An observational study in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Distributive Shock and Hypotension and Shock, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-12.
Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Observational
Among 39 studies in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome with a site in United States — 4 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome · United States.
Among the 39 studies in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome with a site in United States, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 18 observational ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 18 observational ones, and was the 26th registered.
195 studies on the registry are indexed under Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; 24 are open to participants now.
Browse Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome studies →4 of the 39 studies in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Kingman Regional Medical Center · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Michigan State University · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Phoenix Children's Hospital · Sites in United States
Ages 1–18
Akron Children's Hospital · Sites in United States
Ages 1 days–5 yrs · Healthy volunteers
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 20 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome studies recruiting now, 13 (65%) set no upper age limit and 4 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
39 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 2 · Phase 2 8 · Phase 3 5 · Phase 4 1
First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2018.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 134 across 94 observational studies indexed under Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.
Median enrollment 100 across the 21 interventional studies, 165 across the 18 observational. Of the 28 that completed or were terminated, 9 (32%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
16 of 39 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 835 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.
Of its 126 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (73%) have results posted.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center has 1 study filed under Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
5 of the studies in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07425587Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.Multicenter Symphony™ IL-6 Monitoring Sepsis ED Pilot Study | 2026-12-30 |
| NCT06654895Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.Multicenter Symphony IL-6 Monitoring Sepsis ICU Validation Study | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT07221630Akron Children's HospitalConventional Ultrafiltration Versus Dilutional Ultrafiltration in Pediatric CPB Patients | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT02055105Phoenix Children's HospitalModulation of Molecular Fingerprinting in Pediatric Sepsis | 2027-06 |
| NCT05977153The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation | 2027-08-31 |
Add all 5 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 39 studies in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of fluid alternations, hemodynamic changes, mechanical ventilation, pharmacologic agents, positional changes, and comorbidities on the Peripheral Intravenous waveform Analysis (PIVA) signal.
Intravascular volume status determination remains elusive. Standard vital sign monitoring, including heart rate and blood pressure, fails to detect intravascular volume depletion and volume overload. Likewise, invasive monitoring is fraught with risk including vascular injury and central line associated infections. As such, a minimally-invasive mechanism to overcome the barriers of standard monitoring to detect volume status derangement, would be highly valuable. The goal of the study is to perform a series of observational feasibility studies in healthy and hospitalized subjects to determine effects of fluid alternations, hemodynamic changes, mechanical ventilation, pharmacologic agents, positional changes, and comorbidities on the PIVA signal
The study will enroll patients hospitalized at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Cardiac Catheterization
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Distributive Shock
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Vasoactive and Inotropic Agents
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Congestive Heart Failure
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Atrial Fibrillation (undergoing elective direct current cardio version)
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing Surgery
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective direct current cardioversion
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Patients undergoing surgery requiring positive pressure ventilation and arterial line placement
Procedure: Peripheral Intravenous Analysis (PIVA) · Procedure: Standard of care invasive vascular monitoring · Procedure: Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring
Non-invasive measurement of peripheral venous waveform analysis (PIVA) obtained by connecting a standard transducer (AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, Co) to a universal adaptor or stopcock on a peripheral IV
Standard of care invasive monitoring in the intensive care settings with central venous catheters, pulmonary artery catheters, or trans-esophageal echocardiography for determining volume status.
Standard noninvasive vascular monitoring of blood pressure, pulse rate, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate.
Correlation of PIVA score to standard hemodynamic monitors
Peripheral intravenous waveform analysis score is used to detect intravascular volume status. The scale ranges from 2-40 and is interpreted as a surrogate for pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The normal scale range is 6-12. A PIVA score of 2 indicates a low intravascular volume and 40 indicates a high intravascular volume.
Time frame: Baseline to end of monitoring (Approximately 180 minutes)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 34 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome →
Vanderbilt University Medical Center →