    The 8-week EMI will consist of one initial in-person session with the participant and parent, a series of at home assignments, and two "booster" sessions. The psychoeducation group will be given educational material about coping with cancer.

  • BehavioralPsychoeducation

    The psychoeducation group will be offered the opportunity to participate in the EMI 8 weeks post-baseline.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eligible Dyads (Parent-child) Who Enroll During a Two-year Period

    Percentage of eligible dyads (1 parent, 1 child) who enroll during a two-year period (the number of dyads who enrolled divided by the number of dyads who were found eligible).

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Percent of Participants (Parent/Child) With Treatment Specific Retention Among All Randomized Participants, With a Target Retention Rate of 70% Over the 8 Week EMI/Control Period

    Percent of participants who completed the study among those who enrolled and were randomized, with a target retention rate of 70% over the 8 Week EMI/control period.

    Time frame: 8 weeks from study entry

  3. Percent of Participants Who Completed a Mean of 4 Days/Week At-home Practices or More

    Compliance with at-home practices (e.g., at home assignments), with a proposed target rate of at least 4 out of 7 days per week on average over the 8 weeks. This will be measured in phone interviews and recorded on a study form.

    Time frame: For 8 weeks from study entry

  4. Score on a Scale for Caregiver/Children Reports of Satisfaction on the Feasibility Questionnaire

    The Feasibility questionnaire is a 12-item measure created by the researchers to assess satisfaction with the study. The first 6 items are on 5-point Likert scales and ask how helpful various aspects of the intervention were. Satisfaction scores are the mean of items 1-6 for both the caregiver and child forms, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores represent more satisfaction. For youth ages 8+ and caregivers, average item scores of \>3.0 reflect adequate satisfaction.

    Time frame: 8 weeks from study entry

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

    Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

    Time frame: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 2-3 months.

07

Results

Posted Aug 1, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Started46
Child participants23
Parent participants23
Completed22
Not completed24

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Eligible Dyads (Parent-child) Who Enroll During a Two-year Period

Percentage of eligible dyads (1 parent, 1 child) who enroll during a two-year period (the number of dyads who enrolled divided by the number of dyads who were found eligible).

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of dyads
Percentage of Eligible Dyads (Parent-child) Who Enroll During a Two-year Period
percentage of dyadsArm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Percentage of Eligible Dyads (Parent-child) Who Enroll During a Two-year Period100100
PrimaryPercent of Participants (Parent/Child) With Treatment Specific Retention Among All Randomized Participants, With a Target Retention Rate of 70% Over the 8 Week EMI/Control Period

Percent of participants who completed the study among those who enrolled and were randomized, with a target retention rate of 70% over the 8 Week EMI/control period.

Time frame:
8 weeks from study entry
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants(parent/child)
Percent of Participants (Parent/Child) With Treatment Specific Retention Among All Randomized Participants, With a Target Retention Rate of 70% Over the 8 Week EMI/Control Period
percentage of participants(parent/child)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Percent of Participants (Parent/Child) With Treatment Specific Retention Among All Randomized Participants, With a Target Retention Rate of 70% Over the 8 Week EMI/Control Period5033
PrimaryPercent of Participants Who Completed a Mean of 4 Days/Week At-home Practices or More

Compliance with at-home practices (e.g., at home assignments), with a proposed target rate of at least 4 out of 7 days per week on average over the 8 weeks. This will be measured in phone interviews and recorded on a study form.

Time frame:
For 8 weeks from study entry
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Who Completed a Mean of 4 Days/Week At-home Practices or More
percentage of participantsArm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Percent of Participants Who Completed a Mean of 4 Days/Week At-home Practices or More250
PrimaryScore on a Scale for Caregiver/Children Reports of Satisfaction on the Feasibility Questionnaire

The Feasibility questionnaire is a 12-item measure created by the researchers to assess satisfaction with the study. The first 6 items are on 5-point Likert scales and ask how helpful various aspects of the intervention were. Satisfaction scores are the mean of items 1-6 for both the caregiver and child forms, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores represent more satisfaction. For youth ages 8+ and caregivers, average item scores of \>3.0 reflect adequate satisfaction.

Time frame:
8 weeks from study entry
Reported as:
Number · score on a scale
Score on a Scale for Caregiver/Children Reports of Satisfaction on the Feasibility Questionnaire
score on a scaleArm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Child Participants1.833.5
Parent Participants—3.67
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Time frame:
Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 2-3 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
ParticipantsArm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group
Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)00

Adverse events

Collected over Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 2-3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate Group0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Arm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation Group0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
<=18 years235
Between 18 and 65 years235
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
Child participants11.0 ± 2.8213.33 ± 4.7312.16 ± 3.77
Parent participants44.0 ± 5.6642.0 ± 6.5643.0 ± 6.11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
Female459
Male011
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino224
Not Hispanic or Latino145
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White459
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
United States4610
School Setting for Child Participants
School Setting for Child Participants(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
Public134
Home School101
Current School Grade Level for Child Participants
Current School Grade Level for Child Participants(Participants)Arm 1 Enhanced Mindfulness Intervention (EMI) - Immediate GroupArm 2 Control Group - Psychoeducation GroupTotal
Grade 12011
Grade 10011
Grade 7101
Grade 4101
Grade 3011

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 13, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Dec 13, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Dec 13, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Dec 13, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All individual participant data (IPD) recorded in the medical record will be shared with intramural investigators upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Clinical data available during the study and indefinitely.

Access criteria: Clinical data will be made available via subscription to Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS) and with the permission of the study principal investigator (PI).

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03538587
Responsible party
Staci Peron, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator, National Cancer Institute (NCI)) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 29, 2018
Start date
Jan 29, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2022
Completion
Sep 13, 2022
Results posted
Aug 1, 2023
Last update
Aug 1, 2023

Study contacts

Staci M Peron, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion